• Treffer 15 von 160
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Confessional divides, cross-confessional connections, and Jewish responses

  • Studies in the Jewish reception of Christian theological discussions beyond the proper field of polemics are rare and only in their beginnings. Until now, scholars have often argued that Portuguese Jews discussed Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will because they were either struggling with their own Christian past or sought to help their 'New Jewish' coreligionists to turn into reliable members of the Amsterdam Sephardic community. This article uses the example of the Catholic Controversia de auxiliis, and the Protestant fight over Predestination before and after the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619) to argue that Portuguese Jews such as Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios recognised the cross-confessional dimension of the Christian debates on divine grace; they used their Iberian background and knowledge to order and explain what they observed; and they displayed their position as outsiders to deconstruct religious boundaries, imagine alternative religious landscapes, and finally re-insert themselvesStudies in the Jewish reception of Christian theological discussions beyond the proper field of polemics are rare and only in their beginnings. Until now, scholars have often argued that Portuguese Jews discussed Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will because they were either struggling with their own Christian past or sought to help their 'New Jewish' coreligionists to turn into reliable members of the Amsterdam Sephardic community. This article uses the example of the Catholic Controversia de auxiliis, and the Protestant fight over Predestination before and after the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619) to argue that Portuguese Jews such as Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios recognised the cross-confessional dimension of the Christian debates on divine grace; they used their Iberian background and knowledge to order and explain what they observed; and they displayed their position as outsiders to deconstruct religious boundaries, imagine alternative religious landscapes, and finally re-insert themselves into their newly created religious maps and orders. The argument is based on a close reading of one chapter of the last volume of Menasseh ben Israel's Conciliador (1651) as well as Daniel Levi de Barrios's poem Libre Alvedrio y Harmonia del Cuerpo, por disposicion del alma (1680).zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Sina RauschenbachORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5117/SR2021.1.001.RAUS
ISSN:1783-1792
ISSN:1781-7838
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Studia Rosenthaliana : journal of the history, culture and heritage of the jews in the Netherlands
Untertitel (Englisch):Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios on De auxiliis and Dordt
Verlag:Peeters
Verlagsort:Leuven
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2021
Erscheinungsjahr:2021
Datum der Freischaltung:16.01.2023
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Arminians; Arminius; Conciliador; Controversia de auxiliis; Counter-Remonstrants; Daniel Levi de Barrios; Early Modern Amsterdam; Libre Albedrio; Libre Alvedrio; Menasseh ben Israel; Molina; Molinists; New Jews; Portuguese Jews; Remonstrants; Synod of Dordt; auxilium; connections; cross-confessional; free will; grace; predestination; religious landscapes; scientia media
Band:47
Ausgabe:1
Seitenanzahl:26
Erste Seite:1
Letzte Seite:26
Organisationseinheiten:Philosophische Fakultät / Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft
DDC-Klassifikation:2 Religion / 29 Andere Religionen / 290 Andere Religionen
Peer Review:Referiert
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.