Trade-offs between geographic scale, cost, and infrastructure requirements for fully renewable electricity in Europe
- The European potential for renewable electricity is sufficient to enable fully renewable supply on different scales, from self-sufficient, subnational regions to an interconnected continent. We not only show that a continental-scale system is the cheapest, but also that systems on the national scale and below are possible at cost penalties of 20% or less. Transmission is key to low cost, but it is not necessary to vastly expand the transmission system. When electricity is transmitted only to balance fluctuations, the transmission grid size is comparable to today's, albeit with expanded cross-border capacities. The largest differences across scales concern land use and thus social acceptance: in the continental system, generation capacity is concentrated on the European periphery, where the best resources are. Regional systems, in contrast, have more dispersed generation. The key trade-off is therefore not between geographic scale and cost, but between scale and the spatial distribution of required generation and transmissionThe European potential for renewable electricity is sufficient to enable fully renewable supply on different scales, from self-sufficient, subnational regions to an interconnected continent. We not only show that a continental-scale system is the cheapest, but also that systems on the national scale and below are possible at cost penalties of 20% or less. Transmission is key to low cost, but it is not necessary to vastly expand the transmission system. When electricity is transmitted only to balance fluctuations, the transmission grid size is comparable to today's, albeit with expanded cross-border capacities. The largest differences across scales concern land use and thus social acceptance: in the continental system, generation capacity is concentrated on the European periphery, where the best resources are. Regional systems, in contrast, have more dispersed generation. The key trade-off is therefore not between geographic scale and cost, but between scale and the spatial distribution of required generation and transmission infrastructure.…
Verfasserangaben: | Tim TröndleORCiDGND, Johan LilliestamORCiD, Stefano MarelliORCiDGND, Stefan PfenningerORCiDGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-539611 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-53961 |
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Deutsch): | Postprints der Universität Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe |
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer): | Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe (146) |
Publikationstyp: | Postprint |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung: | 01.03.2022 |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2020 |
Veröffentlichende Institution: | Universität Potsdam |
Datum der Freischaltung: | 01.03.2022 |
Freies Schlagwort / Tag: | decarbonization; deployment; energy-system; integration; levelized cost; power-system; reanalysis; storage; transmission; wind |
Ausgabe: | 9 |
Seitenanzahl: | 21 |
Erste Seite: | 1929 |
Letzte Seite: | 1948 |
Quelle: | Joule 4 (2020) 9, 1929–1948 DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.018 |
Fördernde Institution: | European Research Council grant (TRIPOD) [715132]; Swiss Competence; Center for Energy Research-Supply of Electricity (SCCER SoE); [1155002546] |
Organisationseinheiten: | Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Sozialwissenschaften |
5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 53 Physik / 530 Physik | |
Peer Review: | Referiert |
Publikationsweg: | Open Access / Green Open-Access |
Lizenz (Deutsch): | CC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Externe Anmerkung: | Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle |