• search hit 13 of 1243
Back to Result List

Impact of applying a diabetes risk score in primary care on change in physical activity

  • Aim There is little evidence of the impact of diabetes risk scores on individual diabetes risk factors, motivation for behaviour changes and mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of applying a noninvasive diabetes risk score in primary care as component of routine health checks on physical activity and secondary outcomes. Methods Cluster randomised trial, in which primary care physicians (PCPs), randomised (1:1) by minimisation, enrolled participants with statutory health insurance without known diabetes, >= 35 years of age with a body mass index >= 27.0 kg/m(2). The German Diabetes Risk Score was applied as add-on to the standard routine health check, conducted in the controls. Primary outcome was the difference in participants' physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included body mass index, perceived health, anxiety, depression, and motivation for lifestyle change. Analysis was by intention-to-treat principle using mixed models.Aim There is little evidence of the impact of diabetes risk scores on individual diabetes risk factors, motivation for behaviour changes and mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of applying a noninvasive diabetes risk score in primary care as component of routine health checks on physical activity and secondary outcomes. Methods Cluster randomised trial, in which primary care physicians (PCPs), randomised (1:1) by minimisation, enrolled participants with statutory health insurance without known diabetes, >= 35 years of age with a body mass index >= 27.0 kg/m(2). The German Diabetes Risk Score was applied as add-on to the standard routine health check, conducted in the controls. Primary outcome was the difference in participants' physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included body mass index, perceived health, anxiety, depression, and motivation for lifestyle change. Analysis was by intention-to-treat principle using mixed models. Results 36 PCPs were randomised; remaining 30 PCPs (intervention: n = 16; control: n = 14) recruited 315 participants (intervention: n = 153; controls: n = 162). A slight increase in physical activity was observed in the intervention group with an adjusted mean change of 388 (95% confidence interval: - 235; 1011) metabolic equivalents minutes per week. There were no relevant changes in secondary outcomes. Conclusions The application of a noninvasive diabetes risk score alone is not effective in promoting physical activity in primary care. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03234322, registration date: July 31, 2017).show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Esther Seidel-JacobsORCiD, Fiona Kohl, Miguel Tamayo, Joachim Rosenbauer, Matthias Bernd SchulzeORCiDGND, Oliver Kuss, Wolfgang RathmannORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-022-01895-y
ISSN:0940-5429
ISSN:1432-5233
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35551495
Title of parent work (English):Acta diabetologica
Subtitle (German):a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
Publisher:Springer
Place of publishing:Mailand
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2022/05/13
Publication year:2022
Release date:2024/05/24
Tag:Physical activity; Prevention; Primary care; Risk prediction model; Risk score; Type 2 diabetes
Volume:59
Issue:8
Number of pages:10
First page:1031
Last Page:1040
Funding institution:Projekt DEAL; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF);; German Federal Ministry of Health; Ministry of Innovation, Science and; Research of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft
DDC classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Hybrid Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.