The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 164 of 20578
Back to Result List

Do dependency lengths explain constraints on crossing dependencies?

  • In syntactic dependency trees, when arcs are drawn from syntactic heads to dependents, they rarely cross. Constraints on these crossing dependencies are critical for determining the syntactic properties of human language, because they define the position of natural language in formal language hierarchies. We study whether the apparent constraints on crossing syntactic dependencies in natural language might be explained by constraints on dependency lengths (the linear distance between heads and dependents). We compare real dependency trees from treebanks of 52 languages against baselines of random trees which are matched with the real trees in terms of their dependency lengths. We find that these baseline trees have many more crossing dependencies than real trees, indicating that a constraint on dependency lengths alone cannot explain the empirical rarity of crossing dependencies. However, we find evidence that a combined constraint on dependency length and the rate of crossing dependencies might be able to explain two of theIn syntactic dependency trees, when arcs are drawn from syntactic heads to dependents, they rarely cross. Constraints on these crossing dependencies are critical for determining the syntactic properties of human language, because they define the position of natural language in formal language hierarchies. We study whether the apparent constraints on crossing syntactic dependencies in natural language might be explained by constraints on dependency lengths (the linear distance between heads and dependents). We compare real dependency trees from treebanks of 52 languages against baselines of random trees which are matched with the real trees in terms of their dependency lengths. We find that these baseline trees have many more crossing dependencies than real trees, indicating that a constraint on dependency lengths alone cannot explain the empirical rarity of crossing dependencies. However, we find evidence that a combined constraint on dependency length and the rate of crossing dependencies might be able to explain two of the most-studied formal restrictions on dependency trees: gap degree and well-nestedness.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Himanshu YadavORCiDGND, Samar HusainORCiD, Richard Futrell
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0070
ISSN:2199-174X
Title of parent work (English):Linguistics vanguard : multimodal online journal
Publisher:De Gruyter Mouton
Place of publishing:Berlin ; New York, NY
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2021/04/21
Publication year:2021
Release date:2024/03/01
Tag:crossing dependencies; dependency length; dependency treebanks; efficiency; language processing; syntax
Volume:7
Article number:20190070
Number of pages:15
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC classification:4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
Peer review:Referiert
License (German):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.