• search hit 1 of 17
Back to Result List

Semantic richness and density effects on language production

  • Language production ultimately aims to convey meaning. Yet words differ widely in the richness and density of their semantic representations, and these differences impact conceptual and lexical processes during speech planning. Here, we replicated the recent finding that semantic richness, measured as the number of associated semantic features according to semantic feature production norms, facilitates object naming. In contrast, intercorrelational semantic feature density, measured as the degree of intercorrelation of a concept's features, presumably resulting in the coactivation of closely related concepts, has an inhibitory influence. We replicated the behavioral effects and investigated their relative time course and electrophysiological correlates. Both the facilitatory effect of high semantic richness and the inhibitory influence of high feature density were reflected in an increased posterior positivity starting at about 250 ms, in line with previous reports of posterior positivities in paradigms employing contextualLanguage production ultimately aims to convey meaning. Yet words differ widely in the richness and density of their semantic representations, and these differences impact conceptual and lexical processes during speech planning. Here, we replicated the recent finding that semantic richness, measured as the number of associated semantic features according to semantic feature production norms, facilitates object naming. In contrast, intercorrelational semantic feature density, measured as the degree of intercorrelation of a concept's features, presumably resulting in the coactivation of closely related concepts, has an inhibitory influence. We replicated the behavioral effects and investigated their relative time course and electrophysiological correlates. Both the facilitatory effect of high semantic richness and the inhibitory influence of high feature density were reflected in an increased posterior positivity starting at about 250 ms, in line with previous reports of posterior positivities in paradigms employing contextual manipulations to induce semantic interference during language production. Furthermore, amplitudes at the same posterior electrode sites were positively correlated with object naming times between about 230 and 380 ms. The observed effects follow naturally from the assumption of conceptual facilitation and simultaneous lexical competition and are difficult to explain by language production theories dismissing lexical competition.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Milena RabovskyORCiDGND, Daniel SchadORCiDGND, Rasha Abdel RahmanORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000940
ISSN:0278-7393
ISSN:1939-1285
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33090840
Title of parent work (English):Journal of experimental psychology : Learning, memory, and cognition
Subtitle (English):Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence
Publisher:American Psychological Association
Place of publishing:Washington
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2021/01/01
Publication year:2021
Release date:2024/01/18
Tag:ERPs; competition; lexical; picture naming; semantic features; semantic richness
Volume:47
Issue:3
Number of pages:10
First page:508
Last Page:517
Funding institution:German Research Council (DFG)German Research Foundation (DFG) [AB 277/4-2, RA 2715/2-1]
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Psychologie
DDC classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.