• Treffer 3 von 3
Zurück zur Trefferliste

How to Redistribute the Revenues from Climate Policy?

  • In light of climate change mitigation efforts, revenues from climate policies are growing, with no consensus yet on how they should be used. Potential efficiency gains from reducing distortionary taxes and the distributional implications of different revenue recycling schemes are currently debated. To account for households heterogeneity and dynamic trade-offs, we study the macroeconomic and welfare performance of different revenue recycling schemes using an Environmental Two-Agent New-Keynesian model, calibrated on the German economy. We find that, in the long run, welfare gains are higher when revenues are used to reduce distortionary taxes on capital, but this comes at the cost of higher inequality: while all households prefer labor income tax reductions to lump-sum transfers, only financially unconstrained households are better off when reducing taxes on capital income. Interestingly, we find that over the transition period relevant to meet short-medium run climate targets, labor income tax cuts are the most efficient andIn light of climate change mitigation efforts, revenues from climate policies are growing, with no consensus yet on how they should be used. Potential efficiency gains from reducing distortionary taxes and the distributional implications of different revenue recycling schemes are currently debated. To account for households heterogeneity and dynamic trade-offs, we study the macroeconomic and welfare performance of different revenue recycling schemes using an Environmental Two-Agent New-Keynesian model, calibrated on the German economy. We find that, in the long run, welfare gains are higher when revenues are used to reduce distortionary taxes on capital, but this comes at the cost of higher inequality: while all households prefer labor income tax reductions to lump-sum transfers, only financially unconstrained households are better off when reducing taxes on capital income. Interestingly, we find that over the transition period relevant to meet short-medium run climate targets, labor income tax cuts are the most efficient and equitable instrument.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • cepa45.pdfeng
    (445KB)

    SHA-512:bcf61545a7797be9c4826f27bc5e9419026e57b8a334cb554578e94973ecc0e9142b3c9a6d2ccc5bd0cd87705f0d2871c77b7148cb374b9cb77158d8f66fda42

Metadaten exportieren

Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Ulrich EydamORCiDGND, Francesca DiluisoORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-548960
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-54896
ISSN:2628-653X
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):CEPA Discussion Papers
Untertitel (Englisch):A Dynamic Perspective with Financially Constrained Households
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):CEPA Discussion Papers (45)
Publikationstyp:Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:04.05.2022
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:04.05.2022
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:E-DSGE; double dividend; environmental tax reform; non-Ricardian households; revenue recycling
Ausgabe:45
Seitenanzahl:32
EU-Projektnummer / Contract (GA) number:03SFK5P0
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:AR 28100, AR 28600, MG 15915, QT 200
Fördernde Institution:European Commission
Organisationseinheiten:Extern / Extern
Zentrale und wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen / Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA)
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
JEL-Klassifikation:E Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics / E6 Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook / E62 Fiscal Policy
H Public Economics / H2 Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue / H23 Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
H Public Economics / H3 Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents / H31 Household
Q Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics / Q5 Environmental Economics / Q58 Government Policy
OpenAIRE:OpenAIRE
Peer Review:Nicht referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Bronze Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.