Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (22)
Document Type
- Article (14)
- Postprint (7)
- Part of a Book (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (22)
Keywords
- bibliometric analysis (6)
- entrepreneurship (5)
- Delphi study (3)
- research framework (3)
- 3D printing (2)
- Barriers (2)
- ESG ratings (2)
- Health insurance (2)
- Internet of Things (2)
- Wearable electronic device (2)
- Wearable technology (2)
- additive manufacturing (2)
- business incubators (2)
- co-citation analysis (2)
- decision processes (2)
- dentistry (2)
- entrepreneurial failure (2)
- entrepreneurship education (2)
- failure outcomes (2)
- firm performance (2)
- food industry (2)
- nascent entrepreneurs (2)
- performance analysis (2)
- prosthodontics (2)
- ranking type Delphi study (2)
- real options (2)
- start-ups (2)
- systematic review (2)
- (fsQCA) (1)
- Bibliometric analysis (1)
- Business model changes (1)
- Business model innovation (1)
- Convergence vs (1)
- FinTech (1)
- Financial technology (1)
- Fuzzy -set qualitative comparative (1)
- Investment advice (1)
- Lernaufgaben (1)
- R&D (1)
- Robo advisor (1)
- Strategic alliances (1)
- Umweltökonomie (1)
- Verhaltensökonomie (1)
- alliances (1)
- analysis (1)
- behavioral economics (1)
- classroom experiments (1)
- coercive power (1)
- cognitive activation (1)
- contracts (1)
- divergence (1)
- economic education (1)
- education (1)
- education; (1)
- environmental economics (1)
- innovation (1)
- knowledge graph (1)
- kognitive Aktivierung (1)
- literature review (1)
- pioneering strategy (1)
- reactions to organizational change (1)
- research issues (1)
- scenari (1)
- supply chain (1)
- systematic literature review (1)
- tasks (1)
- Ökonomische Bildung (1)
- ökonomische Experimente (1)
Entrepreneurship education (EE) has attracted much scholarly attention, showing exponential growth in publication and citation numbers. The research field has become broad, complex, and fragmented, making it increasingly difficult to oversee. Our research goal is to organise and integrate the previous literature. To this end, we use bibliometric analyses, differing from prior analyses, which are outdated or have a different focus. Our results show an immense growth in publications and citations over the last decade and an almost equal involvement of business and educational research. We identify the most productive and influential journals and authors. Our co-citation analysis reveals two research clusters, one focusing on psychological constructs relating to EE, and the other on entrepreneurial behaviour and new venture creation. Based on a review of the 25 most-cited articles on an annual basis, we identify and quantify the most relevant research themes and integrate them into a research framework that we propose for future research. A major finding is that extant research centres around the outcomes of entrepreneurship education, whereas its pedagogy is still mainly a black box.
In diesem Beitrag möchten wir einen Gedanken des amerikanischen Mathematikers Paul Halmos aufgreifen und konkretisieren. Wir möchten verdeutlichen, dass ökonomisches Denken nicht abstrakt gelehrt, sondern „erfahren“ werden muss, wenn es nachhaltig und in seiner ganzen Breite gefördert werden soll. Dazu dienen kognitiv aktivierende Aufgaben. Was man darunter versteht und welche Funktionen und Qualitätsmerkmale Aufgaben in der ökonomischen Bildung besitzen, verdeutlichen wir in den Abschnitten 1 und 2. Im Praxisteil (Abschnitte 3 bis 8) werden konkrete, unterrichtlich erprobte Beispielaufgaben vorgestellt, mit denen ökonomisches Denken erfolgreich gefördert werden kann. Unser Beitrag schließt mit einer kurzen Skizze wirtschaftsdidaktischer Implikationen (Abschnitt 9).