Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering an der Universität Potsdam
ISSN (print) 1613-5652
ISSN (online) 2191-1665
URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-series-822
Herausgegeben von den
Professoren des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering an der Universität Potsdam
Titel der Reihe bis Nummer 119: Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Softwaresystemtechnik an der Universität Potsdam
Die Schriftenreihe Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering (HPI) informieren über laufende Forschungsarbeiten und Projekte der Fachgebiete auf Deutsch und Englisch.
ISSN (online) 2191-1665
URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-series-822
Herausgegeben von den
Professoren des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering an der Universität Potsdam
Titel der Reihe bis Nummer 119: Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Softwaresystemtechnik an der Universität Potsdam
Die Schriftenreihe Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering (HPI) informieren über laufende Forschungsarbeiten und Projekte der Fachgebiete auf Deutsch und Englisch.
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Year of publication
- 2011 (1)
Document Type
Language
- English (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (1)
Keywords
- Prozesserhebung (1) (remove)
Institute
41
In current practice, business processes modeling is done by trained method experts. Domain experts are interviewed to elicit their process information but not involved in modeling. We created a haptic toolkit for process modeling that can be used in process elicitation sessions with domain experts. We hypothesize that this leads to more effective process elicitation. This paper brakes down "effective elicitation" to 14 operationalized hypotheses. They are assessed in a controlled experiment using questionnaires, process model feedback tests and video analysis. The experiment compares our approach to structured interviews in a repeated measurement design. We executed the experiment with 17 student clerks from a trade school. They represent potential users of the tool. Six out of fourteen hypotheses showed significant difference due to the method applied. Subjects reported more fun and more insights into process modeling with tangible media. Video analysis showed significantly more reviews and corrections applied during process elicitation. Moreover, people take more time to talk and think about their processes. We conclude that tangible media creates a different working mode for people in process elicitation with fun, new insights and instant feedback on preliminary results.