320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (478) (remove)
Keywords
- Germany (31)
- Integration (31)
- Deutschland (27)
- European Union (16)
- Migration (16)
- Poland (15)
- Bürgerschaft (14)
- Consolidation (14)
- Europäische Union (14)
- Polen (14)
- Politische Theorie (14)
- Vertiefung (14)
- Afghanistan (13)
- Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (13)
- International Politics (13)
- Internationale Politik (13)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (13)
- Außenpolitik (12)
- Climate Change Conference (11)
- Durban 2011 (11)
- Entwicklungspolitik (11)
- Interessen (11)
- Klima (11)
- Klimakonferenz (11)
- Klimapolitik (11)
- NGO (11)
- climate (11)
- climate policy (11)
- development policy (11)
- foreign Policy (11)
- national interests (11)
- Armut (10)
- Grundsicherung (10)
- Nachhaltigkeit (10)
- Ressourcen (10)
- decision-making (5)
- international organizations (5)
- Security Council (4)
- authoritarianism (4)
- democracy (4)
- discourse (4)
- governance (4)
- human rights (4)
- institutions (4)
- international organisations (4)
- parliamentary government (4)
- Coordination (3)
- Russia (3)
- United Nations (3)
- World Bank (3)
- bicameralism (3)
- civil war (3)
- counterterrorism (3)
- institutional design (3)
- opposition (3)
- presidential government (3)
- terrorism (3)
- Autoritarismus (2)
- China (2)
- Executive-legislative relations (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Föderalismus (2)
- International (2)
- Komparatistik (2)
- Krisenmanagement (2)
- Liberia (2)
- Local authorities (2)
- Opposition (2)
- Quality management (2)
- REDD (2)
- authority (2)
- capacity (2)
- climate change (2)
- comparative studies (2)
- debt (2)
- digital transformation (2)
- drug control (2)
- expertise (2)
- feminism (2)
- gender (2)
- higher education (2)
- institutional interplay (2)
- international (2)
- international non-governmental organizations (2)
- international public administration (2)
- peacebuilding (2)
- policy (2)
- policy analysis (2)
- political elites (2)
- politische Eliten (2)
- populism (2)
- presidentialism (2)
- race (2)
- semi-parliamentary government (2)
- transitional justice (2)
- violence (2)
- visions of democracy (2)
- 2 degrees C target (1)
- AKP (1)
- Abendland (1)
- Active learning (1)
- Administration (1)
- Administrative reform (1)
- Adoption (1)
- African American literature (1)
- Aid conditionalities (1)
- Air pollution (1)
- Al-Qaida (1)
- Anti-Imperialismus (1)
- Antisemitism (1)
- Argentina (1)
- Autocratic regimes (1)
- Autokratische Regime (1)
- BSW (1)
- Bedrohungsvorstellung (1)
- Behördenrufnummer D115 (1)
- Benchmarking (1)
- Bioethik (1)
- Buenos Aires (1)
- Bundesländer (1)
- CDM (1)
- CESCR Committee (1)
- CORONA-Krise (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Cabinet (1)
- Carl Schmitt (1)
- Catholicism (1)
- Chancengleichheit (1)
- Character (1)
- Circular argumentation (1)
- Cities (1)
- Civil service career (1)
- Civil society (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Climate change adaptation (1)
- Climate governance (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Conseil de sécurité (1)
- Consejo de Seguridad (1)
- Constitutive Mechanism (1)
- Coordination structures (1)
- Counterterrorism (1)
- Country experience (1)
- Decoloniale Theorie (1)
- Development aid (1)
- Development aid End of history (1)
- Development aid criticism (1)
- Dicranopteris linearis (1)
- E-Government (1)
- Eastern Europe (1)
- Economic policy (1)
- Edouard Glissant (1)
- Education (1)
- Electoral systems (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Erde (1)
- Erdogan (1)
- Eurasian Economic Union (1)
- Eurobarometer (1)
- Eurocentrism (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Neighbourhood Policy (1)
- Evidence-based policy making (1)
- Evolutionary economics (1)
- Expert Authority (1)
- Extreme weather (1)
- Federal administration (1)
- Feminismus (1)
- Feministische Philosophie (1)
- Ferdinand von Schirach (1)
- Finanzrisiken (1)
- Folter (1)
- Foreign policy (1)
- Forms of government (1)
- Forschungsfreiheit (1)
- Forschungsmethoden (1)
- GREVIO (1)
- Galwan Valley (1)
- Game (1)
- German science council (1)
- Gesetzgebung (1)
- Global South (1)
- Global warming potential (1)
- Gobernanza de los Comités (1)
- Green infrastructure investment (1)
- HFCS (1)
- Hackathon (1)
- Higher education (1)
- Hochkommissariat für Menschenrechte (OHCHR) (1)
- IHL (1)
- IHRL (1)
- IMF (1)
- INGOs (1)
- ISIS (1)
- Impartiality (1)
- Income (1)
- India (1)
- Indo-Pacific (1)
- Infant mortality (1)
- Informal and formal (1)
- Integration strategy (1)
- Interdisciplinary research (1)
- Interdisziplinarität (1)
- International Bureaucracies (1)
- International Financial Institutions (1)
- International Practices (1)
- International bureaucrats (1)
- International cooperation (1)
- International policy (1)
- International relations (1)
- Internationalisierung (1)
- Irak (1)
- Iran (1)
- Iraq (1)
- Islam (1)
- Israeli-Palestinian conflict (1)
- Istanbul Convention (1)
- Jawaharlal Nehru (1)
- Kindersterblichkeit (1)
- Klimakrise (1)
- Krise (1)
- Kyrgyzstan (1)
- Landscape planning (1)
- Landtage (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legislative organisation (1)
- Legislative process (1)
- Legitimation strategies (1)
- Legitimationsstrategien (1)
- Legitimität (1)
- Lieferkettengesetz (1)
- Lifetime income (1)
- Local administrative systems (1)
- Local autonomy (1)
- Local government reform (1)
- Longitudinal and panel data (1)
- Lucha antiterrorista (1)
- Managerial autonomy (1)
- Market failure (1)
- Max Weber (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Measurement theory (1)
- Media (1)
- Mehrebenensystem (1)
- Meinungsbildung (1)
- Menschen- rechtserklärungen/-übereinkommen (1)
- Menschenrechte (1)
- Methane (1)
- Methodenpluralismus (1)
- Methodological pluralism (1)
- Migrants (1)
- Ministries (1)
- Missing rich (1)
- Mixed methods (1)
- Monetary Fund (1)
- Multilevel system (1)
- Multilevel-Governance (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- NATO (1)
- Nachwuchsförderung (1)
- National state communication (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Neoliberalism (1)
- Neutrality (1)
- New public management (1)
- Nicht-Beherrschung (1)
- Nicht-ideale Theorie (1)
- Nigeria (1)
- Non-equilibrium economics (1)
- Norm collisions (1)
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (1)
- Open Governance (1)
- Operation Euphrates Shield (1)
- Organisations (1)
- Organizational change (1)
- Orthodoxy (1)
- P/CVE (1)
- PID (1)
- Pakistan (1)
- Palestine (1)
- Pareto distribution (1)
- Paris Agreement (1)
- Paris agreement (1)
- Parliamentary questions (1)
- Peacebuilding (1)
- Performance (1)
- Permanent income (1)
- Policy (1)
- Policy advice (1)
- Policy recommendations (1)
- Policymaking (1)
- Political civil servant (1)
- Political craft (1)
- Political economy Socio-economic development (1)
- Political establishment (1)
- Politicisation (1)
- Politikberatung (1)
- Populism (1)
- Populismus (1)
- Potassium (1)
- Precedent (1)
- President Trump (1)
- Price floor (1)
- Price review (1)
- Proceso debido (1)
- Promoting young researchers (1)
- Protestantism (1)
- Public opinion (1)
- Public-private partnerships (1)
- QCA (1)
- Quad (1)
- Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (1)
- Rankings (1)
- Ratchet Effect (1)
- Recipient performance (1)
- Reform (1)
- Regional states (1)
- Religionsfreiheit (1)
- Republikanismus (1)
- Research methods (1)
- Responsibility to Protect (1)
- Rio Conventions (1)
- Risikoauferlegung (1)
- Russland (1)
- Sanciones de la ONU (1)
- Sanktionen (1)
- Serene Khader (1)
- Short-lived climate pollutants (1)
- Sicherheitsrat (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
- Simmel (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Social class (1)
- Social development (1)
- Soziale Entwicklung (1)
- Staatliche Leistungsfähigkeit (1)
- Stammzellforschung (1)
- Sub-Sahara Africa (1)
- Sudan (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Survey (1)
- Sustainability indicators (1)
- System failure (1)
- Systemisches Risiko (1)
- Terrorismus (1)
- Transformation (1)
- Trump phenomenon (1)
- Turkish military in Syria (1)
- Turkish politics (1)
- Types of democracy (1)
- UN (1)
- UN Security Council (1)
- UN human rights treaty bodies (1)
- UN sanctions (1)
- UN-REDD (1)
- Ukraine (1)
- Ukraine war (1)
- Ultimatum (1)
- Universalismus (1)
- Verschwindenlassen (1)
- Verwaltungsmodernisierung (1)
- Weak and strong sustainability (1)
- Wealth distribution (1)
- Weber (1)
- Weberian bureaucracy (1)
- West Africa (1)
- Wicked problems (1)
- Wissenschaftsrat (1)
- Yiddish culturalism (1)
- academic disengagement (1)
- acteurs non-étatiques (1)
- administración pública (1)
- administration (1)
- administration publique (1)
- administrative culture (1)
- advocacy coalitions (1)
- agency (1)
- agent-based modeling (1)
- agentes no estatales (1)
- al-Bab Battle (1)
- anthropocene (1)
- antifeminist (1)
- authoritarian resilience (1)
- authoritarian rule (1)
- balancing (1)
- bias (1)
- border regime (1)
- borders (1)
- boundary spanning (1)
- bullying (1)
- burden of disease (1)
- bureaucraties internationales (1)
- burocracias internacionales (1)
- capabilities framework (1)
- child labour (1)
- childcare (1)
- citizen participation (1)
- citizenship (1)
- civil service survey (1)
- climate and energy policy (1)
- climate change mitigation (1)
- climate mitigation (1)
- climate politics (1)
- closing civic space (1)
- collaboration (1)
- collective memory (1)
- committee governance (1)
- comparative (1)
- comparative development (1)
- comparative environmental politics (1)
- competition (1)
- competitiveness (1)
- complex problems (1)
- concept of the political (1)
- conduct of life (1)
- conflict (1)
- conflict management (1)
- conflict resolution (1)
- consensus democracy (1)
- constitution-making (1)
- containment (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- contestation (1)
- contractor/provider split (1)
- cooperation (1)
- crises (1)
- crisis (1)
- crisis management (1)
- cross-national (1)
- culture (1)
- cyber-attack (1)
- cyberwar (1)
- data and methods (1)
- de facto authority (1)
- de jure authority (1)
- death (1)
- death penalty (1)
- decadence (1)
- decarbonization (1)
- decentralization (1)
- delegation (1)
- democratic performance (1)
- democratization (1)
- depression (1)
- developing countries (1)
- dictatorship (1)
- difference-in-differences (1)
- digital overload (1)
- digitalisation (1)
- digitalization (1)
- direct democracy (1)
- disability-adjusted life years (1)
- discrimination (1)
- discriminatory dimensions of forced evictions (1)
- diversified quality production (1)
- doctrine (1)
- domestic politics (1)
- due process (1)
- e-government (1)
- earth system governance (1)
- ecological modernization (1)
- effective district magnitude (1)
- elections (1)
- electoral systems (1)
- employment (1)
- energy (1)
- ensuring state (1)
- environmental agreements (1)
- environmental degradation (1)
- environmental governance (1)
- environmental mainstreaming (1)
- environmental policy (1)
- environmental policy effects (1)
- environmental policy performance (1)
- epistemic injustice (1)
- executive head (1)
- executive personalism (1)
- executive-parties dimension (1)
- executives (1)
- experiment (1)
- expert authority (1)
- expert recommendations (1)
- far right (1)
- fern (1)
- field experiment (1)
- financial policy (1)
- fisheries policy (1)
- flexibility (1)
- food security governance (1)
- forced evictions (1)
- foreign policy (1)
- gender equality (1)
- gender mainstreaming (1)
- genre (1)
- geographical proximity (1)
- global (1)
- global commons (1)
- global environmental governance (1)
- global governance (1)
- global health (1)
- global public policy (1)
- global south (1)
- globalization (1)
- gouvernance de comité (1)
- government formation (1)
- government policymaking (1)
- green finance (1)
- hackathon (1)
- health security (1)
- health services (1)
- hermeneutical capability (1)
- hermeneutical injustice (1)
- heterogeneity (1)
- history (1)
- huella ecológica (1)
- human rights treaty monitoring bodies (1)
- human trafficking (1)
- identity (1)
- impact evaluation (1)
- incels (1)
- individual complaints procedures (1)
- industrial organization (1)
- industrial relations (1)
- industrial restructuring (1)
- innovation (1)
- institutional investors (1)
- institutional processes (1)
- institutional theory (1)
- inter-governmental relations (1)
- inter-organizational control (1)
- inter-organizational order (1)
- inter-organizational relations (1)
- intergovernmental treaty secretariats (1)
- international administration (1)
- international bureaucracies (1)
- international bureaucracy (1)
- international development (1)
- international human rights (1)
- international humanitarian law (1)
- international institutions (1)
- international law (1)
- international organisation (1)
- interpretative declarations (1)
- intertextuality (1)
- job autonomy (1)
- job demands-resources model (1)
- job satisfaction (1)
- knowledge (1)
- land management (1)
- law and technology (1)
- legislatures (1)
- legitimacy (1)
- lifestyle (1)
- local government (1)
- lutte contre le terrorisme (1)
- male supremacy (1)
- manosphere (1)
- manufacturing (1)
- marginality (1)
- margins of error (1)
- marine governance (1)
- marketization (1)
- men's rights (1)
- micro-credit (1)
- minority rights (1)
- misogyny (1)
- mixed methods (1)
- modernización ecológica (1)
- monopoly of legitimate use of force (1)
- mots clés (1)
- multi-level government (1)
- multi-level study (1)
- multi-level system (1)
- multi-party systems (1)
- multilateral (1)
- multilateralism (1)
- multiplicity (1)
- municipally owned corporation (1)
- narratives (1)
- national ecological footprint (1)
- nationalism (1)
- nativism (1)
- natural climate solutions (1)
- neo-liberalism (1)
- neue Parteien (1)
- new democracies (1)
- new parties (1)
- new technologies (1)
- nineteenth and twentieth century (1)
- non-alignment; (1)
- non-state actors (1)
- nonstate actors (1)
- norm collisions (1)
- norms (1)
- open governance (1)
- orchestration (1)
- organisations internationales (1)
- organizaciones internacionales (1)
- organization theory (1)
- organizational fields (1)
- organizational reform (1)
- organizational reputation (1)
- organizations (1)
- palabras clave (1)
- parental leave (1)
- parenthood (1)
- parliamentarism (1)
- parliamentary democracy (1)
- parliamentary opposition (1)
- party competition (1)
- peace (1)
- peace process (1)
- peacekeeping (1)
- performance (1)
- peripherality (1)
- personal data (1)
- personality (1)
- phytolith (1)
- planetarity (1)
- planetary boundaries (1)
- planning (1)
- policy advice (1)
- policy agendas (1)
- policy output (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy scope (1)
- policy signals (1)
- policy strategy (1)
- policy substitutes (1)
- policy-making (1)
- policy-profession conflict (1)
- political campaigns (1)
- political equality (1)
- political preferences (1)
- political repression (1)
- political sociology (1)
- political stability (1)
- political symbols (1)
- politics of relation (1)
- politische Bildung (1)
- politische Einstellung (1)
- politische Kultur (1)
- política ambiental comparada (1)
- pooling (1)
- post-Soviet (1)
- post-conflict peace (1)
- power (1)
- precedent (1)
- preferences (1)
- privacy (1)
- problem-solving (1)
- process tracing (1)
- procédure officielle (1)
- production concepts (1)
- proportionality analysis (1)
- protection (1)
- protest (1)
- proxy force (1)
- public (1)
- public administration (1)
- public good (1)
- public health (1)
- public opinion (1)
- public opinion polls (1)
- public participation (1)
- public value (1)
- public values (1)
- quality management (1)
- racial discrimination (1)
- racism (1)
- radical (1)
- radicalization (1)
- rationalism (1)
- reasonableness (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- regime complexity (1)
- regional organizations (1)
- regulación estatal (1)
- regulation (1)
- regulations (1)
- renewable energy (1)
- representation (1)
- research (1)
- research communication (1)
- reservations to human rights treaties (1)
- resilience (1)
- resistance (1)
- responsibility (1)
- restoration (1)
- restrictions to civil society (1)
- revolution (1)
- right parties and movements (1)
- right to housing (1)
- romance (1)
- sanctions (1)
- sanctions committee (1)
- sanctions de l’ONU (1)
- scholar-practitioners (1)
- second chambers (1)
- second-order compliance (1)
- security–development nexus (1)
- selection (1)
- self-employed women (1)
- semi-parliamentarism (1)
- separation of powers (1)
- service provider strategies (1)
- set theory (1)
- single mothers (1)
- skills (1)
- social epistemology (1)
- societal impact of research (1)
- space (1)
- start-up subsidies (1)
- state (1)
- state repression (1)
- state security (1)
- stochastic uncertainty (1)
- strategic uncertainty (1)
- structural change (1)
- survey (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survival analysis (1)
- sustainable economy (1)
- symbolic representation (1)
- teaching (1)
- telework (1)
- termination (1)
- trade-offs (1)
- transdisciplinarity (1)
- transition economies (1)
- transition policy (1)
- transnational city networks (1)
- transnational governance (1)
- transnational institutional interplay (1)
- treadmill of production (1)
- triple nexus (1)
- trust (1)
- turnout (1)
- un-cancelling the future (1)
- urban warfare (1)
- veto players (1)
- vote choice (1)
- vote switching (1)
- welfare state benefits (1)
- wicked problems (1)
- window of opportunity (1)
- women's empowerment (1)
- work (1)
- work-family policies (1)
- work-place behavior (1)
- working hours (1)
- working time (1)
- world bank (1)
- world literature (1)
- world-makers (1)
- Öffentliche Verwaltung (1)
Institute
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (183)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (146)
- Sozialwissenschaften (44)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (38)
- Moses Mendelssohn Zentrum für europäisch-jüdische Studien e. V. (14)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (13)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (10)
- Extern (8)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (8)
- Historisches Institut (7)
This article investigates local perceptions of international peacebuilding in Sierra Leone and Liberia and explains the need for an inclusive framework addressing peace and justice at the same time. These neighbouring countries in West Africa not only share the burden of an intertwined conflict history but have also been described as prototypes for successful peacebuilding. However, both cases show striking differences with regard to the relative importance given to security and justice during the peace process and within the selected peacebuilding approaches. In Liberia, the peacebuilding framework was clearly sequenced, favouring security over justice. In Sierra Leone, it included a comprehensive TJ component, which was implemented alongside security-centred initiatives. In order to compare these two cases and to elaborate on the challenges of establishing both peace and justice in post-conflict settings with a more people-centred focus, we conducted expert interviews with (inter)national peacebuilding actors and opinion surveys, asking how the civilian populations themselves perceive the peace process and the effectiveness of international peacebuilding. The findings provide insights into local experiences with the inclusive peacebuilding framework implemented in Sierra Leone and the drawbacks of delaying justice and accountability in Liberia.
Scholars of international relations and public administration widely assume that international bureaucracies, in their role as policy advisors, directly influence countries' domestic policies. Yet, this is not true across the board. Why do some countries closely consider the advice of international bureaucracies while others do not? This article argues that international bureaucracies' standing as sources of expertise is crucial. We tested this argument using data from a unique survey that measured prevalent practices of advice utilization in thematically specialized policy units of national ministries in a representative sample of more than a hundred countries. Our findings show that ministries' perceptions of international bureaucracies' expertise, that is, specialized and reliable knowledge, are the key factor. International bureaucracies influence national ministries directly and without the support of other actors that may also have an interest in the international bureaucracies' policy advice. Our analysis also demonstrates that the effects of alternative means of influence, such as third-party pressure and coercion, are themselves partly dependent on international bureaucracies' reputation as experts. The findings presented in this article reinforce the emphasis on expertise as a source of international bureaucracies' influence, and provide a crucial test of its importance.
Digitales Versammlungsrecht?
(2021)
Das Grundrecht der Versammlungsfreiheit ist bekanntermaßen entwicklungsoffen. Geschützt werden also nicht nur historisch gewachsene „klassische“ Versammlungstypen. Immer wieder zeigen sich neuartige Erscheinungsformen, die es in den Schutzbereich des Art. GG Artikel 8 GG einzuordnen gilt. Aus jüngerer Zeit sind etwa Flashmobs oder Demonstrationen auf Schienen zur Fussnote 1 und mit Wohnmobilen zur Fussnote 2 zu nennen. Diskutiert werden auch Online-Versammlungen, bei denen die Teilnehmenden vollständig auf ein körperliches Zusammentreffen verzichten und sich nur virtuell via Computer oder Smartphone zusammenschalten. Angesichts absoluter und relativer Versammlungsverbote in coronabedingten Lockdowns zur Fussnote 3 steht mehr denn je die verfassungsrechtliche Dimension dieserart nichtphysischer Zusammentreffen im Streit. Der Beitrag befasst sich daher mit der Frage, ob die Versammlungsfreiheit des Art. GG Artikel 8 GG im digitalen Zeitalter auch eine virtuelle Seite hat.
The chapter analyses recent reforms in the multilevel system of the Länder, specifically territorial, functional and structural reforms, which represent three of the most crucial and closely interconnected reform trajectories at the subnational level. It sheds light on the variety of reform approaches pursued in the different Länder and also highlights some factors that account for these differences. The transfer of state functions to local governments is addressed as well as the restructuring of Länder administrations (e.g. abolishment of the meso level of the Länder administration and of single-purpose state agencies) and the rescaling of territorial boundaries at county and municipal levels, including a brief review of the recently failed (territorial) reforms in Eastern Germany.
Aporien des Rechts
(2021)
Although German bureaucracy is typically categorised as Weberian, a clear distinction between politics and administration has never been a defining characteristic of the German political-administrative system. Many close interrelations and interactions between elected politicians and appointed civil servants can be observed at all levels of administration. Higher-ranking civil servants in Germany are used to and generally appreciate the functional politicisation of their jobs, that is their close involvement in all stages of the policy process, from policy formation, goal definition, negotiation within and outside government to the implementation and evaluation of policies. For top positions, therefore, a class of ‘political civil servants’ is a special feature of the German system, and obtaining ‘political craft’ has become an important part of the learning and job experience of higher-ranking civil servants.
Over the last decades, Better Regulation has become a major reform topic at the federal and—in some cases—also at the Länder level. Although the debate about improving regulatory quality and reducing unnecessary burdens created by bureaucracy and red tape date back to the 1960s and 1970s, the introduction by law in 2006 of a new independent institutionalised body for regulatory control at the federal level of government has brought a new quality to the discourse and practice of Better Regulation in Germany. This chapter introduces the basic features of the legislative process at the federal level in Germany, addresses the issue of Better Regulation and outlines the role of the National Regulatory Control Council (Nationaler Normenkontrollrat—NKR) as a ‘watchdog’ for compliance costs, red tape and regulatory impacts.
Extreme weather events like heavy rainfall and heat waves will likely increase in intensity and frequency due to climate change. As the impacts of these extremes are particularly prominent in urban agglomerations, cities face an urgent need to develop adaptation strategies. Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) provides helpful strategies that harness ecological processes in addition to technical interventions. EbA has been addressed in informal adaptation planning. Formal municipality planning, namely landscape planning, is supposed to include traditionally some EbA measures, although adaptation has not been their explicit focus. Our research aims to investigate how landscape plans incorporate climate-related extremes and EbA as well as to discuss the potential to enhance EbA uptake in formal planning. We conducted a document analysis of informal planning documents from 85 German cities and the analysis of formal landscape plans of 61 of these cities. The results suggest that city size does affect the extent of informal planning instruments and the comprehensiveness of formal landscape plans. Climate-related extremes and EbA measures have traditionally been part of landscape planning. Almost all landscape plans address heat stress, while climate change and heavy rain have been addressed less often, though more frequently since 2008. Greening of walls and roofs, on-site infiltration and water retention reveal significant potential for better integration in landscape plans. Landscape planning offers an entry point for effective climate adaptation through EbA in cities. Informal and formal planning instruments should be closely combined for robust, spatially explicit, legally binding implementation of EbA measures in the future.
Personal data increasingly serve as inputs to public goods. Like other types of contributions to public goods, personal data are likely to be underprovided. We investigate whether classical remedies to underprovision are also applicable to personal data and whether the privacy-sensitive nature of personal data must be additionally accounted for. In a randomized field experiment on a public online education platform, we prompt users to complete their profiles with personal information. Compared to a control message, we find that making public benefits salient increases the number of personal data contributions significantly. This effect is even stronger when additionally emphasizing privacy protection, especially for sensitive information. Our results further suggest that emphasis on both public benefits and privacy protection attracts personal data from a more diverse set of contributors.
Climate change threatens to undermine efforts to eradicate extreme poverty. However, climate policies could impose a financial burden on the global poor through increased energy and food prices. Here, we project poverty rates until 2050 and assess how they are influenced by mitigation policies consistent with the 1.5 degrees C target. A continuation of historical trends will leave 350 million people globally in extreme poverty by 2030. Without progressive redistribution, climate policies would push an additional 50 million people into poverty. However, redistributing the national carbon pricing revenues domestically as an equal-per-capita climate dividend compensates this policy side effect, even leading to a small net reduction of the global poverty headcount (-6 million). An additional international climate finance scheme enables a substantial poverty reduction globally and also in Sub-Saharan Africa. Combining national redistribution with international climate finance thus provides an important entry point to climate policy in developing countries. Ambitious climate policies can negatively impact the global poor by affecting income, food and energy prices. Here, the authors quantify this effect, and show that it can be compensated by national redistribution of the carbon pricing revenues in combination with international climate finance.
In this article, I give an overview on nativist street protests in Germany from the early nineteenth century to the present from an historical perspective. In a preliminary re-mark, I will reflect on some recent developments in Germany, where nativist protest campaigns against immigration took place in the streets when voters were turning towards the populist radical right party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). In the first section, I will outline an older tradition of anti-immigration protest in nineteenth and early twentieth century Germany, which is closely connected to modern antisemitism. In sections two and three, I will retrace how, from the late 1960s onward, the far right in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) discovered concerns about immigra-tion in the German population, addressed them in protest campaigns and developed narratives to integrate such sentiments into a broader right-wing extremist ideology, itself deeply rooted in antisemitism. Studying nativism and the radical right from an actor-oriented perspective, I will focus on traditionalist movements, including the Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (NPD) and neo-Nazi groups.
Die vorliegende Research Note stellt die erste systematische Dokumentation der Gesetzgebung in den deutschen Landtagen vor. Der Datensatz umfasst insgesamt 16.610 dokumentierte Gesetzgebungsvorgänge zwischen den Jahren 1990 und 2020. Nach einer Beschreibung des Datensatzes werden einige Gesetzgebungsmuster in den deutschen Ländern exemplarisch dargestellt. Die Landesgesetzgebung erweist sich dabei als stark durch den neuen Dualismus zwischen Regierung und Opposition geprägt. Im Initiativverhalten lassen sich zudem die Anreize des thematischen Parteienwettbewerbs ablesen. Wenig Evidenz findet sich für die These, dass innerkoalitionäre Gegensätze die Dauer der Gesetzgebungsverfahren in die Länge ziehen. Der mit dieser Research Note veröffentlichte Datensatz steht der Forschung für die Untersuchung zahlreicher weiterer Fragestellungen zur Verfügung.
Obwohl seit der Finanzkrise 2008 systemische Finanzrisiken das Objekt zahlreicher wissenschaftlicher Studien waren, hat die Frage, unter welchen Bedingungen und Umständen die Auferlegung eines systemischen Finanzrisikos moralisch unzulässig ist, bisher kaum Beachtung gefunden. Ziel dieses Aufsatzes ist es, eine Reihe von normativen Kriterien für die Einschätzung der moralischen Unzulässigkeit von systemischen Risiken zu entwickeln. Darüber hinaus wird argumentiert, dass staatliche und andere relevante Institutionen zwei zentrale Pflichten hinsichtlich des Umgangs mit systemischen Finanzrisiken haben: eine Schutzpflicht gegenüber allen Bürger*innen und eine Sorgfaltspflicht, um die diesen Institutionen obliegenden Kontroll- und Aufsichtsfunktionen verantwortungsvoll auszuüben.
International organizations (IOs) experience significant variation in their decision-making performance, or the extent to which they produce policy output. While some IOs are efficient decision-making machineries, others are plagued by deadlock. How can such variation be explained? Examining this question, the article makes three central contributions. First, we approach performance by looking at IO decision-making in terms of policy output and introduce an original measure of decision-making performance that captures annual growth rates in IO output. Second, we offer a novel theoretical explanation for decision-making performance. This account highlights the role of institutional design, pointing to how majoritarian decision rules, delegation of authority to supranational institutions, and access for transnational actors (TNAs) interact to affect decision-making. Third, we offer the first comparative assessment of the decision-making performance of IOs. While previous literature addresses single IOs, we explore decision-making across a broad spectrum of 30 IOs from 1980 to 2011. Our analysis indicates that IO decision-making performance varies across and within IOs. We find broad support for our theoretical account, showing the combined effect of institutional design features in shaping decision-making performance. Notably, TNA access has a positive effect on decision-making performance when pooling is greater, and delegation has a positive effect when TNA access is higher. We also find that pooling has an independent, positive effect on decision-making performance. All-in-all, these findings suggest that the institutional design of IOs matters for their decision-making performance, primarily in more complex ways than expected in earlier research.
While a growing body of literature finds positive impacts of Start-Up Subsidies (SUS) on labor market outcomes of participants, little is known about how the design of these programs shapes their effectiveness and hence how to improve policy. As experimental variation in program design is unavailable, we exploit the 2011 reform of the current German SUS program for the unemployed which strengthened caseworkers' discretionary power, increased entry requirements and reduced monetary support. We estimate the impact of the reform on the program's effectiveness using samples of participants and non-participants from before and after the reform. To control for time-constant unobserved heterogeneity as well as differential selection patterns based on observable characteristics over time, we combine Difference-in-Differences with inverse probability weighting using covariate balancing propensity scores. Holding participants' observed characteristics as well as macroeconomic conditions constant, the results suggest that the reform was successful in raising employment effects on average. As these findings may be contaminated by changes in selection patterns based on unobserved characteristics, we assess our results using simulation-based sensitivity analyses and find that our estimates are highly robust to changes in unobserved characteristics. Hence, the reform most likely had a positive impact on the effectiveness of the program, suggesting that increasing entry requirements and reducing support increased the program's impacts while reducing the cost per participant. (C) 2021 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
In this paper, we have two goals. First, we argue for a blueprint for hermeneutical injustice that allows us to schematize existing and discover new varieties of hermeneutical injustices. The underlying insight is that Fricker provides both a general concept of hermeneutical injustice and a specific conception thereof. By distinguishing between the general concept and its specific conceptions, we gain a fruitful tool to detect such injustices in our everyday lives. Second, we use this blueprint to provide a further example of hermeneutical injustice that draws our attention to yet another distinction: Some hermeneutical injustices result from a lack or distortion in the collective conceptual resource and some are due to problems in the application of existing concepts. We argue that to combat hermeneutical injustices, we have to make sure not only that individuals have accurate concepts at their disposal but that they have the capabilities to use these concepts adequately.
Wie hat sich die COVID-19 Pandemie auf geschlechtsspezifische Ungleichheiten im Arbeitsleben und dem subjektiven Wohlbefinden Erwerbstätiger ausgewirkt? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage analysiert dieser Beitrag drei Wellen einer nicht zufallsbasierten Onlinestichprobe für den Zeitraum Mitte März bis Anfang August 2020 und umfassen damit den Zeitraum des ersten Lockdowns. Die Ergebnisse unserer multivariaten Analysen zeigen: Frauen, Eltern und insbesondere Mütter waren überdurchschnittlich von Arbeitszeitreduzierungen betroffen. Bei der Wahrscheinlichkeit im Homeoffice zu arbeiten gab es nur geringfügige Unterschiede nach Geschlecht und Familiensituation. Die Zufriedenheit mit der Arbeit, dem Familienleben und dem Leben insgesamt ging bei Frauen, Eltern und insbesondere Müttern überproportional stark zurück. Die beobachteten Unterschiede verringern sich gegen Ende des Lockdowns wieder, jedoch unterschiedlich stark für die einzelnen Ergebnisdimensionen.
Kollaborative, partizipative Instrumente zur Krisenbekämpfung haben in den letzten Jahren zunehmend an Aufmerksamkeit gewonnen. Ein Beispiel hierfür ist der #WirVsVirus-Hackathon, der als Reaktion auf die COVID-19-Pandemie durchgeführt wurde und über 28.000 Teilnehmer:innen erreichte. Bislang wurden die Auswirkungen solch groß angelegter, kollaborativer Ansätze zur Krisenbewältigung auf staatliches Krisenmanagement nur selten untersucht. Diese Studie analysiert den Hackathon und die daraus entstandenen Projekte aus der Perspektive des Open Governance-Paradigmas. Auf Grundlage von neun Experteninterviews untersuchen wir, wie sich digitale Open Governance auf die Regierungsfähigkeit und Legitimität in Krisenzeiten auswirkt. Unsere Analyse zeigt, dass digitale Open Governance zur Leistungsfähigkeit und Legitimität staatlichen Handelns in Krisenzeiten beitragen kann, da solche Projekte eine breite und diverse Teilnehmerschaft mobilisieren und in kurzer Zeit bürgerzentrierte, nutzbare Lösungen für krisenbezogene Probleme entwickeln können. Dem stehen allerdings Zweifel an der langfristigen Beständigkeit der Projekte, ihrer Skalierbarkeit, sowie Risiken hinsichtlich der Legitimität und Rechenschaftspflicht entgegen.
This cross-country comparison of administrative responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden is aimed at exploring how institutional contexts and administrative cultures have shaped strategies of problem-solving and governance modes during the pandemic, and to what extent the crisis has been used for opportunity management. The article shows that in France, the central government reacted determinedly and hierarchically, with tough containment measures. By contrast, the response in Germany was characterized by an initial bottom-up approach that gave way to remarkable federal unity in the further course of the crisis, followed again by a return to regional variance and local discretion. In Sweden, there was a continuation of 'normal governance' and a strategy of relying on voluntary compliance largely based on recommendations and less - as in Germany and France - on a strategy of imposing legally binding regulations. The comparative analysis also reveals that relevant stakeholders in all three countries have used the crisis as an opportunity for changes in the institutional settings and administrative procedures.
Points for practitioners
COVID-19 has shown that national political and administrative standard operating procedures in preparation for crises are, at best, partially helpful. Notwithstanding the fact that dealing with the unpredictable is a necessary part of crisis management, a need to further improve the institutional preparedness for pandemic crises in all three countries examined here has also become clear. This should be done particularly by way of shifting resources to the health and care sectors, strengthening the decentralized management of health emergencies, stocking and/or self-producing protection material, assessing the effects of crisis measures, and opening the scientific discourse to broader arenas of experts.
German Public Administration
(2021)
The international community of public administration and administrative sciences shows a great interest in the basic features of the German administrative system. The German public administration with its formative decentralisation (called: administrative federalism) is regarded as a prime example of multilevel governance and strong local self-government. Furthermore, over the past decades, the traditional profile of the German administrative system has significantly been reshaped and remoulded through reforms, processes of modernisation and the transformation process in East Germany. Studies on the German administrative system should focus especially on
key institutional features of public administration;
changing relationships between public administration, society and the private sector;
administrative reforms at different levels of the federal system; and
new challenges and modernisation approaches, such as digitalisation, open government and better regulation.
This chapter describes the most prominent public management reform trajectories in German public administration over the past decades since unification. In the 1990s, the New Steering Model emerged as a German variant of the NPM. Since the mid-2000s, local governments in Germany have been subjected to a mandatory reform of their budgeting and accounting system known as the New Municipal Financial Management reforms. Both reforms have led to a substantial change in terms of internal decentralisation, customer orientation, transparency in resource use and the financial situation of administrative bodies. But the emerging reform patterns and their impacts have not replaced the dominance of a strong legalist culture with hierarchical, centralised control. However, in the course of the reforms, a citizen-customer perspective, more participation of citizens and limited application of new management instruments have been accommodated within the persisting bureaucratic system.
Human resource management (HRM) reform has not been the focus of attention in Germany despite its obvious relevance for effective policy implementation. Although there is a general trend worldwide towards convergence between public and private HRM strategies and practices, management of the workforce in German public administration still remains largely traditional and bureaucratic. This chapter describes and analyses German practices regarding the central functions and elements of HRM such as planning, recruitment, training and leadership. Furthermore, it explores the importance and contribution of public service motivation, performance-related pay and diversity management in the context of German practices. The chapter concludes by highlighting some of the major paradoxes of German public HRM in light of current challenges, such as demographic change, digital transformation and organisational development capabilities.
Gender at the crossroads
(2021)
Since the early 2000s, the United Nations (UN) global counterterrorism architecture has seen significant changes towards increased multilateralism, a focus on prevention, and inter-institutional coordination across the UN’s three pillars of work. Throughout this reform process, gender aspects have increasingly become presented as a “cross-cutting” theme. In this article, I investigate the role of gender in the UN’s counterterrorism reform process at the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, or “triple nexus”, from a feminist institutionalist perspective. I conduct a feminist discourse analysis of the counterterrorism discourses of three UN entities, which represent the different UN pillars of peace and security (DPO), development (UNDP), and humanitarianism and human rights (OHCHR). The article examines the role of gender in the inter-institutional reform process by focusing on the changes, overlaps and differences in the discursive production of gender in the entities’ counterterrorism agendas over time and in two recent UN counterterrorism conferences. I find that gendered dynamics of nested newness and institutional layering have played an essential role both as a justification for the involvement of individual entities in counterterrorism and as a vehicle for inter-institutional cooperation and struggle for discursive power.
The German system of public sector employment (including civil servants and public employees) qualifies as a classical European continental civil service model moulded in traditional forms of a Weberian bureaucracy. Its features include a career-based employment system with entry based on levels of formal qualification. Coordinated by legal frames and centralised collective bargaining, the civil service is, at the same time, decentralised and flexible enough to accommodate regional differences and societal changes. In comparison, the civil service system stands out for its high degrees of professionalism and legal fairness with low levels of corruption or cronyism.
Clubs of autocrats
(2021)
While scholars have argued that membership in Regional Organizations (ROs) can increase the likelihood of democratization, we see many autocratic regimes surviving in power albeit being members of several ROs. This article argues that this is the case because these regimes are often members in "Clubs of Autocrats" that supply material and ideational resources to strengthen domestic survival politics and shield members from external interference during moments of political turmoil. The argument is supported by survival analysis testing the effect of membership in autocratic ROs on regime survival between 1946 to 2010. It finds that membership in ROs composed of more autocratic member states does in fact raise the likelihood of regime survival by protecting incumbents against democratic challenges such as civil unrest or political dissent. However, autocratic RO membership does not help to prevent regime breakdown due to autocratic challenges like military coups, potentially because these types of threats are less likely to diffuse to other member states. The article thereby adds to our understanding of the limits of democratization and potential reverse effects of international cooperation, and contributes to the literature addressing interdependences of international and domestic politics in autocratic regimes.
Donors of development assistance for health typically provide funding for a range of disease focus areas, such as maternal health and child health, malaria, HIV/AIDS, and other infectious diseases. But funding for each disease category does not match closely its contribution to the disability and loss of life it causes and the cost-effectiveness of interventions. We argue that peer influences in the social construction of global health priorities contribute to explaining this misalignment. Aid policy-makers are embedded in a social environment encompassing other donors, health experts, advocacy groups, and international officials. This social environment influences the conceptual and normative frameworks of decision-makers, which in turn affect their funding priorities. Aid policy-makers are especially likely to emulate decisions on funding priorities taken by peers with whom they are most closely involved in the context of expert and advocacy networks. We draw on novel data on donor connectivity through health IGOs and health INGOs and assess the argument by applying spatial regression models to health aid disbursed globally between 1990 and 2017. The analysis provides strong empirical support for our argument that the involvement in overlapping expert and advocacy networks shapes funding priorities regarding disease categories and recipient countries in health aid.
World Bank evaluations show that recipient performance varies substantially between different projects. Extant research has focused on country-level variables when explaining these variations. This article goes beyond country-level explanations and highlights the role of World Bank staff. We extend established arguments in the literature on compliance with the demands of International Organizations (IOs) and hypothesize that IO staff can shape recipient performance in three ways. First, recipient performance may be influenced by the quality of IO staff monitoring and supervision. Second, the leniency and stringency with which IO staff apply the aid agreement could improve recipient performance. Third, recipient performance may depend on whether IO staff can identify and mobilize supportive interlocutors through their networks in the recipient country. We test these arguments by linking a novel database on the tenure of World Bank task team leaders to projects evaluated between 1986 and 2020. The findings are consistent with the expectation that World Bank staff play an important role, but only in investment projects. There is substantial evidence that World Bank staff supervisory ability and country experience are linked to recipient performance in those projects. Less consistent evidence indicates that leniency could matter. These findings imply that World Bank staff play an important role in facilitating implementation of investment projects.
The digitalization of public administration is increasingly moving forward. This systematic literature review analyzes empirical studies that explore the impacts of digitalization projects (n=93) in the public sector. Bibliometrically, only a few authors have published several times on this topic so far. Most studies focusing on impact come from the US or China, and are related to Computer Science. In terms of content, the majority of examined articles studies services to citizens, and therefore consider them when measuring impact. A classification of the investigated effects by dimensions of public value shows that the analysis of utilitarian-instrumental values, such as efficiency or performance, is prevalent. More interdisciplinary cooperation is needed to research the impact of digitalization in the public sector. The different dimensions of impact should be linked more closely. In addition, research should focus more on the effects of digitalization within administration.
Heterogenität
(2020)
Einführung
(2020)
Henrik Ibsen behandelt in seinem Schauspiel Ein Volksfeind (1882) einen Umweltskandal, was das Stück zeitlos aktuell macht. Heutige Inszenierungen können umstandslos an die hier vorgestellten Umweltprobleme und den Umgang damit in der nach dem Mehrheitsprinzip verfahrenden Demokratie anknüpfen. In dem Beitrag wird zunächst der Begriffsgeschichte von „Volksfeind“ nachgegangen, vom Römischen Reich über die Französische Revolution, die totalitären Diktaturen des 20. Jahrhunderts bis zur heutigen Bundesrepublik und den USA. Im Weiteren werden die im Stück thematisierten Verhältnisse von Mehrheit und Minderheit sowie Macht und Recht im politisch-gesellschaftlichen Gefüge vor dem Hintergrund demokratietheoretischer Überlegungen von Alexis die Tocqueville, John Stuart Mill und Emma Goldman untersucht. Schließlich werden die im Volksfeind aufgeworfenen Fragen nach der Möglichkeit von Bildung und politischer Mündigkeit vor dem Hintergrund heutiger postfaktischer Tendenzen, von Politik mit „alternativen Fakten“, Bullshit und Lügen diskutiert.
Eine relevante und höchst aktuelle Überschneidung fachübergreifender und fachspezifischer sprachlicher Phänomene hat Elisabeth Wehling mit ihrem 2016 erschienenen Buch „Politisches Framing“ einer breiten Öffentlichkeit, die weit über fachwissenschaftliche Kreise hinaus geht, dargelegt. Wehling erläutert darin an zahlreichen Beispielen, dass in politischen Debatten und für ihre Wirkung nicht zuerst die vorgetragenen Fakten entscheidend sind, sondern gedankliche Deutungsrahmen — in den Kognitionswissenschaften Frames genannt — die den Fakten eine Bedeutung verleihen. Informationen werden demnach in Relation zu Erfahrungen und Vorwissen als relevant oder irrelevant eingeordnet sowie durch Frames bewertet und interpretiert. Dadurch beeinflussen Frames — häufig unbewusst — Denken und Handeln. (Wehling, S. 17 ff.) Eine Auseinandersetzung mit den von Wehling dargelegten Erkenntnissen im Rahmen des Politikunterrichts ermöglicht die Entwicklung und Förderung von sprachlicher und fachlicher Kompetenz. Dieser Beitrag fasst die von Wehling dargelegten Erkenntnisse zusammen und erläutert das didaktische Potenzial des Themas Politisches Framing anhand kompetenzbezogener Aufgaben für den Politikunterricht.
Dieser Beitrag reflektiert und ergänzt die aktuelle Diskussion über die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats zur Weiterentwicklung der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Wir richten dabei den Blick auf die vom Wissenschaftsrat attestierten Schwachstellen im Bereich empirisch-analytischer Methoden und erläutern ihre Auswirkungen auf Interdisziplinarität, Internationalität und Politikberatung der deutschen Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Wir argumentieren, unter Verweis auf den Bericht des Wissenschaftsrats, dass eine breitere Methodenausbildung und -kenntnis von großer Bedeutung für interdisziplinäre und internationale Zusammenarbeit, aber auch für die Politikberatung ist. Zukünftige Initiativen innerhalb der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung sollten die Methodenvielfalt des Forschungsbereichs angemessen berücksichtigen und einen besonderen Fokus auf die Ausbildung im Bereich empirisch-analytischer Methoden legen, um das Forschungsfeld in diesem Bereich zu stärken. Unser Beitrag entspringt einer Diskussion innerhalb des Arbeitskreises „Empirische Methoden der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung“ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.
How do active learning environments—by means of simulations—enhance political science students’ learning outcomes regarding different levels of knowledge? This paper examines different UN simulations in political science courses to demonstrate their pedagogical value and provide empirical evidence for their effectiveness regarding three levels of knowledge (factual, procedural and soft skills). Despite comprehensive theoretical claims about the positive effects of active learning environments on learning outcomes, substantial empirical evidence is limited. Here, we focus on simulations to systematically test previous claims and demonstrate their pedagogical value. Model United Nations (MUNs) have been a popular teaching device in political science. To gain comprehensive data about the active learning effects of MUNs, we collect data and evaluate three simulations covering the whole range of simulation characteristics: a short in-class simulation of the UN Security Council, a regional MUN with different committees being simulated, and two delegations to the National Model United Nations, for which the students prepare for 1 year. Comparative results prove that simulations need to address certain characteristics in order to produce extensive learning outcomes. Only comprehensive simulations are able to achieve all envisioned learning outcomes regarding factual and procedural knowledge about the UN and soft skills.
Die Manosphere
(2020)
Die sogenannte Manosphere – eine digitale Gemeinschaft, die sich hauptsächlich durch misogyne und antifeministische Beiträge und Ideologien auszeichnet – ist aufgrund ihrer Verbindung zu verschiedenen Terroranschlägen in der letzten Zeit verstärkt in das Blickfeld der Medien gelangt. Dieser Beitrag untersucht die bislang häufig vernachlässigte Rolle digitaler Räume und Netzwerke im Kontext regressiver, frauenfeindlicher Ideologien und daraus erwachsende gewalttätige antifeministische Handlungsrepertoires aus Perspektive der Bewegungsforschung. Am Beispiel der Manosphere auf der Plattform Reddit zeige ich, wie durch das Zusammenspiel zwischen technologischer Infrastruktur und regressiver Ideologie die Grundlage für die Mobilisierung und Sozialisierung in antifeministische Bewegungskulturen mit gewalttätigen Handlungsrepertoires on- und offline geschaffen wird.
The United Nations (UN) policy agenda on Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE) promotes a “holistic” approach to counterterrorism, which includes elements traditionally found in security and development programs. Advocates of the agenda increasingly emphasize the importance of gender mainstreaming for counterterrorism goals. In this article, I scrutinize the merging of the goals of gender equality, security, and development into a global agenda for counterterrorism. A critical feminist discourse-analytical reading of gender representations in P/CVE shows how problematic imageries of women as victims, economic entrepreneurs, and peacemakers from both the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and the Women, Peace and Security agenda are reproduced in core UN documents advocating for a “holistic” P/CVE approach. By highlighting the tensions that are produced by efforts to merge the different gender discourses across the UN’s security and development institutions, the article underlines the relevance of considering the particular position of P/CVE at the security–development nexus for further gender-sensitive analysis and policies of counterterrorism.
Yiddish culture developed in Argentina within the context of a self-perception that figured Buenos Aires as a marginal and peripheral locale on the global Yiddish map. Against this backdrop, Argentine Yiddish culturalists argued for the strengthening of local Yiddish culture with a goal of elevating Buenos Aires's status within the international hierarchies of Yiddish culture. Buenos Aires indeed emerged in the 1920s as a producer of Yiddish cultural contents, maintained networks of international cultural contacts with other Yiddish centers, financially supported Eastern European Yiddish establishments, and hoped that these contacts would allow for solving Buenos Aires reputation problems. The pre-World War II preoccupation with the status of Buenos Aires as a center of Yiddish culture provided a basis upon which post-Holocaust discourse of Argentine Jewish responsibility for the maintenance of Yiddish culture was constructed.
Introduction
(2020)
Does political repression work and if so, under what conditions? Many contributions to the empirical study of non-democratic rule assume it does. As a consequence, strong convictions on political repression abound, but empirical investigations into the matter remain rare. This introduction sets the agenda for the chapters to come and outlines the answers given to the three motivating questions of this volume. First, what variants of political repression are there, and how do they interact? Second, what impact does the interaction of different forms of political repression have on the problem of authoritarian control? Finally, what difference does the complementary use of violence and restrictions make for the problem of authoritarian power-sharing?
This chapter operationalizes the three fundamental concepts of this study. It outlines what counts as authoritarian rule, it explains how to recognize dissent in non-democratic contexts, and it debates how to quantify repression in the shadow of the politicized discourse on human rights. First, the chapter opts to classify every political regime as authoritarian that fails to elect its executive or legislature in free and competitive elections. Second, the chapter proposes to see dissent through the lens of campaigns, i.e., series of connected contentious events that involve large-scale collective action and formulate far-reaching political demands. Finally, after some elaboration on the problems involved in measuring political repression reliably and validly, the chapter turns to rescaled versions of the Human Rights Protection Scores 2.04 and the V-Dem 6.2 political civil liberties index as indicators for violence and restrictions. This choice of indicators of repression is, finally, defended against three central objections: the separability of violence from restrictions, the so-called information paradox, and, finally, differences in the timing of violence and restrictions.
Campaigns against authoritarian rule trigger the problems of authoritarian control and power-sharing. Hence, autocrats cannot ignore campaigns, but can they repress them? This chapter hypothesizes that restrictions and violence do just that—if those forms of political repression complement each other. Each variant of political repression has drawbacks: Restrictions dampen, but they do not eliminate interdependent behavior; violence imposes high individual costs on dissent, but it frequently backfires against its originators. Complementarity asserts that those drawbacks matter less when both variants of repression work in tandem. Statistical analysis of 50 campaigns distributed across 112 authoritarian regimes between 1977 and 2001 yields mixed support for the argument. Based on a binary probit model with sample selection correction, the analysis adds a preemptive and a reactive aspect to political repression. The results imply that complementarity matters as long as repression preempts campaigns, but not when it reacts to them. Moreover, once citizens knock at the palace gates, restrictions turn futile. Finally, violence reduces the outlook for successful resistance against authoritarian rule, but it also backfires at all times—preemptive and reactive. By implication, political repression thwarts successful resistance today, but it breeds more resistance tomorrow.
Does complementarity between restrictions and violence stabilize authoritarian power-sharing in the face of popular rebellion? Scholars widely concur that the central political conflict in authoritarian regimes plays out between people on the inside of the regime. This chapter adds to the debate and studies coup attempts in light of two interconnected hypotheses. First, violence against campaigns destabilizes power-sharing because it exposes a weak leadership. Second, this adverse effect of violence declines as the routine level of restrictions increases, because restrictions act as a sorting mechanism for uncompromising political opposition. Both hypotheses are tested using Bayesian multilevel statistical analysis on a data set of 253 coup attempts in 198 authoritarian regimes between 1949 and 2007. This study design allows separation of repression’s time-dependent effects from its context effects, and it demonstrates the value of Bayesian methods for studying rare political phenomena such as coups d’état. The chapter’s conclusion, however, is straightforward: Once citizens form campaigns, repression can only deteriorate the situation because it opens a frontline right at the center of authoritarian rule.
The past few years have witnessed a growing interest among scholars and policy-makers in the interplay of international bureaucracies with civil society organizations, non-profit entities, and the private sector. Authors concerned with global environmental politics have made considerable progress in capturing this phenomenon. Nevertheless, we still lack in-depth empirical knowledge on the precise nature of such institutional interlinkages across governance levels and scales. Building upon the concept oforchestration, this article focuses on the relationship between specific types of international bureaucracies and actors other than the nation-state. In particular, we investigate how the secretariats of the three Rio Conventions reach out to non-state actors in order to exert influence on the outcome of international environmental negotiations. Our analysis demonstrates that the three intergovernmental treaty secretariats utilize various styles of orchestration in their relation to non-state actors and seek to push the global responses to the respective transboundary environmental problems forward. This article points to a recent trend towards a direct collaboration between these secretariats and non-state actors which gives rise to the idea that new alliances between these actors are emerging in global environmental governance.
Der Diskurs über Sprachbildung beziehungsweise sprachsensiblen Fachunterricht im Bereich der Politischen Bildung ist bislang noch verhalten. Beiträge zu diesem Thema orientieren sich zumeist an der praktischen Umsetzung herangetragener bildungspolitischer Forderungen und übernehmen in der Regel Konzepte für den Fachunterricht im Allgemeinen mit dem Versuch diese für die Politische Bildung zu adaptieren. Eine Theorieentwicklung aus politikdidaktischer Perspektive findet derzeit kaum statt. Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt den bisherigen Diskurs mit Blick auf die Politikdidaktik vor, um im Anschluss Impulse für eine Konzeptionalisierung sprachsensiblen Unterrichts aus Perspektive der Politischen Bildung zu geben.
Die tagespolitische Auseinandersetzung stellt sich als eine Für- und Gegenrede zu politischen Problemen, Herausforderungen oder Handlungsinitiativen dar: Verschiedene Akteure äußern sich kritisch oder befürwortend zu vollzogenen oder geplanten politischen Maßnahmen wie auch – ebenso kritisch oder befürwortend – zu getätigten Äußerungen anderer politischer und medialer Akteure. Insgesamt werden dabei eine Vielzahl von Argumenten mit unterschiedlicher Reichweite und Intensität ausgetauscht, aufgegriffen und verworfen. Der Beitrag argumentiert, dass solche sprachlich verfassten Auseinandersetzungen Legitimationsdiskurse sind, in denen Legitimität anhand normativer Werte verhandelt wird. Dort genutzte Wertkategorien bleiben jedoch deutungsoffen und oft implizit. Um politisches Lernen zu fördern, erweist sich eine gemeinsame Bearbeitung solcher Legitimationsdiskurse als gewinnbringend. Zentral dafür ist, dass Legitimationsargumente in Lehr-Lernarrangements explizit und verhandelbar werden.
Using a novel agent-based model, we study how US withdrawal might influence the political process established by the Paris Agreement, and hence the prospects for reaching the collective goal to limit warming below 2 degrees C. Our model enables us to analyze to what extent reaching this goal despite US withdrawal would place more stringent requirements on other core elements of the Paris cooperation process. We find, first, that the effect of a US withdrawal depends critically on the extent to which member countries reciprocate others' promises and contributions. Second, while the 2 degrees C goal will likely be reached only under a very small set of conditions in any event, even temporary US withdrawal will further narrow this set significantly. Reaching this goal will then require other countries to step up their ambition at the first opportunity and to comply nearly 100% with their pledges, while maintaining high confidence in the Paris Agreements institutions. Third, although a US withdrawal will first primarily affect the United States' own emissions, it will eventually prove even more detrimental to other countries' emissions.