320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (122)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (122) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (122)
Keywords
- Germany (3)
- Integration (3)
- territorial reforms (3)
- Migration (2)
- digitalization (2)
- (post) new public management (1)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Ausländerbehörde (1)
- Auswertung (1)
- Automatisierung (1)
- Berliner Mauer (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
- Changing nature of armed conflict (1)
- China (1)
- Comparative Public Administration (1)
- Covid-19-Pandemie (1)
- Decision Probability (1)
- Demokratieförderung (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Dezentralisierung (1)
- Diskurs (1)
- Diskursanalyse (1)
- Diskurstheorie (1)
- Effektivität (1)
- Egalitarismus (1)
- Emanzipation (1)
- Entscheidungsunterstützung (1)
- Entwicklungstheorien (1)
- Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Eurobarometer (1)
- European Green Deal (1)
- European Union (1)
- Existentialismus (1)
- Flüchtlingskrise (1)
- Freiheit (1)
- Föderalismus (1)
- Gemeinden (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Global order (1)
- Grundwerte (1)
- Informal reform (1)
- Inhaltsanalyse (1)
- Institutional change (1)
- Integrationsstrategie (1)
- Internationale Beziehungen (1)
- Kategorienbildung (1)
- Klassik (1)
- Kommunale Selbstverwaltung (1)
- Kommune (1)
- Kontext (1)
- Koordinierung (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (1)
- Lateinamerika (1)
- Lehrkompetenz (1)
- Leistungsverwaltung (1)
- Markt (1)
- Medien (1)
- Medizintechnik (1)
- Mehrebenensystem (1)
- Migranten (1)
- Narrationen (1)
- Ordnungsverwaltung (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Pluralismus (1)
- Poststrukturalismus (1)
- Präferenzen (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Sachbearbeitung (1)
- Security Council (1)
- Security council (1)
- Security council reform (1)
- Sicherheitspolitik (1)
- Social Choice Theory (1)
- Soziale Gleichheit (1)
- Sozialer Status (1)
- Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (1)
- Umweltperformanz (1)
- Umweltpolitik (1)
- Verflechtung (1)
- Verwaltung (1)
- Verwaltungswissenschaft (1)
- Veto Player (1)
- Vetopunkte (1)
- Vetospieler (1)
- Winning Coalition (1)
- Wirksamkeit von Entwicklungspolitik (1)
- actor constellations (1)
- administration (1)
- administrative reforms (1)
- aid (1)
- climate finance (1)
- comparative public administration (1)
- computerunterstütze Datenanalyse (1)
- coordination (1)
- decentralization (1)
- dependency (1)
- development (1)
- drivers for change (1)
- epistemische Ungerechtigkeit (1)
- formale Modelle (1)
- fragile epistemische Subjekte (1)
- green recovery (1)
- institutional change (1)
- institutional policy (1)
- intergovernmental reforms (1)
- just transition (1)
- legal change (1)
- local and urban governance (1)
- local community (1)
- local finance (1)
- local government systems (1)
- local politics (1)
- lokale Autonomie (1)
- lokale Behörden (1)
- managerial reforms (1)
- meso-level of government (1)
- metamorphosis of international law (1)
- micro-politics (1)
- modernization (1)
- municipalities (1)
- nationale staatliche Kommunikation (1)
- neo weberian state (1)
- new public management (1)
- norm dynamics (1)
- norm robustness (1)
- pathozentrische epistemische Ungerechtigkeit (1)
- politische Urteilsbildung (1)
- post-development (1)
- qualitative Daten (1)
- resilience (1)
- territorial administration (1)
- value change (1)
- Öffentlicher Dienst (1)
- öffentliche Meinung (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (91)
- Sozialwissenschaften (17)
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (13)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (8)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (2)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (1)
- Historisches Institut (1)
- Moses Mendelssohn Zentrum für europäisch-jüdische Studien e. V. (1)
Emmanuel Kant asked three important questions which will always be with us: What can we know? What should we do? What may we hope for? These three key existentialist questions are, of course, also relevant for a reflection on the future of Public Administration: What can we know, as researchers in the field of Public Administration, about our object of public administration? What should we do as researchers and teachers to make sure we remain part of a solution and to guarantee that we are ahead of reality and its future problems? What kind of improvement (or not) may we hope for a public sector in an increasingly complex society? This chapter tries to explore some possible answers to these three important questions for our field of Public Administration. The background is our common project about ‘European Perspectives for Public Administration’ (EPPA), which we hope to establish as a continuous dialogue and discourse in the context of European Public Administration and the ‘European Group for Public Administration’ (EGPA).
Produktivität als Antwort
(2016)
Die international vergleichende Verwaltungswissenschaft (Comparative Public Administration) ist in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten zu einem wichtigen Teilsegment der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft geworden. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird am Beispiel wesentlicher Typologien, Begriffe und Forschungserträge herausgearbeitet, welche Rolle das Vergleichen in der Verwaltungswissenschaft und die öffentliche Verwaltung als Gegenstandsbereich der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft spielen. Es werden zentrale Befunde zur Wirkungsweise und zum Erklärungsbeitrag unterschiedlicher Verwaltungssysteme in vergleichender Perspektive vorgestellt.
Conclusion : Tensions, Challenges, and Future "Flags" of Local Public Sector Reforms and Comparative
(2016)
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is one of the most important multilateral institutions having the ambition to shape global governance and the only organ of the global community that can adopt legally binding resolutions for the maintenance of international peace and security and, if necessary, authorize the use of force. Created in the aftermath of World War II by its victors, the UNSC’s constellation looks increasingly anachronistic, however, in light of the changing global distribution of power. Adapting the institutional structure and decision-making procedures of the UNSC has proven to be one of the most difficult challenges of the last decades, while it is the institution that has probably been faced with the most vociferous calls for reform. Although there have been changes to the informal ways in which outside actors are drawn into the UNSC’s work and activities, many of the major players in the current international system seem to be deprived from equal treatment in its core patterns of decision-making. Countries such as Brazil, Germany, India and Japan, alongside emerging African nations such as Nigeria and South Africa, are among the states eager to secure permanent representation on the Council. By comparison, selected BRICS countries, China and Russia - in contrast to their role in other multilateral institutions - are permanent members of the UNSC and with this, have been “insiders” for a long time. This renders the situation of the UNSC different from global institutions, in which traditionally, Western powers have dominated the agenda.