320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Document Type
- Postprint (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Keywords
- Australian bicameralism (1)
- bicameralism (1)
- coalitions (1)
- consensus (1)
- democracy (1)
- executive-legislative relations (1)
- majority formation (1)
- parliamentary government (1)
- parties (1)
- patterns (1)
- pledge fulfillment (1)
- policy (1)
- presidential government (1)
- veto players (1)
- visions of democracy (1)
Institute
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (2) (remove)
A widespread view in political science is that minority cabinets govern more flexibly and inclusively, more in line with a median-oriented and 'consensual' vision of democracy. Yet there is only little empirical evidence for it. We study legislative coalition-building in the German state of North-Rhine-Westphalia, which was ruled by a minority government between 2010 and 2012. We compare the inclusiveness of legislative coalitions under minority and majority cabinets, based on 1028 laws passed in the 1985–2017 period, and analyze in detail the flexibility of legislative coalition formation under the minority government. Both quantitative analyses are complemented with brief case studies of specific legislation. We find, first, that the minority cabinet did not rule more inclusively. Second, the minority cabinet’s legislative flexibility was fairly limited; to the extent that it existed, it follows a pattern that cannot be explained on the basis of the standard spatial model with policy-seeking parties.
The article analyses the type of bicameralism we find in Australia as
a distinct executive-legislative system – a hybrid between
parliamentary and presidential government – which we call ‘semi-
parliamentary government’. We argue that this hybrid presents an
important and underappreciated alternative to pure parliamentary
government as well as presidential forms of the power-separation,
and that it can achieve a certain balance between competing
models or visions of democracy. We specify theoretically how the
semi-parliamentary separation of powers contributes to the
balancing of democratic visions and propose a conceptual
framework for comparing democratic visions. We use this
framework to locate the Australian Commonwealth, all Australian
states and 22 advanced democratic nation-states on a two-
dimensional empirical map of democratic patterns for the period
from 1995 to 2015.