320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (9) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Postprint (2)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (9) (remove)
Keywords
- Autoritarismus (1)
- Demokratisierung (1)
- Einkommen (1)
- Elite (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Jordanien (1)
- Kapital (1)
- Piketty (1)
- Reichtum (1)
- Ungleichheit (1)
This reference paper describes the sampling and contents of the IZA Evaluation Dataset Survey and outlines its vast potential for research in labor economics. The data have been part of a unique IZA project to connect administrative data from the German Federal Employment Agency with innovative survey data to study the out-mobility of individuals to work. This study makes the survey available to the research community as a Scientific Use File by explaining the development, structure, and access to the data. Furthermore, it also summarizes previous findings with the survey data.
Piketty kontrovers
(2014)
"Berliner Debatte Initial" hat die Veröffentlichung von Thomas Pikettys Bestseller "Das Kapital im 21. Jahrhundert“ zum Anlass genommen, einen breiteren Einblick in die gegenwärtigen wissenschaftlichen Debatten um ökonomische Ungleichheit zu vermitteln. Der Themenschwerpunkt dieses Heftes versammelt Beiträge, die den Anstieg der Ungleichheit aus der Perspektive verschiedener Disziplinen und Denkrichtungen beleuchten. Dabei wird auch die Bedeutung der Bezieher von Spitzeneinkommen (top 1 percent) für die gegenwärtige Gesellschaft diskutiert. Die Auswahl der Texte verdeutlicht die Vielfalt der Aspekte, die die Ungleichheitsproblematik in sich birgt. Dabei wird auch deutlich, dass die Bewertung des Verhältnisses von Staat und Markt sowie die Akzeptanz von ökonomischer Ungleichheit nicht allein aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Theorien und Modellen im engeren Sinne herzuleiten sind, sondern letztlich immer weltanschauliche Axiome sowie Wertorientierungen zur Voraussetzung haben.
Vom Kampf für den Frieden
(2014)
Civil society is either considered as a motor of democratization or stabilizer of authoritarian rule. This dichotomy is partly due to the dominance of domains-based definitions of the concept that reduce civil society to a small range of formally organized, independent and democratically oriented NGOs. Additionally, research often treats civil society as a ‘black box’ without differentiating between potential variations in impact of different types of civil society actors on existing regime structures. In this thesis, I present an alternative conceptualization of civil society based on the interactions of societal actors to arrive at a more inclusive understanding of the term which is more suited for analysis in non-democratic settings. The operationalization of the action-based approach I develop allows for an empirical assessment of a large range of societal activities that can accordingly be categorized from little to very civil society-like depending on their specific modes of interactions within four dimensions. I employ this operationalization in a qualitative case study including different actors in the authoritarian monarchy of Jordan which suggests that Jordanian societal actors mostly exhibit tolerant and democratically oriented modes of interaction and do not reproduce authoritarian patterns. However, even democratically oriented actors do not necessarily take on an oppositional positions vis-à-vis the authoritarian regime. Thus, the Jordanian civil society might not feature a high potential to challenge existing power structures in the country.