320 Politikwissenschaft
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (102) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2021 (102) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (62)
- Part of a Book (20)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (8)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Review (4)
- Other (2)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (102)
Keywords
- institutions (4)
- Coordination (3)
- Germany (3)
- Integration (3)
- Federalism (2)
- Local authorities (2)
- Migration (2)
- debt (2)
- international organizations (2)
- African American literature (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (60)
- Sozialwissenschaften (13)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (12)
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (12)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (4)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (2)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (2)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (2)
- Öffentliches Recht (2)
- Historisches Institut (1)
Zwei mal zwanzig Jahre
(2021)
Obwohl seit der Finanzkrise 2008 systemische Finanzrisiken das Objekt zahlreicher wissenschaftlicher Studien waren, hat die Frage, unter welchen Bedingungen und Umständen die Auferlegung eines systemischen Finanzrisikos moralisch unzulässig ist, bisher kaum Beachtung gefunden. Ziel dieses Aufsatzes ist es, eine Reihe von normativen Kriterien für die Einschätzung der moralischen Unzulässigkeit von systemischen Risiken zu entwickeln. Darüber hinaus wird argumentiert, dass staatliche und andere relevante Institutionen zwei zentrale Pflichten hinsichtlich des Umgangs mit systemischen Finanzrisiken haben: eine Schutzpflicht gegenüber allen Bürger*innen und eine Sorgfaltspflicht, um die diesen Institutionen obliegenden Kontroll- und Aufsichtsfunktionen verantwortungsvoll auszuüben.
Wie weiter?
(2021)
Scholars of international relations and public administration widely assume that international bureaucracies, in their role as policy advisors, directly influence countries' domestic policies. Yet, this is not true across the board. Why do some countries closely consider the advice of international bureaucracies while others do not? This article argues that international bureaucracies' standing as sources of expertise is crucial. We tested this argument using data from a unique survey that measured prevalent practices of advice utilization in thematically specialized policy units of national ministries in a representative sample of more than a hundred countries. Our findings show that ministries' perceptions of international bureaucracies' expertise, that is, specialized and reliable knowledge, are the key factor. International bureaucracies influence national ministries directly and without the support of other actors that may also have an interest in the international bureaucracies' policy advice. Our analysis also demonstrates that the effects of alternative means of influence, such as third-party pressure and coercion, are themselves partly dependent on international bureaucracies' reputation as experts. The findings presented in this article reinforce the emphasis on expertise as a source of international bureaucracies' influence, and provide a crucial test of its importance.
Vorwort
(2021)
In this paper, we have two goals. First, we argue for a blueprint for hermeneutical injustice that allows us to schematize existing and discover new varieties of hermeneutical injustices. The underlying insight is that Fricker provides both a general concept of hermeneutical injustice and a specific conception thereof. By distinguishing between the general concept and its specific conceptions, we gain a fruitful tool to detect such injustices in our everyday lives. Second, we use this blueprint to provide a further example of hermeneutical injustice that draws our attention to yet another distinction: Some hermeneutical injustices result from a lack or distortion in the collective conceptual resource and some are due to problems in the application of existing concepts. We argue that to combat hermeneutical injustices, we have to make sure not only that individuals have accurate concepts at their disposal but that they have the capabilities to use these concepts adequately.