300 Sozialwissenschaften
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (14) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2018 (14) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (6)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Other (3)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (14)
Keywords
- Bourdieu (2)
- discourse (2)
- field (2)
- (Verfahrens-)Gerechtigkeit (1)
- Afroamerikaner (1)
- Denmark (1)
- Doctorow (1)
- Economic sociology (1)
- Economics (1)
- European Union (1)
Institute
- Sozialwissenschaften (14) (remove)
Im (schulischen) Politikunterricht bestehen Vorbehalte bzw. Berührungsängste gegenüber der politischen Theorie, die sich aus drei Vorurteilen speisen: a) Politische Ideen seien abstrakt und wirklichkeitsfern und deshalb schwer in den Horizont der Schülerinnen und Schüler zu rücken; b) die Erarbeitung politischer Ideen sei notwendig textlastig und überfordere aufgrund der hohen Abstraktheit die (Mehrzahl der) Schülerinnen und Schüler; c) aus diesen Gründen seien Motivation und Aktivierung aufseiten der Schülerschaft bei Themen aus der Politischen Theorie gering. Der Aufsatz zeigt am Beispiel eines didaktischen Arrangements zu John Rawls’ Gerechtigkeitstheorie, wie politische Ideen textfrei unterrichtet werden können: im Dreischritt einer Evokation, Explikation und Reflexion der moralisch-politischen Intuitionen, die in unseren Alltagsurteilen immer schon wirksam sind.
This introductory essay to the HSR Special Issue “Economists, Politics, and Society” argues for a strong field-theoretical programme inspired by Pierre Bourdieu to research economic life as an integral part of different social forms. Its main aim is threefold. First, we spell out the very distinct Durkheimian legacy in Bourdieu’s thinking and the way he applies it in researching economic phenomena. Without this background, much of what is actually part of how Bourdieu analysed economic aspects of social life would be overlooked or reduced to mere economic sociology. Second, we sketch the main theoretical concepts and heuristics used to analyse economic life from a field perspective. Third, we focus on practical methodological issues of field-analytical research into economic phenomena. We conclude with a short summary of the basic characteristics of this approach and discuss the main insights provided by the contributions to this special issue.
Struggling over crisis
(2018)
If you put two economists in a room, you get two opinions, unless one of them is Lord Keynes, in which case you get three opinions.” Following the premise of this quotation attributed to Winston Churchill, varying perceptions of the European crisis by academic economists and their structural homology to economists’ positions in the field of economics are examined. The dataset analysed using specific multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) comprises information on the careers of 480 German-speaking economists and on statements they made concerning crisis-related issues. It can be shown that the main structural differences in the composition and amount of scientific and academic capital held by economists as well as their age and degree of transnationalisation are linked to how they see the crisis: as a national sovereign debt crisis, as a European banking crisis, or as a crisis of European integration and institutions.
Dieses Buch hat die Beobachtung zum Ausgangspunkt, dass politische Ideen seit jeher das politische Denken und die politische Praxis bestimmen. Sie sind mit dem Politischen verwoben, sei es offensichtlich, implizit oder kaschiert. Doch wie steht es um das Verhältnis politischer Ideen und politischer Bildung? Als Unterrichtsgegenstände stehen sie in den schulischen Curricula. In den einschlägigen Nachschlagewerken der politischen Bildung finden politische Ideen allenfalls indirekt Beachtung. In den Beiträgen des Sammelbandes wird das Verhältnis politischer Ideen und politischer Bildung in seinen unterschiedlichen Dimensionen reflektiert.
This chapter analyses the creation of novel cross-sectoral and multi-level coordination arrangements inside the German federal bureaucracy during the recent refugee crisis. We argue that the refugee crisis can be considered as an administrative crisis that challenged organisational legitimacy. Various novel coordination actors and arenas were set up in order to enhance governance capacity. Yet, all of them have been selected from a well-known pool of administrative arrangements. As a consequence, those novel coordination arrangements did not replace but rather complement pre-existing patterns of executive coordination. Hence, the recent refugee crisis exemplifies how bureaucracies effectively adapt to changes in their surroundings via limited and temporary adjustments that coexist with existing organisational arrangements. Thus, the observed changes in coordination structures contribute to repairing organisational legitimacy by increasing governance capacity.
Entwicklung eines Instrumentes zur Messung von Präsentismus und Handlungsempfehlungen zur Reduktion
(2018)
In seinem Roman Ragtime (1975) entwirft E. L. Doctorow ein politisches und soziales Sittengemälde der Vereinigten Staaten zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts. Behandelt werden die politischen Herausforderungen der sozialen Ungleichheit, des Rassismus und des amerikanischen Imperialismus. Das in Ragtime entfaltete Panoptikum führt die von politisch-sozialen Gegensätzen geprägte amerikanische Gesellschaft der Ära Theodore Roosevelts vor und ermöglicht zugleich politische Bezüge und Reflexionen bis hin zur Gegenwart. Das Kapitel beleuchtet die realen Ereignisse, die im Roman verwoben sind und reflektiert die sich daraus ergebenden, bis heute aktuellen gesellschaftlichen Probleme sowie unsere politische Gegenwart. Der Autor vermittelt auf diesem Wege die Möglichkeit, mittels Literatur einer breiten Masse von Rezipienten den Zugang zu politischen Sachverhalten zu ermöglichen sowie eine Sensibilität für politisches Geschehen zu wecken.
In the past decade, European countries have contracted out public employment service functions to activate working-age benefit clients. There has been limited discussion of how contracting out shapes the accountability of employment services or is shaped by alternative democratic, administrative, or network forms of accountability. This article examines employment service accountability in Germany, Denmark, and Great Britain. We find that market accountability instruments are additional instruments, not replacements. The findings highlight the importance of administrative and political instruments in legitimizing marketized service provision and shed light on the processes that lead to the development of a hybrid accountability model.
In Europe, different countries developed a rich variety of sub-municipal institutions. Out of the plethora of intra- and sub-municipal decentralization forms (reaching from local outposts of city administration to “quasi-federal” structures), this book focuses on territorial sub-municipal units (SMUs) which combine multipurpose territorial responsibility with democratic legitimacy and can be seen as institutions promoting the articulation and realization of collective choices at a sub-municipal level.
Country chapters follow a common pattern that is facilitating systematic comparisons, while at the same time leaving enough space for national peculiarities and priorities chosen and highlighted by the authors, who also take advantage of the eventually existing empirical surveys and case studies.
Why choice matters
(2018)
Measures of democracy are in high demand. Scientific and public audiences use them to describe political realities and to substantiate causal claims about those realities. This introduction to the thematic issue reviews the history of democracy measurement since the 1950s. It identifies four development phases of the field, which are characterized by three recurrent topics of debate: (1) what is democracy, (2) what is a good measure of democracy, and (3) do our measurements of democracy register real-world developments? As the answers to those questions have been changing over time, the field of democracy measurement has adapted and reached higher levels of theoretical and methodological sophistication. In effect, the challenges facing contemporary social scientists are not only limited to the challenge of constructing a sound index of democracy. Today, they also need a profound understanding of the differences between various measures of democracy and their implications for empirical applications. The introduction outlines how the contributions to this thematic issue help scholars cope with the recurrent issues of conceptualization, measurement, and application, and concludes by identifying avenues for future research.