Institut für Linguistik / Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (78)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (62)
- Postprint (5)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (4)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (78) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (78) (remove)
Keywords
- focus (7)
- prosody (5)
- Focus (4)
- Japanese (4)
- givenness (4)
- information structure (4)
- Optimality Theory (3)
- Prosody (3)
- Topic (3)
- contrastive focus (3)
- Adverbial Quantification (2)
- Information Structure (2)
- Intonation (2)
- Minimalist Program (2)
- Object Shift (2)
- experimental linguistics (2)
- focus ambiguity (2)
- focus asymmetries (2)
- focus intonation (2)
- focus types (2)
- intonation (2)
- morphological focus marking (2)
- scope of focus (2)
- wh-question (2)
- (Statement-Question Matching) (1)
- (implicit) prosody (1)
- A-bar-movement (1)
- Adverbs of Frequency (1)
- Adverbs of Quantity (1)
- Afro-Asiatic (1)
- Agreement (1)
- Alternative Semantics (1)
- Anaphora (1)
- Bias (1)
- Binding Theory (1)
- Candidate Set (1)
- Centering Theory (1)
- Chechen (1)
- Chomskyan linguistics (1)
- Competition (1)
- Complex Speech Acts (1)
- Complexity (1)
- Contrast (1)
- Covert Variables (1)
- Derivation-and-Evaluation model (1)
- Diskursgegebenheit (1)
- Domain Restriction (1)
- Downstep (1)
- Economy (1)
- Evolution of Language (1)
- F-marking (1)
- Foodo (1)
- G-marking (1)
- Givenness (1)
- Handedness (1)
- Information structure (1)
- Intervention Effect (1)
- Klassifikator (1)
- Konkomba (1)
- Kontext (1)
- Koreferenz (1)
- Levels of adequacy (1)
- Movement (1)
- Multiple Spell-Out (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Negative (1)
- OT syntax (1)
- Order preservation (1)
- Parallelism Requirement (1)
- Parameters (1)
- Partition (1)
- Perception (1)
- Pitch Reset (1)
- Polar Questions (1)
- Post-Focus Reduction (1)
- Pronomen (1)
- Pronouns (1)
- Psycholinguistik (1)
- Quantificational Variability (1)
- Recursivity (1)
- Reference Set (1)
- SDRT (1)
- Second Occurrence Focus (1)
- Simplicity (1)
- Situations (1)
- Swiss German (1)
- Syntax (1)
- Tag Questions (1)
- Tense Semantics (1)
- Tone (language) (1)
- Topic/Comment (1)
- Uninterpretablity (1)
- VP-topicalisation (1)
- Vietnamese (1)
- Wh-question (1)
- Whinterrogatives (1)
- Word processing (1)
- adverbial quantification (1)
- affect (1)
- afro-asiatic (1)
- alternative semantics presupposition projection (1)
- anaphora (1)
- applicatives (1)
- argument / adjunct focus (1)
- argument/adjunct focus (1)
- bilingual word processing (1)
- branching (1)
- breadth of focus (1)
- classifier (1)
- cleft (1)
- conjunction (1)
- constraints (1)
- context (1)
- contextual markedness (1)
- contrastive topic (1)
- coreference (1)
- corrective focus (1)
- cyclicity (1)
- dative (1)
- definites (1)
- discourse (1)
- discourse expectability (1)
- discourse structure (1)
- discourse-givenness (1)
- dummy prepositions (1)
- early Germanic (1)
- early indicators for SLI (1)
- economy (1)
- emphasis (1)
- evaluator (1)
- exhaustive identification (1)
- extraposition (1)
- focus anaphoricity (1)
- focus constructions (1)
- focus copula (1)
- focus meaning (1)
- focus movement (1)
- focus type (1)
- foregrounding (1)
- generator (1)
- gesture (1)
- informational focus (1)
- inherent Case (1)
- interface (1)
- intonation (language) (1)
- late talker (1)
- markedness (1)
- mayan (1)
- minimalism (1)
- minimalist program (1)
- narrative structure (1)
- negative polarity item (NPI) (1)
- nepali (1)
- oblique case (1)
- operator movement (1)
- optimality (1)
- optimality theory (1)
- palauan (1)
- phase (1)
- phases (1)
- pitch accent (1)
- polarity focus (1)
- political speech (1)
- predicate focus (1)
- presupposition (1)
- processing (1)
- processing of phonological details (1)
- prosodic phrasing (1)
- prosodic prominence (1)
- psycholinguistics (1)
- reconstruction (1)
- relative clauses (1)
- research programme (1)
- resumption (1)
- second occurrence focus (1)
- situation variables (1)
- split ergative (1)
- spoken discourse (1)
- syntactic focus marking (1)
- syntax (1)
- syntax-phonology interface (1)
- syntax-phonology mapping (1)
- syntax-semantics interface (1)
- tf-idf (1)
- topic (1)
- topic-comment (1)
- topicalization (1)
- universal quantifiers (1)
- variation (1)
- verb-second (1)
- wh-scope (1)
Institute
Singular quantified terms
(2016)
In this paper, I discuss the behavior of singular partitives, focusing on Hebrew. I show that group noun-headed singular quantified terms behave essentially different from other singular quantified terms. Specifically, the domain of quantification in the former is a discrete set (the members of the group), while in the latter the domain of quantification is a set of mass entities. I propose a preliminary analysis of singular quantified terms in Hebrew, respecting the properties peculiar to this language as well as the observations about group vs. non-group singular quantified terms. This analysis is based on a novel class of quantifiers I name ’Measure Quantifiers’, which instantiate relations between algebraic sums. Using shifts between algebraic sums, we can represent the different readings of singular and plural individual or group terms.
This paper investigates an unnoticed difference in Mandarin between the Q-adjectives and the gradable adjectives of quality and shows that this observation follows straightforwardly from a theory that differentiates gradable predication of quantity and that of quality (e.g., Rett 2008; Lin 2014; Solt 2015; a.o.).
Recent work in semantics has shown that languages can vary in whether or not they include degrees (that is, elements of type < d >) in their semantic ontology. Several authors have argued that their languages of study lack degrees, including Bochnak (2013) for Washo (isolate, USA), Pearson (2009) for Fijian (Austronesian, Fiji), and Beck, et al. (2009) for Motu (Austronesian, Papua New Guinea). In this paper, I follow the tests proposed in Beck, et al. (2009) to assess the status of degrees in Warlpiri (Pama-Nyungan, Australia).
I use Warlpiri data collected following the Beck, et al. survey to argue that Warlpiri gradable predicates do not combine with a degree argument. (Like many other Australian languages, adjectival concepts like big and small are expressed using nouns in Warlpiri (Dixon 1982, Bittner & Hale 1995, among others). I refer to these lexical items as “gradable predicates” in this paper.) This paper represents a first pass at assessing the status of degrees in an Australian language, which have otherwise been unexamined from the point of view of degree semantics.
Pronoun resolution normally takes place without conscious effort or awareness, yet the processes behind it are far from straightforward. A large number of cues and constraints have previously been recognised as playing a role in the identification and integration of potential antecedents, yet there is considerable debate over how these operate within the resolution process. The aim of this thesis is to investigate how the parser handles multiple antecedents in order to understand more about how certain information sources play a role during pronoun resolution. I consider how both structural information and information provided by the prior discourse is used during online processing. This is investigated through several eye tracking during reading experiments that are complemented by a number of offline questionnaire experiments. I begin by considering how condition B of the Binding Theory (Chomsky 1981; 1986) has been captured in pronoun processing models; some researchers have claimed that processing is faithful to syntactic constraints from the beginning of the search (e.g. Nicol and Swinney 1989), while others have claimed that potential antecedents which are ruled out on structural grounds nonetheless affect processing, because the parser must also pay attention to a potential antecedent’s features (e.g. Badecker and Straub 2002). My experimental findings demonstrate that the parser is sensitive to the subtle changes in syntactic configuration which either allow or disallow pronoun reference to a local antecedent, and indicate that the parser is normally faithful to condition B at all stages of processing. Secondly, I test the Primitives of Binding hypothesis proposed by Koornneef (2008) based on work by Reuland (2001), which is a modular approach to pronoun resolution in which variable binding (a semantic relationship between pronoun and antecedent) takes place before coreference. I demonstrate that a variable-binding (VB) antecedent is not systematically considered earlier than a coreference (CR) antecedent online. I then go on to explore whether these findings could be attributed to the linear order of the antecedents, and uncover a robust recency preference both online and offline. I consider what role the factor of recency plays in pronoun resolution and how it can be reconciled with the first-mention advantage (Gernsbacher and Hargreaves 1988; Arnold 2001; Arnold et al., 2007). Finally, I investigate how aspects of the prior discourse affect pronoun resolution. Prior discourse status clearly had an effect on pronoun resolution, but an antecedent’s appearance in the previous context was not always facilitative; I propose that this is due to the number of topic switches that a reader must make, leading to a lack of discourse coherence which has a detrimental effect on pronoun resolution. The sensitivity of the parser to structural cues does not entail that cue types can be easily separated into distinct sequential stages, and I therefore propose that the parser is structurally sensitive but not modular. Aspects of pronoun resolution can be captured within a parallel constraints model of pronoun resolution, however, such a model should be sensitive to the activation of potential antecedents based on discourse factors, and structural cues should be strongly weighted.
This thesis gives formal definitions of discourse-givenness, coreference and reference, and reports on experiments with computational models of discourse-givenness of noun phrases for English and German. Definitions are based on Bach's (1987) work on reference, Kibble and van Deemter's (2000) work on coreference, and Kamp and Reyle's Discourse Representation Theory (1993). For the experiments, the following corpora with coreference annotation were used: MUC-7, OntoNotes and ARRAU for Englisch, and TueBa-D/Z for German. As for classification algorithms, they cover J48 decision trees, the rule based learner Ripper, and linear support vector machines. New features are suggested, representing the noun phrase's specificity as well as its context, which lead to a significant improvement of classification quality.
Content: 1 The Typology 1.1 Object Placement 2 Treatment of StG in terms of LF Movement – with and without Head Movement 3 An OT-solution in terms of linearisation (‘LF-to-PF-Mapping’) 3.1 The trigger for additional orders: Focus 3.2 Competitions 3.3 Summary 4 RP 4.1 LF Movement – with and without Head Movement 4.2 The OT-account for RP 4.3 Competitions 5 Summary
Content: 0 Introduction 1 Elements that block verb raising – a discussion 1.1 Haider’s observation 1.2 The other constructions 1.3 A possible explanation 1.4 Riemsdijk’s grafting approach as a possible alternative? 1.5 Intermediate Summary 2 Parsing problems with speech act adverbials in the pre-field
Content: 1 Introduction 2 A restrictive theory of head movement 2.1 Preliminary Remarks 2.2 Theoretical Problems of Head Movement 2.3 Remnant Phrasal Movement 2.4 Münchhausen Style Head Movement 3 Verb Second Movement 3.1 Introductory Remarks 3.2 Problems of V/2 constructions: Does V really move to Comp? 3.3 The preverbal position 3.4 The Second Position 4 References
Counting Markedness
(2003)
This paper reports the results of a corpus investigation on case conflicts in German argument free relative constructions. We investigate how corpus frequencies reflect the relative markedness of free relative and correlative constructions, the relative markedness of different case conflict configurations, and the relative markedness of different conflict resolution strategies. Section 1 introduces the conception of markedness as used in Optimality Theory. Section 2 introduces the facts about German free relative clauses, and section 3 presents the results of the corpus study. By and large, markedness and frequency go hand in hand. However, configurations at the highest end of the markedness scale rarely show up in corpus data, and for the configuration at the lowest end we found an unexpected outcome: the more marked structure is preferred.
The present paper addresses a current view in the psycholinguistic literature that case exhibits processing properties distinct from those of other morphological features such as number (cf. Fodor & Inoue, 2000; Meng & Bader, 2000a/b). In a speeded-acceptability judgement experiment, we show that the low performance previously found for case in contrast to number violations is limited to nominative case, whereas violations involving accusative and dative are judged more accurately. The data thus do not support the proposal that case per se is associated with special properties (in contrast to other features such as number) in reanalysis processes. Rather, there are significant judgement differences between the object cases accusative and dative on the one hand and the subject nominative case on the other. This may be explained by the fact that nominative has a specific status in German (and many other languages) as a default case.
The present paper addresses a current view in the psycholinguistic literature that case exhibits processing properties distinct from those of other morphological features such as number (cf. Fodor & Inoue, 2000; Meng & Bader, 2000a/b). In a speeded-acceptability judgement experiment, we show that the low performance previously found for case in contrast to number violations is limited to nominative case, whereas violations involving accusative and dative are judged more accurately. The data thus do not support the proposal that case per se is associated with special properties (in contrast to other features such as number) in reanalysis processes. Rather, there are significant judgement differences between the object cases accusative and dative on the one hand and the subject nominative case on the other. This may be explained by the fact that nominative has a specific status in German (and many other languages) as a default case.
In the recent literature there is a hypothesis that the human parser uses number and case information in different ways to resolve an initially incorrect case assignment. This paper investigates what role morphological case information plays during the parser’s detection of an ungrammaticality or its recognition that a reanalysis is necessary. First, we compare double nominative with double accusative ungrammaticalities in a word by word, speeded grammaticality task and in this way show that only double nominatives lead to a so-called ”illusion of grammaticality” (a low rate of ungrammaticality detection). This illusion was found to disappear when the second argument was realized by a pronoun rather than by a full definite determiner phrase, i.e. when the saliency of the second argument was increased. Thus, the accuracy in recognizing an ungrammaticality induced by the case feature of the second argument is dependent on the type of this argument. Furthermore, we found that the accuracy in detecting such case ungrammaticalities is distance sensitive insofar as a shorter distance leads to a higher accuracy. The results are taken as support for an ”expectationdriven” parse strategy in which the way the parser uses the information of a current input item depends on the expectation resulting from the parse carried out so far. By contrast, ”input-driven” parse strategies, such as the diagnosis model (Fodor & Inoue, 1999) are unable to explain the data presented here.
Do we know the answer?
(2003)
Holmberg (1997, 1999) assumes that Holmberg's generalisation (HG) is derivational, prohibiting Object Shift (OS) across an intervening non-adverbial element at any point in the derivation. Counterexamples to this hypothesis are given in Fox & Pesetsky (2005) which show that remnant VP-topicalisations are possible in Scandinavian as long as the VP-internal order relations are maintained. Extending the empirical basis concerning remnant VP-topicalisations, we argue that HG and the restrictions on object stranding result from the same, more general condition on order preservation. Considering this condition to be violable and to interact with various constraints on movement in an Optimality-theoretic fashion, we suggest an account for various asymmetries in the interaction between remnant VP-topicalisations and both OS and other movement operations (especially subject raising) as to their order preserving characteristics and stranding abilities.
The main claim of this paper is that the minimalist framework and optimality theory adopt more or less the same architecture of grammar: both assume that a generator defines a set S of potentially well-formed expressions that can be generated on the basis of a given input, and that there is an evaluator that selects the expressions from S that are actually grammatical in a given language L. The paper therefore proposes a model of grammar in which the strengths of the two frameworks are combined: more specifically, it is argued that the computational system of human language CHL from MP creates a set S of potentially well-formed expressions, and that these are subsequently evaluated in an optimality theoretic fashion.
The simple generator
(2006)
I argue that the shift of explanatory burden from the generator to the evaluator in OT syntax – together with the difficulties that arise when we try to formulate a working theory of the interfaces of syntax – leads to a number of assumptions about syntactic structures in OT which are quite different from those typical of minimalist syntax: formal features, as driving forces behind syntactic movement, are useless, and derivational and representational economy are problematic for both empirical and conceptual reasons. The notion of markedness, central in Optimality Theory, is not fully compatible with the idea of synactic economy. Even more so, seemingly obvious cases of blocking by structural economy do not seem to result from grammar proper, but reflect (economical) aspects of language use.
Natural law
(2006)
This work concentrates on the requirements of the computational system of HL, by developing the idea that Natural Law applies to universal syntactic principles. The systems of efficient growth are for the continuation of motion and maximal distance between the elements. The condition of maximization accounts for the properties of syntactic trees - binary branching, labeling, and the EPP. NL justifies the basic principle of organization in Merge: it provides a functional explanation of phase formation and thematic domains. In Optimality Theory, it accounts for the selection of a particular word order in languages. A comprehensive and definitive understanding of the principles underlying MP will eventually lead to a more advanced design of OT.