BioMed Central
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Document Type
- Postprint (3)
Language
- English (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Injury (1)
- Pain occurrence (1)
- Physical fitness (1)
- Resistance training (1)
- Training volume (1)
- Trunk muscle strength (1)
- Young athletes (1)
- performance gains (1)
- plyometric exercise (1)
- post-activation potentiation (1)
Institute
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (3) (remove)
Background:
It has previously been shown that conditioning activities consisting of repetitive hops have the
potential to induce better drop jump (DJ) performance in recreationally active individuals. In the present pilot study,
we investigated whether repetitive conditioning hops can also increase reactive jump and sprint performance in
sprint-trained elite athletes competing at an international level.
Methods:
Jump and sprint performances of 5 athletes were randomly assessed under 2 conditions. The control
condition (CON) comprised 8 DJs and 4 trials of 30-m sprints. The intervention condition (HOP) consisted of 10
maximal repetitive two-legged hops that were conducted 10 s prior to each single DJ and sprint trial. DJ
performance was analyzed using a one-dimensional ground reaction force plate. Step length (SL), contact time (CT),
and sprint time (ST) during the 30-m sprints were recorded using an opto-electronic measurement system.
Results:
Following the conditioning activity, DJ height and external DJ peak power were both significantly
increased by 11 % compared to the control condition. All other variables did not show any significant differences
between HOP and CON.
Conclusions:
In the present pilot study, we were able to demonstrate large improvements in DJ performance even
in sprint-trained elite athletes following a conditioning activity consisting of maximal two-legged repetitive hops.
This strengthens the hypothesis that plyometric conditioning exercises can induce performance enhancements in
elite athletes that are even greater than those observed in recreationally active athletes.. In addition, it appears that
the transfer of these effects to other stretch-shortening cycle activities is limited, as we did not observe any
changes in sprint performance following the plyometric conditioning activity.
Background
Recently, the incidence rate of back pain (BP) in adolescents has been reported at 21%. However, the development of BP in adolescent athletes is unclear. Hence, the purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of BP in young elite athletes in relation to gender and type of sport practiced.
Methods
Subjective BP was assessed in 321 elite adolescent athletes (m/f 57%/43%; 13.2 ± 1.4 years; 163.4 ± 11.4 cm; 52.6 ± 12.6 kg; 5.0 ± 2.6 training yrs; 7.6 ± 5.3 training h/week). Initially, all athletes were free of pain. The main outcome criterion was the incidence of back pain [%] analyzed in terms of pain development from the first measurement day (M1) to the second measurement day (M2) after 2.0 ± 1.0 year. Participants were classified into athletes who developed back pain (BPD) and athletes who did not develop back pain (nBPD). BP (acute or within the last 7 days) was assessed with a 5-step face scale (face 1–2 = no pain; face 3–5 = pain). BPD included all athletes who reported faces 1 and 2 at M1 and faces 3 to 5 at M2. nBPD were all athletes who reported face 1 or 2 at both M1 and M2. Data was analyzed descriptively. Additionally, a Chi2 test was used to analyze gender- and sport-specific differences (p = 0.05).
Results
Thirty-two athletes were categorized as BPD (10%). The gender difference was 5% (m/f: 12%/7%) but did not show statistical significance (p = 0.15). The incidence of BP ranged between 6 and 15% for the different sport categories. Game sports (15%) showed the highest, and explosive strength sports (6%) the lowest incidence. Anthropometrics or training characteristics did not significantly influence BPD (p = 0.14 gender to p = 0.90 sports; r2 = 0.0825).
Conclusions
BP incidence was lower in adolescent athletes compared to young non-athletes and even to the general adult population. Consequently, it can be concluded that high-performance sports do not lead to an additional increase in back pain incidence during early adolescence. Nevertheless, back pain prevention programs should be implemented into daily training routines for sport categories identified as showing high incidence rates.
Background
It has been demonstrated that core strength training is an effective means to enhance trunk muscle strength (TMS) and proxies of physical fitness in youth. Of note, cross-sectional studies revealed that the inclusion of unstable elements in core strengthening exercises produced increases in trunk muscle activity and thus provide potential extra training stimuli for performance enhancement. Thus, utilizing unstable surfaces during core strength training may even produce larger performance gains. However, the effects of core strength training using unstable surfaces are unresolved in youth. This randomized controlled study specifically investigated the effects of core strength training performed on stable surfaces (CSTS) compared to unstable surfaces (CSTU) on physical fitness in school-aged children.
Methods
Twenty-seven (14 girls, 13 boys) healthy subjects (mean age: 14 ± 1 years, age range: 13–15 years) were randomly assigned to a CSTS (n = 13) or a CSTU (n = 14) group. Both training programs lasted 6 weeks (2 sessions/week) and included frontal, dorsal, and lateral core exercises. During CSTU, these exercises were conducted on unstable surfaces (e.g., TOGU© DYNAIR CUSSIONS, THERA-BAND© STABILITY TRAINER).
Results
Significant main effects of Time (pre vs. post) were observed for the TMS tests (8-22%, f = 0.47-0.76), the jumping sideways test (4-5%, f = 1.07), and the Y balance test (2-3%, f = 0.46-0.49). Trends towards significance were found for the standing long jump test (1-3%, f = 0.39) and the stand-and-reach test (0-2%, f = 0.39). We could not detect any significant main effects of Group. Significant Time x Group interactions were detected for the stand-and-reach test in favour of the CSTU group (2%, f = 0.54).
Conclusions
Core strength training resulted in significant increases in proxies of physical fitness in adolescents. However, CSTU as compared to CSTS had only limited additional effects (i.e., stand-and-reach test). Consequently, if the goal of training is to enhance physical fitness, then CSTU has limited advantages over CSTS.