Nicht ermittelbar
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (197)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (197) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (197) (remove)
Keywords
- Integration (3)
- Verwaltung (3)
- Corona (2)
- Digitalisierung (2)
- Gleichstellung (2)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (2)
- Migration (2)
- artificial intelligence (2)
- browser platforms (2)
- platform innovation (2)
- 4IR (1)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Ausländerbehörde (1)
- Auswertung (1)
- Automatisierung (1)
- Bedürfnisse (1)
- Berliner Mauer (1)
- Beruf (1)
- Berufsbilder (1)
- Bundeswehr (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
- CPPS (1)
- Chrome (1)
- Covid-19-Pandemie (1)
- Demokratieförderung (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Dezentralisierung (1)
- Diskurs (1)
- Diskursanalyse (1)
- Diskurstheorie (1)
- Diversität in Schulen (1)
- E-Government (1)
- Egalitarismus (1)
- Emanzipation (1)
- Entscheidungsunterstützung (1)
- Entwicklungstheorien (1)
- Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (1)
- Eurobarometer (1)
- European Green Deal (1)
- European Union (1)
- Existentialismus (1)
- Experience Sampling Method (ESM) (1)
- Firefox (1)
- Flüchtlingskrise (1)
- Freiheit (1)
- Föderalismus (1)
- Führung (1)
- Gemeinden (1)
- Germany (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Grundwerte (1)
- Heterogenisierung von Familienformen;Self-Steering of the Family System (1)
- Homeoffice (1)
- Industrie 4.0 (1)
- Inhaltsanalyse (1)
- Institutionelle Diskriminierung (1)
- Integrationsstrategie (1)
- Internationale Beziehungen (1)
- Kategorienbildung (1)
- Klassik (1)
- Kohäsion (1)
- Kommune (1)
- Kompetenzen (1)
- Kontext (1)
- Koordinierung (1)
- Lehr-Lernsituationen (1)
- Lehrerbildung (1)
- Lehrkompetenz (1)
- Leistungsverwaltung (1)
- Lernaufgaben (1)
- Medien (1)
- Medizintechnik (1)
- Mehrebenensystem (1)
- Migranten (1)
- Modellfabrik (1)
- Narrationen (1)
- National Educational Panel Study (starting cohort 6) (1)
- Neo-Institutionalismus (1)
- Ordnungsverwaltung (1)
- Pluralismus (1)
- Polizei (1)
- Poststrukturalismus (1)
- Präferenzen (1)
- Ramadan (1)
- Recht und Organisation (1)
- SECI-model (1)
- Sachbearbeitung (1)
- Selbstbeobachtung des Familiensystems (1)
- Selbststeuerung des Familiensystems (1)
- Soldatinnen (1)
- Soziale Gleichheit (1)
- Sozialer Status (1)
- Streitkräfte (1)
- Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (1)
- Systemtheorie (1)
- Telearbeit (1)
- Transformation (1)
- Umweltökonomie (1)
- Verflechtung (1)
- Verhaltensökonomie (1)
- Vetopunkte (1)
- Vetospieler (1)
- Weiterbildung (1)
- Wirksamkeit von Entwicklungspolitik (1)
- Zentrum Industrie 4.0 (1)
- actor constellations (1)
- adaptable software systems (1)
- administration (1)
- administrative reform (1)
- administrative reforms (1)
- aid (1)
- augmented reality (1)
- automation (1)
- behavioral economics (1)
- betriebliche Weiterbildung (1)
- better regulation (1)
- bibliometric analysis (1)
- business model (1)
- business process improvement (1)
- business processes (1)
- change (1)
- classroom experiments (1)
- climate finance (1)
- cognitive activation (1)
- complementary market entry (1)
- computerunterstütze Datenanalyse (1)
- context-aware computing (1)
- conversion sequences (1)
- coordination (1)
- cost cutting (1)
- creativity (1)
- cumulative culture (1)
- dependency (1)
- design of knowledge-driven systems (1)
- design science (1)
- development (1)
- digital (1)
- digital platforms (1)
- digital teaching (1)
- digitale Führung (1)
- digitale Lehre (1)
- digitalization (1)
- distributed knowledge base (1)
- diversity management (1)
- doing family (1)
- drivers for change (1)
- economic education (1)
- emotions (1)
- empirical studies (1)
- employment (1)
- environmental economics (1)
- epistemische Ungerechtigkeit (1)
- family firms (1)
- flexible Arbeitsmodelle (1)
- formale Modelle (1)
- fragile epistemische Subjekte (1)
- gender (1)
- gender equality (1)
- green recovery (1)
- heterogenization of family forms (1)
- homeostasis (1)
- human-machine-interaction (1)
- inequality (1)
- innovation (1)
- institutional policy (1)
- institutionalization of evaluation (1)
- instruments (1)
- intentional forgetting (1)
- invention (1)
- invention mechanism (1)
- just transition (1)
- knowledge management (1)
- knowledge transfers (1)
- kognitive Aktivierung (1)
- leadership (1)
- learning (1)
- learning environment (1)
- legal change (1)
- local and urban governance (1)
- local community (1)
- local employer density (1)
- local finance (1)
- local politics (1)
- lokale Autonomie (1)
- lokale Behörden (1)
- lose Kopplung (1)
- managerial reforms (1)
- metamorphosis of international law (1)
- methods (1)
- micro-politics (1)
- modernization (1)
- motivation (1)
- municipalities (1)
- nachhaltige Berufsbildung (1)
- nationale staatliche Kommunikation (1)
- needs (1)
- neuronal systems (1)
- new public management (1)
- norm dynamics (1)
- norm robustness (1)
- online (1)
- open innovation (1)
- parental leave (1)
- patent (1)
- pathozentrische epistemische Ungerechtigkeit (1)
- performance (1)
- physiological needs (1)
- platform coring (1)
- policy implementation (1)
- politische Urteilsbildung (1)
- post-development (1)
- public administration (1)
- qualitative Daten (1)
- regional determinants (1)
- regional network (1)
- remanufacturing (1)
- research agenda (1)
- resilience (1)
- routines (1)
- scenario modeling (1)
- self-observation of the family system (1)
- serious game (1)
- smart automation (1)
- smart production (1)
- software platforms (1)
- strategy (1)
- structural demands of the welfare state (1)
- sustainable vocational education (1)
- symbiotic system design (1)
- systems theory (1)
- tacit knowledge (1)
- tasks (1)
- technology (1)
- territorial reforms (1)
- third-party developer (1)
- tools (1)
- training participation (1)
- training supply (1)
- typology of evaluation (1)
- unlearning (1)
- value change (1)
- virtuelle Führung (1)
- wohlfahrtsstaatliche Strukturvorgaben (1)
- workplace culture (1)
- zero-based budgeting (1)
- Ökonomische Bildung (1)
- öffentliche Meinung (1)
- ökonomische Experimente (1)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (75)
- Öffentliches Recht (33)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (28)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (18)
- Strafrecht (15)
- Bürgerliches Recht (12)
- Sozialwissenschaften (8)
- Lehreinheit für Wirtschafts-Arbeit-Technik (5)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (4)
- Historisches Institut (3)
Appropriation Art
(2020)
Article 15ter Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (Security Council referral)
(2022)
Article 15bis. Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referral, proprio motu)
(2022)
Volle Souveränität?
(2021)
Nach Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 1 des Vertrages zur abschließenden Regelung in Bezug aufDeutschland vom 12. September 1990 (Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag)1beendeten die Fran-zösische Republik, die Union der Sozialistischen Sowjetrepubliken, das VereinigteKönigreich Großbritannien und Nordirland und die Vereinigten Staaten von Ameri-ka„ihre Rechte und Verantwortlichkeiten in Bezug auf Berlin und Deutschland alsGanzes“. Dies hatte, wie in dessen Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 2 ausdrücklich niedergelegt, zurFolge, dass„die entsprechenden, damit zusammenhängenden vierseitigen Verein-barungen, Beschlüsse und Praktiken beendet und alle entsprechenden Einrichtun-gen der vier Mächte aufgelöst“wurden.2Art. 7 Abs. 2 Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag stelltdemgemäß fest, dass das vereinte Deutschland volle Souveränität über seine inne-ren und äußeren Angelegenheiten erhalten habe. Nach dem Wortlaut des Vertrageshaben die Alliierten damit jegliche Rechte in Bezug auf Deutschland abgegeben,rechtliche Auswirkungen der Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch bis in dieheutige Zeit scheinen danach zunächst ausgeschlossen.In dem folgenden Beitrag soll diese aus heutiger Sicht selbstverständlich er-scheinende Hypothese kritisch hinterfragt und der Frage nachgegangen werden, obund inwieweit die Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch immer rechtliche Fol-gen zeitigt. Hierbei soll insbesondere auf Fragen der Fortgeltung alliierten Rechts,Eigentumsfragen sowie auf Fragen der Nachfolge in völkerrechtlichen Verträgeneingegangen werden.
Would the world be a better place if one were to adopt a European approach to state immunity?
(2021)
This chapter argues not only that there is no European Sonderweg (or ‘special way’) when it comes to the law of state immunity but that there ought not to be one. Debates within The Hague Conference on Private International Law in the late 1990s and those leading to the adoption of the 2002 UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States, as well as the development of the EU Brussels Regulation on Jurisdiction and Enforcement, as amended in 2015, all demonstrate that state immunity was not meant to be limited by such treaties but ‘safeguarded’. Likewise, there is no proof that regional European customary law limits state immunity when it comes to ius cogens violations, as Italy and (partly) Greece are the only European states denying state immunity in such cases while the European Court of Human Rights has, time and again, upheld a broad concept of state immunity. It therefore seems unlikely that in the foreseeable future a specific European customary law norm on state immunity will develop, especially given the lack of participation in such practice by those states most concerned by the matter, including Germany. This chapter considers the possible legal implications of the jurisprudence of the Italian Constitutional Court for European military operations (if such operations went beyond peacekeeping). These implications would mainly depend on the question of attribution: if one where to assume that acts undertaken within the framework of military operations led by the EU were to be, at least also, attributable to the troop-contributing member states, the respective troop-contributing state would be entitled to enjoy state immunity exactly to the same degree as in any kind of unilateral military operations. Additionally, some possible perspectives beyond Sentenza 238/2014 are examined, in particular concerning the redress awarded by domestic courts ‘as long as’ neither the German nor the international system grant equivalent protection to the victims of serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during World War II. In the author’s opinion, strengthening the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals, bringing interstate cases for damages before the International Court of Justice, as well as providing for claims commissions where individual compensation might be sought for violations of international humanitarian law would be more useful and appropriate mechanisms than denying state immunity.
§§ 78a GVG
(2023)