Nicht ermittelbar
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (336) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (98)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (77)
- Part of a Book (75)
- Conference Proceeding (43)
- Other (13)
- Doctoral Thesis (8)
- Review (8)
- Working Paper (8)
- Report (5)
- Preprint (1)
Language
- English (336) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (336)
Keywords
- social media (6)
- artificial intelligence (5)
- coordination (4)
- Europe (3)
- big data (3)
- conversational agents (3)
- intergovernmental relations (3)
- knowledge management (3)
- automation (2)
- browser platforms (2)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (64)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (47)
- Institut für Mathematik (46)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (23)
- Öffentliches Recht (19)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (18)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (16)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (12)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (11)
- Department Psychologie (9)
Network approach to supply chain management : terms, scope of issues and lines of development
(2009)
Although mothers and fathers in almost all rich democracies are entitled to some form of paid parenting leave, fathers in particular do not take all the leave available to them. As employers play an important role in the implementation of parenting leave policies, this chapter investigates which workplace characteristics influence mothers' and fathers' uptake of their statutory leave entitlements. In Part 1, we estimate the size of the gap between statutory leave entitlement and leave uptake across genders and countries by combining data from the OECD and the European Labor Force Survey. In Parts 2 and 3, we review the literature on structural, cultural, and normative explanations for the gap in parenting leave uptake. We conclude the chapter with suggestions for further research, including the need for reliable data on the size of the implementation gap and research on non-European countries.
Challenges, triggers and initiators of climate policies and implications for policy formulation
(2020)
This paper starts from the premise that Western states are connected to some of the harms refugees suffer from. It specifically focuses on the harm of acts of misrecognition and its relation to epistemic injustice that refugees suffer from in refugee camps, in detention centers, and during their desperate attempts to find refuge. The paper discusses the relation between hermeneutical injustice and acts of misrecognition, showing that these two phenomena are interconnected and that acts of misrecognition are particularly damaging when (a) they stretch over different contexts, leaving us without or with very few safe spaces, and (b) they dislocate us, leaving us without a community to turn to. The paper then considers the ways in which refugees experience acts of misrecognition and suffer from hermeneutical injustice, using the case of unaccompanied children at the well-known and overcrowded camp Moria in Greece, the case of unsafe detention centers in Libya, and the case of the denial to assistance on the Mediterranean and the resulting pushbacks from international waters to Libya as well as the preventable drowning of refugees in the Mediterranean to illustrate the arguments. Finally, the paper argues for specific duties toward refugees that result from the prior arguments on misrecognition and hermeneutical injustice.