Nicht ermittelbar
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (308) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (100)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (75)
- Part of a Book (65)
- Conference Proceeding (32)
- Other (11)
- Doctoral Thesis (8)
- Review (8)
- Working Paper (6)
- Report (3)
Language
- English (308) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (308)
Keywords
- artificial intelligence (5)
- knowledge management (3)
- social media (3)
- value change (3)
- Europe (2)
- automation (2)
- big data (2)
- browser platforms (2)
- contestation (2)
- conversational agents (2)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (52)
- Institut für Mathematik (46)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (44)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (23)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (18)
- Öffentliches Recht (17)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (16)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (12)
- Department Psychologie (9)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (9)
- Institut für Chemie (9)
- Department Linguistik (8)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (8)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (7)
- Institut für Germanistik (6)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (5)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (4)
- Lehreinheit für Wirtschafts-Arbeit-Technik (4)
- Institut für Romanistik (3)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (2)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (2)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Dynamik komplexer Systeme (2)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (2)
- Sozialwissenschaften (2)
- Bürgerliches Recht (1)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (1)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (1)
- Historisches Institut (1)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (1)
Atwood (2022) analyzes the effects of the 1963 U.S. measles vaccination on longrun labor market outcomes, using a generalized difference-in-differences approach. We reproduce the results of this paper and perform a battery of robustness checks. Overall, we confirm that the measles vaccination had positive labor market effects. While the negative effect on the likelihood of living in poverty and the positive effect on the probability of being employed are very robust across the different specifications, the headline estimate-the effect on earnings-is more sensitive to the exclusion of certain regions and survey years.
From laggards to leaders
(2021)
The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change embraces the participation of non-state actors in a separate governance track – the ‘Non-state actor zone for global action’ (nazca) – that runs alongside the formal track of unfccc negotiations and the implementation of the Paris Agreement by State Parties through ‘nationally determined contributions’. unfccc Secretariat is entrusted with orchestrating non-state global and transnational initiatives, partnerships and networks. The involvement of non-state actors in the implementation of the Paris Agreement helps to address an action gap by countries that are unable or unwilling to implement ambitious ndcs.
However, the increased prominence of initiatives driven by non-state actors also increases their direct and indirect influence on processes and rules which raises a number of questions with regards to the legitimacy of action and the democratic deficit of the global climate regime. Balancing legitimacy with effectiveness requires non-state initiatives to ensure transparent and inclusive governance, and accountability towards progress against their goals and pledges.
Despite its encouragement towards private initiatives, the Paris Agreement creates surprisingly little regulatory space for non-state actors to gain hold. Neither are there measures that would link ndcs to nazca initiatives, nor are functional requirements such as transparency or reporting extended to non-state initiatives. While the Paris Agreement marks an important step towards harnessing private sector ability and ambition for climate action, more remains to be done to create a truly enabling framework for private action to strive and complement public efforts to address climate change.
The politics of fear
(2022)
From victims to activists
(2022)
The EU and its member countries have been laggards in using forest carbon to reduce EU emissions. The European Green Deal aims to change this. As part of its long-term emissions reductions, the EU aims to offset this by creating land-based carbon sinks, especially forest carbon sinks as well as carbon capture and storage. This chapter focuses on the role of forest carbon as part of the EU's climate policies towards achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. It furthermore examines the European Commission's proposed forest strategy and its proposal for a revised LULUCF Regulation. The chapter shows that the logic of appropriateness dominates the European Commission's forest policies. Finally, the chapter makes policy recommendations on how the EU could credibly use long-term carbon sinks to achieve climate neutrality.
Long-term environmental policy remains a vexing puzzle of environmental policy. Following its definition, the author reviews the methods suitable for the study of long-term environmental policy and develops a typology of policy instruments to cope with these challenges. The concluding section offers five central research challenges to advance the study of long-term environmental policy.