Nicht ermittelbar
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (682)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (270)
- Part of a Book (217)
- Review (87)
- Doctoral Thesis (82)
- Conference Proceeding (48)
- Other (31)
- Report (11)
- Working Paper (11)
- Postprint (4)
Keywords
- Digitalisierung (11)
- digitalization (7)
- social media (6)
- Verwaltung (5)
- artificial intelligence (5)
- coordination (5)
- Dialektik (4)
- Industrie 4.0 (4)
- Integration (4)
- Migration (4)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (119)
- Öffentliches Recht (113)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (101)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (80)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (75)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (74)
- Bürgerliches Recht (65)
- Sozialwissenschaften (63)
- Institut für Mathematik (58)
- Institut für Germanistik (54)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (54)
- Department Musik und Kunst (50)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (50)
- Strafrecht (46)
- Historisches Institut (41)
- Institut für Romanistik (41)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (35)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (35)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (34)
- Department Psychologie (33)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (32)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (28)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (24)
- Institut für Slavistik (19)
- Philosophische Fakultät (19)
- Klassische Philologie (17)
- Department Linguistik (16)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (16)
- Department Grundschulpädagogik (13)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (13)
- Lehreinheit für Wirtschafts-Arbeit-Technik (12)
- Arbeitskreis Militär und Gesellschaft in der Frühen Neuzeit e. V. (10)
- Institut für Chemie (10)
- Institut für Künste und Medien (8)
- Institut für Philosophie (5)
- Juristische Fakultät (5)
- Department für Inklusionspädagogik (4)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (2)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (2)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Dynamik komplexer Systeme (2)
- Deutsches MEGA-Konsortialbüro an der Universität Potsdam (1)
- Kommunalwissenschaftliches Institut (1)
- Moses Mendelssohn Zentrum für europäisch-jüdische Studien e. V. (1)
Fälle zum Strafprozessrecht
(2024)
The increasing prevalence and ubiquity of digital technologies is changing the needs and expectations of patients towards healthcare services. As a result, a plethora of patient-centered services edges into the healthcare market. Since digital technologies bear the potential to surmount barriers in time and space, patients increasingly demand real-time or near-time healthcare services. Amongst a cloud of related concepts in the context of digital health, one term increasingly typifies this impulse: on-demand healthcare. While this term can be noticeably found in practice, there is hardly some theoretical foundation so far. Against this background, the aim of this paper is to address this research gap and to explore the phenomenon of on-demand healthcare. Based on a design-science approach including a literature review and analysis of in-depth interviews and empirical cases, the outcome of this paper is twofold: (1) a conceptual framework and (2) a proposal for a definition of on-demand healthcare.
Due to changing customer behavior in digitalization, banks urge to change their traditional value creation in order to improve interaction with customers. New digital technologies such as core banking solutions change organizational structures to provide organizational and individual affordances in IT-supported personal advisory. Based on adaptive structuration theory and with qualitative data from 24 German banks, we identify first, second and third order issues of organizational change in value creation, which are connected with a set of affordances and constraints as the outcomes for customer interaction.
HPI Future SOC Lab
(2024)
The “HPI Future SOC Lab” is a cooperation of the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) and industry partners. Its mission is to enable and promote exchange and interaction between the research community and the industry partners.
The HPI Future SOC Lab provides researchers with free of charge access to a complete infrastructure of state of the art hard and software. This infrastructure includes components, which might be too expensive for an ordinary research environment, such as servers with up to 64 cores and 2 TB main memory. The offerings address researchers particularly from but not limited to the areas of computer science and business information systems. Main areas of research include cloud computing, parallelization, and In-Memory technologies.
This technical report presents results of research projects executed in 2020. Selected projects have presented their results on April 21st and November 10th 2020 at the Future SOC Lab Day events.
Jan Ole Flindt befasst sich mit Fallkonstellationen, in denen ein rechtlich unzutreffender Name tatsächlich geführt oder eine unwirksame Ehe oder ein rechtlich nicht bestehendes Eltern-Kind-Verhältnis wirklich gelebt wird. Im Mittelpunkt der Untersuchung steht die Frage nach Bestand und Reichweite von Vertrauensschutz im deutschen statusorientierten Recht. Statusrecht und Vertrauensschutzgedanke werden zunächst grundlegend beleuchtet, bevor der Autor das einschlägige Fallmaterial systematisch aufbereitet und punktuell bestehende Lösungsansätze des geltenden Rechts zusammenträgt. Letztere reichen von einer statusrechtlichen Heilung über einen (partiellen) schuldrechtlichen Ausgleich bis hin zu einer Versagung jeglichen Vertrauensschutzes. Die Dekonstruktion der Lösungsansätze offenbart statusübergreifende Gemeinsamkeiten, aber auch methodische Schwächen und unbillige Ergebnisse im Einzelfall. Dies nimmt Jan Ole Flindt zum Anlass, einen statusübergreifenden Heilungsansatz im Sinne einer allgemeinen Statusersitzung zur Diskussion zu stellen.
Learning in virtual, immersive environments must be well-designed to foster learning instead of overwhelming and distracting the learner. So far, learning instructions based on cognitive load theory recommend keeping the learning instructions clean and simple to reduce the extraneous cognitive load of the learner to foster learning performance. The advantages of immersive learning, such as multiple options for realistic simulation, movement and feedback, raise questions about the tension between an increase of excitement and flow with highly realistic environments on the one hand and a reduction of cognitive load by developing clean and simple surroundings on the other hand. This study aims to gain insights into learners' cognitive responses during the learning process by continuously assessing cognitive load through eye-tracking. The experiment compares two distinct immersive learning environments and varying methods of content presentation.
Increasingly, research attention is being afforded to various forms of problematic media use. Despite ongoing conceptual, theoretical, and empirical debates, a large number of retrospective self-report scales have been produced to ostensibly measure various classes of such behaviour. These scales are typically based on a variety of theoretical and diagnostic frameworks. Given current conceptual ambiguities, building on previous studies, we evaluated the dimensional structure of 50 scales targeting the assessment of supposedly problematic behaviours in relation to four technologies: Internet, smartphones, video games, and social network sites. We find that two dimensions (‘compulsive use’ and ‘negative outcomes’) account for over 50% of all scale-items analysed. With a median of five dimensions, on average, scales have considered fewer dimensions than various proposed diagnostic criteria and models. No relationships were found between the number of items in a scale and the number of dimensions, or the technology category and the dimensional structure. The findings indicate, firstly, that a majority of scales place an inordinate emphasis on some dimensions over others and, secondly, that despite differences in the items presented, at a dimensional level, there exists a high degree of similarity between scales. These findings highlight shortcomings in existing scales and underscore the need to develop more sophisticated conceptions and empirical tools to understand possible problematic interactions with various digital technologies.
Despite the high hopes associated with public sector digitalization, especially in times of crisis, it does not yet hold up to its potential. Both the negotiation and implementation of digitalization policy presents a challenge for all levels of government, requiring extensive coordination efforts. In general, there are conflicting views if more centralized or decentralized policy processes are more effective for coordination—a tension further exacerbated in the context of digitalization policy within multilevel systems, where the imperative of standardization collides with decentralization forces inherent in federalism.
Based on the analysis of expert interviews (n = 29), this chapter examines how digitalization policy in the context of the German federal intergovernmental relations context is located and negotiated, and how this relates to local policy implementation. Focusing on the decentralized German tax administration as a case study, the analysis reveals a shift from a conflicted to a multi-layered policy process, underpinned by a mechanism of “concentration without centralization.” Strategic and operational competencies are bundled in an institutionalized and legally regulated network for digitalization to achieve necessary standardization of digital infrastructure. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the influence of intergovernmental relations on local implementation and the associated challenges and opportunities.
Urban climate strategies have become central tools for steering climate policy in cities. Local policymakers must coordinate a wide range of actors, among them sub-municipal administrative units and neighbouring administrations, in order to ensure legitimate, socially accepted and effective policy. The study examines, from a comparative perspective, how intergovernmental relations (IGR) play out in the formulation and implementation of climate strategies in the metropolitan areas of Berlin and Paris. Embedded in different institutional contexts, both cities followed a trajectory initiated by relatively centralized strategy formulation with an ongoing shift towards more decentralized and coordinated intergovernmental approaches with their respective district administrations. In terms of horizontal IGR, Berlin took a decoupled approach with limited coordination with the state of Brandenburg, whereas Paris was much more closely integrated with its surrounding areas through the inter-municipal metropolis of Greater Paris. Institutional capacity, multilevel coordination and participation demands are identified as three challenges for the existing IGR structures. Addressing these challenges places significant strains on local administrative capacity. The findings highlight the limitations of centralized approaches to IGR at the local level and the importance of aligning the distribution of functional responsibilities with the rights of consultation and participation in climate policy formulation processes.
Migrant integration is a prime example of intergovernmental coordination and multilevel governance; first because no level of government can carry out this task alone, and second because its cross-cutting nature often leads to fragmented institutional structures that must be overcome. Within the research strand of intergovernmental relations (IGR), the focus has been on executive actors and governmental decision-makers, resulting in an underexposure of the role of public administration, known as inter-administrative relations (IAR). Against this backdrop, we aim to remedy some of the deficits in IGR research by (1) adopting an explicit IAR perspective which systematically addresses the role of local governments; (2) including a comparative dimension in IAR research that accounts for different administrative ‘starting conditions’ in European countries; and (3) using the policy area of migrant integration as a case in point to empirically investigate developments of institutional convergence and divergence in IAR patterns. It is argued that the coordination of migrant integration in the three countries examined has moved towards more intergovernmental coordination, on the one hand, and that the role of municipalities in this context has been enhanced—varying degrees of (de-)centralization notwithstanding. While certain convergent patterns of inter-governmental coordination have become apparent during the migration crisis, historical path dependencies and administrative cultures still appear to be factors that influence institutional development.