Extern
Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (36) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (36) (remove)
Keywords
- COVID-19 (3)
- Bildungswissenschaften (2)
- Forschungsdatenmanagement (2)
- carbon pricing (2)
- educational sciences (2)
- entrepreneurship (2)
- experiment (2)
- gender (2)
- research data management (2)
- self-employment (2)
- Active Labor Market Policy (1)
- Africa (1)
- Backward ownership (1)
- Carbon Capture (1)
- Carbon Dioxide Removal (1)
- Climate Policy (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Datendokumentation (1)
- Datenschutzgrundverordnung (1)
- Difference-in-Differences (1)
- Disziplinspezifisches FDM (1)
- E-DSGE (1)
- Employee Training (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Entry deterrence (1)
- Exportsubvention (1)
- Firm Growth (1)
- Foreclosure (1)
- Forschungsdaten (1)
- General Data Protection Regulation (1)
- High growth firms (1)
- Human Capital Investments (1)
- Impermanence (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Job Creation (1)
- Job Search (1)
- Labor Market Mobility (1)
- Manager Decisions (1)
- Minority shareholdings (1)
- Oligopol (1)
- PHQ-4 score (1)
- Partial ownership (1)
- Personenbezogene Daten (1)
- Policy Reform (1)
- Psychologie (1)
- Push and Pull Theories (1)
- Qualitative Forschungsdaten (1)
- Quality of regional governments (1)
- Regions (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Social Cost of Carbon (1)
- Start-Up Subsidies (1)
- Start-up Motivation (1)
- Survival (1)
- Uniform pricing (1)
- Unintended Consequence (1)
- Vertical integration (1)
- Wohlfahrtseffekt (1)
- air pollution (1)
- ambiguity attitudes (1)
- behavioral economics (1)
- blended learning (1)
- business services (1)
- carbon debt (1)
- carbon emissions (1)
- carbon price (1)
- carbon removal (1)
- cartel (1)
- climate (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate policy (1)
- collusion (1)
- communication (1)
- commuting (1)
- data documentation (1)
- decomposition methods (1)
- developing country cities (1)
- discipline specific rdm (1)
- discrete choice (1)
- discrimination (1)
- disziplinspezifisches FDM (1)
- double dividend (1)
- efficiency (1)
- emergency-aid (1)
- energy expenditure (1)
- energy policy (1)
- entrepreneurship policy (1)
- environmental tax reform (1)
- equity crowdfunding (1)
- finance (1)
- financial access and inclusion (1)
- food prices (1)
- gender pay gap (1)
- goal-setting (1)
- gridded data (1)
- home office (1)
- horizontal equity (1)
- income (1)
- instrumental variables (1)
- just transition (1)
- labor productivity (1)
- labour migration (1)
- leadership (1)
- legal aspects (1)
- linked employer-employee data (1)
- machine learning (1)
- market-entry game (1)
- mental health (1)
- meta-analysis (1)
- migration (1)
- multi-valued treatment (1)
- natural field experiment (1)
- net-negative emissions (1)
- non-Ricardian households (1)
- personal information (1)
- pollution (1)
- population density (1)
- productivity slowdown (1)
- promises (1)
- property taxes (1)
- psychology (1)
- public good (1)
- qualitative research data (1)
- rdm in disciplines (1)
- rechtliche Aspekte (1)
- redistribution (1)
- removal subsidies (1)
- renewable energy subsidies (1)
- representative longitudinal survey data (1)
- representative real-time survey data (1)
- research data (1)
- resilience (1)
- returns to education (1)
- revenue recycling (1)
- risk attitudes (1)
- self-employed (1)
- soft information (1)
- stag-hunt game (1)
- strategic-uncertainty attitudes (1)
- subjective survival probability (1)
- tax competition (1)
- terms-of-trade effects (1)
- trade (1)
- treatment effects (1)
- unilateral climate policy (1)
- vocational education (1)
- voting (1)
Institute
Revisiting public investment
(2004)
The consumption equivalence method is the theoretical basis of public cost-benefit analysis. Consumption equivalence public capital prices are explicitly introduces in order to sufficiently care for the opportunity cost of public expenditure. This can solve the dispute about the social rate of discount within public cost-benefit analysis witch was generated on a criterion looking similar to the capital value formula, known as Lind’s approach. The social rate of discount is liberated from opportunity costs considerations and the discounting away of the effects for future welfare vanishes. The corresponding question whether one should accept a positive value of the pure rate of social time preference is an old issue. Its current state between the prescriptive and descriptive view can also be interpreted as a consequence of the oversimplification of standard cost– benefit analysis. But apart from an economic self-process the pure rate of social time preference is also defined as a business-as-usual value of social distance discounting. Hence, a political choice has to be made about this rate which is free in principal.
An exhaustive and disjoint decomposition of social choice situations is derived in a general set theoretical framework using the new tools of the Lifted Pareto relation on the power set of social states representing a pre-choice comparison of choice option sets. The main result is the classification of social choice situations which include three types of social choice problems. First, we usually observe the common incompleteness of the Pareto relation. Second, a kind of non-compactness problem of a choice set of social states can be generated. Finally, both can be combined. The first problem root can be regarded as natural everyday dilemma of social choice theory whereas the second may probably be much more due to modeling technique implications. The distinction is enabled at a very general set theoretical level. Hence, the derived classification of social choice situations is applicable on almost every relevant economic model.
The COVID-19 pandemic created the largest experiment in working from home. We study how persistent telework may change energy and transport consumption and costs in Germany to assess the distributional and environmental implications when working from home will stick. Based on data from the German Microcensus and available classifications of working-from-home feasibility for different occupations, we calculate the change in energy consumption and travel to work when 15% of employees work full time from home. Our findings suggest that telework translates into an annual increase in heating energy expenditure of 110 euros per worker and a decrease in transport expenditure of 840 euros per worker. All income groups would gain from telework but high-income workers gain twice as much as low-income workers. The value of time saving is between 1.3 and 6 times greater than the savings from reduced travel costs and almost 9 times higher for high-income workers than low-income workers. The direct effects on CO₂ emissions due to reduced car commuting amount to 4.5 millions tons of CO₂, representing around 3 percent of carbon emissions in the transport sector.
This paper sheds new light on the role of communication for cartel formation. Using machine learning to evaluate free-form chat communication among firms in a laboratory experiment, we identify typical communication patterns for both explicit cartel formation and indirect attempts to collude tacitly. We document that firms are less likely to communicate explicitly about price fixing and more likely to use indirect messages when sanctioning institutions are present. This effect of sanctions on communication reinforces the direct cartel-deterring effect of sanctions as collusion is more difficult to reach and sustain without an explicit agreement. Indirect messages have no, or even a negative, effect on prices.
High growth firms (HGFs) are important for job creation and considered to be precursors of economic growth. We investigate how formal institutions, like product- and labor-market regulations, as well as the quality of regional governments that implement these regulations, affect HGF development across European regions. Using data from Eurostat, OECD, WEF, and Gothenburg University, we show that both regulatory stringency and the quality of the regional government influence the regional shares of HGFs. More importantly, we find that the effect of labor- and product-market regulations ultimately depends on the quality of regional governments: in regions with high quality of government, the share of HGFs is neither affected by the level of product market regulation, nor by more or less flexibility in hiring and firing practices. Our findings contribute to the debate on the effects of regulations by showing that regulations are not, per se, “good, bad, and ugly”, rather their impact depends on the efficiency of regional governments. Our paper offers important building blocks to develop tailored policy measures that may influence the development of HGFs in a region.
We investigate how inviting students to set task-based goals affects usage of an online learning platform and course performance. We design and implement a randomized field experiment in a large mandatory economics course with blended learning elements. The low-cost treatment induces students to use the online learning system more often, more intensively, and to begin earlier with exam preparation. Treated students perform better in the course than the control group: they are 18.8% (0.20 SD) more likely to pass the exam and earn 6.7% (0.19 SD) more points on the exam. There is no evidence that treated students spend significantly more time, rather they tend to shift to more productive learning methods. The heterogeneity analysis suggests that higher treatment effects are associated with higher levels of behavioral bias but also with poor early course behavior.