Institut für Informatik und Computational Science
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (154)
- Other (7)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Keywords
- answer set programming (6)
- Answer Set Programming (5)
- Answer set programming (5)
- Theory (2)
- bioinformatics (2)
- Aggregates (1)
- Algorithm configuration (1)
- Algorithm portfolios (1)
- Automated parallelization (1)
- Boolean logic models (1)
- Combinatorial multi-objective optimization (1)
- Complex optimization (1)
- Conformant Planning (1)
- Course timetabling (1)
- Educational timetabling (1)
- Epistemic Logic Programs (1)
- Incremental answer set programming (1)
- Knowledge representation (1)
- Localization (1)
- Logic programming (1)
- Meta-Programming (1)
- Minimal perturbation problems (1)
- Multi-objective optimization (1)
- Non-Monotonic (1)
- Nonmonotonic reasoning (1)
- Parallel SAT solving (1)
- Preference Handling (1)
- Programming by optimization (1)
- Reasoning (1)
- Signaling transduction networks (1)
- Systems biology (1)
- Tracking (1)
- Wireless Sensor Networks (1)
- action and change (1)
- algorithm schedules (1)
- automated guided vehicle routing (1)
- automated planning (1)
- belief merging (1)
- belief revision (1)
- car assembly operations (1)
- consistency (1)
- course timetabling (1)
- declarative problem solving (1)
- diagnosis (1)
- educational timetabling (1)
- finite model computation (1)
- gap-filling (1)
- hybrid solving (1)
- knowledge representation and nonmonotonic reasoning (1)
- linear programming (1)
- metabolic network (1)
- portfolio-based solving (1)
- program encodings (1)
- proof complexity (1)
- strong equivalence (1)
- tableau calculi (1)
- technical notes and rapid communications (1)
Institute
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (163) (remove)
In recent years, there has been a large amount of disparate work concerning the representation and reasoning with qualitative preferential information by means of approaches to nonmonotonic reasoning. Given the variety of underlying systems, assumptions, motivations, and intuitions, it is difficult to compare or relate one approach with another. Here, we present an overview and classification for approaches to dealing with preference. A set of criteria for classifying approaches is given, followed by a set of desiderata that an approach might be expected to satisfy. A comprehensive set of approaches is subsequently given and classified with respect to these sets of underlying principles