Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (9)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
- Postprint (1)
- Preprint (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (23)
Keywords
- E-Learning (3)
- E-learning (2)
- IT-Infrastruktur (2)
- education (2)
- higher education (2)
- policy evaluation (2)
- teacher training (2)
- virtual mobility (2)
- AODV (1)
- Ad hoc routing (1)
Institute
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (23) (remove)
The highly structured nature of the educational sector demands effective policy mechanisms close to the needs of the field. That is why evidence-based policy making, endorsed by the European Commission under Erasmus+ Key Action 3, aims to make an alignment between the domains of policy and practice. Against this background, this article addresses two issues: First, that there is a vertical gap in the translation of higher-level policies to local strategies and regulations. Second, that there is a horizontal gap between educational domains regarding the policy awareness of individual players. This was analyzed in quantitative and qualitative studies with domain experts from the fields of virtual mobility and teacher training. From our findings, we argue that the combination of both gaps puts the academic bridge from secondary to tertiary education at risk, including the associated knowledge proficiency levels. We discuss the role of digitalization in the academic bridge by asking the question: which value does the involved stakeholders expect from educational policies? As a theoretical basis, we rely on the model of value co-creation for and by stakeholders. We describe the used instruments along with the obtained results and proposed benefits. Moreover, we reflect on the methodology applied, and we finally derive recommendations for future academic bridge policies.
The highly structured nature of the educational sector demands effective policy mechanisms close to the needs of the field. That is why evidence-based policy making, endorsed by the European Commission under Erasmus+ Key Action 3, aims to make an alignment between the domains of policy and practice. Against this background, this article addresses two issues: First, that there is a vertical gap in the translation of higher-level policies to local strategies and regulations. Second, that there is a horizontal gap between educational domains regarding the policy awareness of individual players. This was analyzed in quantitative and qualitative studies with domain experts from the fields of virtual mobility and teacher training. From our findings, we argue that the combination of both gaps puts the academic bridge from secondary to tertiary education at risk, including the associated knowledge proficiency levels. We discuss the role of digitalization in the academic bridge by asking the question: which value does the involved stakeholders expect from educational policies? As a theoretical basis, we rely on the model of value co-creation for and by stakeholders. We describe the used instruments along with the obtained results and proposed benefits. Moreover, we reflect on the methodology applied, and we finally derive recommendations for future academic bridge policies.
KEYCIT 2014
(2015)
In our rapidly changing world it is increasingly important not only to be an expert in a chosen field of study but also to be able to respond to developments, master new approaches to solving problems, and fulfil changing requirements in the modern world and in the job market. In response to these needs key competencies in understanding, developing and using new digital technologies are being brought into focus in school and university programmes. The IFIP TC3 conference "KEYCIT – Key Competences in Informatics and ICT (KEYCIT 2014)" was held at the University of Potsdam in Germany from July 1st to 4th, 2014 and addressed the combination of key competencies, Informatics and ICT in detail. The conference was organized into strands focusing on secondary education, university education and teacher education (organized by IFIP WGs 3.1 and 3.3) and provided a forum to present and to discuss research, case studies, positions, and national perspectives in this field.
The educational sector currently faces a massive digital transformation with various digital offerings entering the market. To provide some orientation in this transforming space, a national digital education platform (NDEP) is under development in Germany as part of a nationwide flagship project. On the one hand, in efficiently connecting the relevant stakeholders to each other and to value-adding education-related offerings, various benefits emerge. On the other hand, monopolising the educational sector and influencing the respective market through a state-controlled platform bears potential regulatory risks from misuse of power by the platform to malpractice by the users. Against this background, we aim to identify and systematise these potential drawbacks prior to the platform’s actual development and implementation. We pursue a qualitative, interpretivist approach for policy analysis, based on ten elite interviews and two workshops. Our results are threefold: (1) We capture the consolidated NDEP architecture; (2) We categorise the range of relevant functions and value propositions of the NDEP; (3) We derive 23 regulatory areas of conflict across the three building blocks that result from the potential ecosystem and function scope configurations of the NDEP. As a contribution to research, we shed new interdisciplinary light on the governance and infrastructure of public-private platforms that enable innovation and collaboration while integrating respective market segments. As a contribution to practice, we provide clear guidance for policy-makers in strategizing the development and governance of and through national digital platforms in education.
Mit der Covid-19-Pandemie hat die Digitalisierung an Hochschulen weitere Bedeutung erlangt. Insbesondere dem Einsatz digitaler Medien in Lehre und Studium galt großes Augenmerk. Das legt die Hoffnung nahe, dass die Digitalisierung durch das Virus einen Schub erfahren und die Hochschulen dauerhaft verändert hat. Der Beitrag geht am Beispiel der Universität Potsdam der Frage nach, welcher Natur diese Veränderungen waren – ausgehend sowohl von den unternommenen Maßnahmen als auch von den erzielten Resultaten – und inwiefern sie von Dauer sind. Dabei werden förderliche und hemmende Faktoren identifiziert, die in Empfehlungen für weitere Digitalisierungsvorhaben übersetzt werden.
Deutsche Universitäten erweitern ihre E-Learning-Angebote als Service für die Studierenden und Lehrenden. Diese sind je nach Fakultät unterschiedlich ausgeprägt. Dieser Artikel zeigt, wie durch technische Erweiterung der Infrastruktur, einer Anpassung der Organisationsstruktur und einer gezielten Inhaltsentwicklung eine durchgängige und personalisierbare Lehr- und Lernumgebung (Personal Learning Environment, PLE) geschaffen und damit die Akzeptanz bei den Lehrenden und Studierenden für E-Learning erhöht werden kann. Aus der vorausgehenden, systematischen Anforderungsanalyse können Kennzahlen für die Qualitätssicherung von E-Learning-Angeboten abgeleitet werden.
Mobile devices and associated applications (apps) are an indispensable part of daily life and provide access to important information anytime and anywhere. However, the availability of university-wide services in the mobile sector is still poor. If they exist they usually result from individual activities of students and teachers. Mobile applications can have an essential impact on the improvement of students’ self-organization as well as on the design and enhancement of specific learning scenarios, though. This article introduces a mobile campus app framework, which integrates central campus services and decentralized learning applications. An analysis of strengths and weaknesses of different approaches is presented to summarize and evaluate them in terms of requirements, development, maintenance and operation. The article discusses the underlying service-oriented architecture that allows transferring the campus app to other universities or institutions at reasonable cost. It concludes with a presentation of the results as well as ongoing discussions and future work
In universities, diverse tools and software systems exist that each facilitates a different teaching and learning scenario. A deviating approach is taken by Personal Learning Environments (PLE) that aim to provide a common platform. Considering e-portfolios as an integral part of PLEs, especially portfolio-based learning and assessment have to be supported. Therefore, the concept of a PLE is developed further by enabling the products of different software systems to be integrated in portfolio pages and finally submitted for feedback and assessment. It is further elaborated how the PLE approach is used to support the continuous formative assessment within portfolio-based learning scenarios.
Mobile Endgeräte und die dazugehörigen Applikationen sind zu einem unverzichtbaren Bestandteil des täglichen Lebens geworden und ermöglichen den ortsund zeitunabhängigen Zugriff auf wichtige Informationen. Hochschulspezifische An- gebote sind im mobilen Bereich hingegen noch immer nicht flächendeckend anzutreffen und lassen sich i. d. R. nur auf Einzelaktivitäten Studierender und Lehrender zurückführen. Dabei können mobile Applikationen einen essentiellen Beitrag zur Verbesserung der studentischen Selbstorganisation sowie für die Ausgestaltung und Ergänzung von konkreten Lehr-/Lernszenarien leisten. Dieser Artikel stellt ein modulares Hochschul-App-Framework vor, das sowohl zentrale campusbezogene Dienste als auch dezentrale Lernapplikationen unter einer Oberfläche vereint anbietet. Anhand einer Analyse von Stärken und Schwächen werden verschiedene Ansätze in Hinblick auf Anforderungen, Entwicklung, Wartung und Betrieb der Hochschul-App zusammengefasst und bewertet. Es wird auf die zugrundeliegende serviceorientierte Architektur eingegangen, die eine Portierung der Applikation auf andere Hochschulen mit einem vertretbaren Aufwand ermöglicht. Der Beitrag schließt mit einer Darstellung der ersten Ergebnisse und weiterführender Überlegungen und Arbeiten.
The ongoing digitalization leads to a need of continuous change of ICT (Information and Communi-cation Technology) in all university domains and therefore affects all stakeholders in this arena. More and more ICT components, systems and tools occur and have to be integrated into the existing processes and infrastructure of the institutions. These tasks include the transfer of resources and information across multiple ICT systems. By using so-called virtual environments for domains of re-search, education, learning and work, the performance of daily tasks can be aided. Based on a user requirement analysis different short- and long-term objectives were identified and are tackled now in the context of a federal research project. In order to be prepared for the ongoing digitalization, new systems have to be provided. Both, a service-oriented infrastructure and a related web-based virtual learning environment constitute the platform Campus.UP and creates the necessary basis to be ready for future challenges. The current focus lies on e-portfolio work, hence we will present a related focus group evaluation. The results indicate a tremendous need to extend the possibilities of sharing resources across system boundaries, in order to enable a comfortable participation of exter-nal cooperating parties and to clarify the focus of each connected system. The introduction of such an infrastructure implies far-reaching changes for traditional data centers. Therefore, the challenges and risks of faculty conducting innovation projects for the ICT organization are taken as a starting point to stimulate a discussion, how data centers can utilize projects to be ready for the future needs. We are confident that Campus.UP will provide the basis for ensuring the persistent transfer of innovation to the ICT organization and thus will contribute to tackle the future challenges of digitalization.