Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (233)
- Part of a Book (51)
- Review (31)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (11)
- Part of Periodical (4)
- Postprint (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
Keywords
- evidentiality (4)
- Geschichte (3)
- modal verbs (3)
- modality (3)
- pragmaticalisation (3)
- Adverbs (2)
- Kongress (2)
- Linguistik (2)
- function (2)
- functional unit (2)
Die Markierung der Herkunft des Sprecherwissens : ein grammatisches und pragmatisches Problem
(1998)
Laudation zur Verleihung des Doktogrades ehrenhalber an Herrn Prof. em. Dr. phil. Helmut Lüdke
(2008)
Prefacio
(2008)
The term "analysis" came into use in Spanish school grammars during the first half of the nineteenth century. Following a process of simplification still evident today, the teaching of this concept in Spain distinguished between logical analysis and grammatical analysis, i.e. the separation or the division of sentences into clauses and of clauses into their immediate constituents and, on the other hand, the study of the parts of speech. A close perusal of various grammars, however, reveals that analysis is a concept used with different meanings, which minimises the distinction between logic and grammar. The term "analysis" includes elements of scholastic grammar and also aspects of the general grammar of the Port Royal School, which was introduced in Spain rather late, as well as ideological features associated with the impact of French ideas in Spain in the early nineteenth century. This paper shall explore the different concepts of "analysis" in Elementos de gramática c astellana by Juan Manuel Calleja, Análisis lógica y gramatical de la lengua espanola by Juan Calderón and Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos by Andrés Bello.
In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality.
It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe & Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale & Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.
La linéarité du langage comme problème théoretique dans les théories rationalistes et sensualistes
(2012)
Identität durch Sprache : der Diskurs zur Apologie der Vernakularsprachen bis zum 18. Jahrhundert
(2011)
Einleitung
(2008)
Acknowlegements
(2011)