Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (7)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Postprint (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (14)
Keywords
- public administration (2)
- Administrative federalism (1)
- Bürokratisierung (1)
- Civil service career (1)
- Drogen (1)
- Drogenkonsum (1)
- Drugteam (1)
- Empirische Studie (1)
- European Union (EU) (1)
- Federal Constitutional Court (1)
This chapter addresses the role of evaluation of and in public administration. We focus on two analytical key dimensions: a) the provider of the evaluation and b) the subject of the evaluation. Four major types of evaluation are distinguished: (1) external institutional evaluation, (2) internal institutional evaluation, (3) external evaluation of administrative action/results, (4) internal evaluation of administrative action/results. Type 1 and 2 refer to evaluation of administrative structures and processes as the subject of administrative reform. Type 3 and 4 represent different versions of evaluation in public administration, because the subject is administrative action and its outputs. The chapter highlights salient approaches and organizational settings of evaluation and provides insights into the institutionalization of an evaluation function in public administration. Finally, the chapter draws lessons regarding strengths and potentials but also remaining weaknesses and challenges of evaluation of and in public administration.
Switches between political and administrative positions seem to be quite common in today’s politics, or at least not so unusual any longer. Nevertheless, up-to-date empirical studies on this issue are lacking. This paper investigates the presumption, that in recent years top bureaucrats have become more politicised, while at the same time more politicians stem from a bureaucratic background, by looking at the career paths of both. For this purpose, we present new empirical evidence on career patterns of top bureaucrats and executive politicians both at Federal and at Länder level. The data was collected from authorized biographies published at the websites of the Federal and Länder ministries for all Ministers, Parliamentary State Secretaries and Administrative State Secretaries who held office in June 2009.
Although German bureaucracy is typically categorised as Weberian, a clear distinction between politics and administration has never been a defining characteristic of the German political-administrative system. Many close interrelations and interactions between elected politicians and appointed civil servants can be observed at all levels of administration. Higher-ranking civil servants in Germany are used to and generally appreciate the functional politicisation of their jobs, that is their close involvement in all stages of the policy process, from policy formation, goal definition, negotiation within and outside government to the implementation and evaluation of policies. For top positions, therefore, a class of ‘political civil servants’ is a special feature of the German system, and obtaining ‘political craft’ has become an important part of the learning and job experience of higher-ranking civil servants.
This open access book presents a topical, comprehensive and differentiated analysis of Germany’s public administration and reforms. It provides an overview on key elements of German public administration at the federal, Länder and local levels of government as well as on current reform activities of the public sector. It examines the key institutional features of German public administration; the changing relationships between public administration, society and the private sector; the administrative reforms at different levels of the federal system and numerous sectors; and new challenges and modernization approaches like digitalization, Open Government and Better Regulation. Each chapter offers a combination of descriptive information and problem-oriented analysis, presenting key topical issues in Germany which are relevant to an international readership.
Die 'Repräsentativstudie zum Drogenkonsum Potsdamer Jugendlicher 2002' ist eine Querschnittsstudie. Es wurden Art und Umfang des Drogenkonsums der Jugendlichen im Alter von 14 bis 18 Jahren, die in der Stadt Potsdam zur Zeit der Befragung wohnhaft waren, untersucht, im besonderem die Lifetime-Prävalenz, das Erstkonsumalter, 12-Monatsprävalenz, Konsumort, sozialer Kontext, Probierbereitschaft, Informationsquellen, Konsumwirkung sowie Probleme mit dem Drogenkonsum etc. Insgesamt kamen 953 Fragebögen zur Auswertung. Die enthaltenen Interpretationen dienen der Stadt Potsdam für langfristige Maßnahmen, die Drogenhilfe zu planen und durchzuführen.