Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (12) (remove)
Language
- English (12)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (12)
Keywords
- Alcohol dependence (2)
- alcohol (2)
- reinforcement learning (2)
- Alcohol expectancy (1)
- Computer-assisted Alcohol Infusion System (1)
- Goal-directed control (1)
- Human neuroimaging (1)
- Medial prefrontal cortex (1)
- Nucleus accumbens (1)
- Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (1)
- Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (1)
- Pavlovian‐to‐instrumental transfer (1)
- Reinforcement learning (1)
- Relapse (1)
- Treatment outcome (1)
- amygdala (1)
- chronic stress (1)
- cognitive speed (1)
- computational modeling (1)
- decision making (1)
- decision-making (1)
- drinking problems (1)
- goal-directed (1)
- habitual learning (1)
- high risk drinkers (1)
- high‐risk drinking (1)
- human Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (1)
- immigrant (1)
- interference control (1)
- model-based learning (1)
- model-free and model-based decision-making (1)
- model-free learning (1)
- nucleus accumbens (1)
- polygenic risk (1)
- real-life drinking behaviour (1)
- real-life events (1)
- relapse in alcohol use disorder (1)
- social behavior; (1)
- subjective response to ethanol (1)
- subtle and blatant prejudice (1)
- two-stage Markov decision task (1)
Institute
In detoxified alcohol-dependent patients, alcohol-related stimuli can promote relapse. However, to date, the mechanisms by which contextual stimuli promote relapse have not been elucidated in detail. One hypothesis is that such contextual stimuli directly stimulate the motivation to drink via associated brain regions like the ventral striatum and thus promote alcohol seeking, intake and relapse. Pavlovian-to-Instrumental-Transfer (PIT) may be one of those behavioral phenomena contributing to relapse, capturing how Pavlovian conditioned (contextual) cues determine instrumental behavior (e.g. alcohol seeking and intake). We used a PIT paradigm during functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the effects of classically conditioned Pavlovian stimuli on instrumental choices in n=31 detoxified patients diagnosed with alcohol dependence and n=24 healthy controls matched for age and gender. Patients were followed up over a period of 3 months. We observed that (1) there was a significant behavioral PIT effect for all participants, which was significantly more pronounced in alcohol-dependent patients; (2) PIT was significantly associated with blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in subsequent relapsers only; and (3) PIT-related NAcc activation was associated with, and predictive of, critical outcomes (amount of alcohol intake and relapse during a 3 months follow-up period) in alcohol-dependent patients. These observations show for the first time that PIT-related BOLD signals, as a measure of the influence of Pavlovian cues on instrumental behavior, predict alcohol intake and relapse in alcohol dependence.
Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) tasks examine the influence of Pavlovian stimuli on ongoing instrumental behaviour. Previous studies reported associations between a strong PIT effect, high-risk drinking and alcohol use disorder. This study investigated whether susceptibility to interference between Pavlovian and instrumental control is linked to risky alcohol use in a community sample of 18-year-old male adults. Participants (N = 191) were instructed to 'collect good shells' and 'leave bad shells' during the presentation of appetitive (monetary reward), aversive (monetary loss) or neutral Pavlovian stimuli. We compared instrumental error rates (ER) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain responses between the congruent and incongruent conditions, as well as among high-risk and low-risk drinking groups. On average, individuals showed a substantial PIT effect, that is, increased ER when Pavlovian cues and instrumental stimuli were in conflict compared with congruent trials. Neural PIT correlates were found in the ventral striatum and the dorsomedial and lateral prefrontal cortices (lPFC). Importantly, high-risk drinking was associated with a stronger behavioural PIT effect, a decreased lPFC response and an increased neural response in the ventral striatum on the trend level. Moreover, high-risk drinkers showed weaker connectivity from the ventral striatum to the lPFC during incongruent trials. Our study links interference during PIT to drinking behaviour in healthy, young adults. High-risk drinkers showed higher susceptibility to Pavlovian cues, especially when they conflicted with instrumental behaviour, indicating lower interference control abilities. Increased activity in the ventral striatum (bottom-up), decreased lPFC response (top-down), and their altered interplay may contribute to poor interference control in the high-risk drinkers.