Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (2) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2014 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Keywords
Institute
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (2) (remove)
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Patienten mit koronarer Herzkrankheit verfugen uber eine altersentsprechend reduzierte korperliche Leistungsfahigkeit. Um in Abhangigkeit bestehender Patientencharakteristika ein zielgruppenspezifisches Training wahrend kardiologischer Rehabilitation zu ermoglichen, ist die Kenntnis von Einflussgro ss en auf die Steigerung der Leistungsfahigkeit wunschenswert.
Methodik: In einem bundesweiten Register (TROL) wurden 47286 Patienten (mittleres Alter: 6411,62 Jahre; 74,5% Manner) eingeschlossen. Alle Patienten absolvierten zu Beginn und zum Ende der Rehabilitation einen fahrradergometrischen Belastungstest. Als abhangige Variable fur die univariate Analyse und die multivariate logistische Regression galt die Steigerung der Belastbarkeit, die uber einen Cut-off-Wert von 15 Watt Leistungszuwachs definiert wurde. Als Einflussfaktoren gingen Komorbiditaten und eine vor dem Index-Ereignis bestehende korperliche Aktivitat von>90Min/Woche in die Analyse ein.
Ergebnisse: Die Leistungssteigerung aktiver im Vergleich zu inaktiven Patienten war signifikant hoher (21,84 Watt vs. 16,35 Watt; p<0,001). Korperliche Aktivitat vor dem Ereignis (Odds Ratio - OR 1,85 [95% Konfidenzintervall - CI: 1,75-1,97]) sowie mannliches Geschlecht (OR 1,62 [95% CI: 1,51-1,74]) konnten als positive, Komorbiditaten und Alter (OR 0,82 [95% CI: 0,74-0,90]) als negative Pradiktoren identifiziert werden.
Schlussfolgerung: Zukunftig sollten in kardiologischen Rehabilitationseinrichtungen zielgruppenspezifische Trainingsprogramme eingesetzt werden, die die eingeschrankte Leistungsfahigkeit alterer und durch Komorbiditat limitierter Patienten berucksichtigt.
Abstract
Objective Patients who suffered from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) boast a low exercise capacity (EC). To enhance EC is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The aim of the study was to investigate predictors of exercise capacity to optimize the rehabilitation process in untrained subgroups.
Method: 47286 patients (mean age 6411.62, 74.5% male) were enclosed in the TROL registry. All patients underwent a bicycle stress test at admission and discharge. The dependent variable for the univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was the increase of EC during CR, with a cutoff of 15 Watts (pre/post design). Furthermore comorbidities and physical activity before the index event were analyzed.
Results: Exercise capacity enhancement differs between active and inactive patients significantly (21.84 Watt vs. 16.35 Watt; p<0.001). While a male gender (OR 1.62 [95% CI: 1.51-1.74]) and physical activity before rehabilitation (OR 1.85 [95% CI: 1.75-1.97]) were positive, comorbidities and age (OR 0.82 [95% CI: 0.74-0.90]) were negative predictors.
Conclusion: In cardiac rehabilitation settings special exercise training programs for elderly and comorbid patients are needed, to enhance their exercise capacity sufficiently.
BackgroundCurrent data on the management of patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after an acute hospital stay due to ST-segment elevation or non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS) are limited. We aimed to describe patient characteristics, risk factor management, and lipid target achievement of patients in CR in Germany and compare the 2 groups.
HypothesisWith respect to the risk factor pattern and treatment effects during a CR stay, there are important differences between STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS patients.
MethodsComparison of 7950 patients by STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS status in the Transparency Registry to Objectify Guideline-Oriented Risk Factor Management registry (2010) who underwent an inpatient CR period of about 3 weeks.
ResultsSTE-ACS patients compared to NSTE-ACS patients were significantly younger (60.5 vs 64.4 years, P < 0.0001), and had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or any risk factor (exception: smoking) less often. At discharge, in STE-ACS compared to NSTE-ACS patients, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL goal was achieved by 75.3% and 76.2%, respectively (LDL-C <70 mg/dL by 27.7% and 27.4%), the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal of >50 mg/dL in women and >40 mg/dL in men was achieved by 49.3% and 49.0%, respectively, and the triglycerides goal of <150 mg/dl was achievedby 72.3% and 74.3%, respectively (all comparisons not significant). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 121/74 and 123/74 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.0001 systolic, diastolic not significant). The maximum exercise capacity was 110 and 102 W, respectively (P < 0.0001), and the maximum walking distance was 581 and 451 meters, respectively (P value not significant).
ConclusionsPatients with STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS differed moderately in their baseline characteristics. Both groups benefited from the participation in CR, as their lipid profile, blood pressure, and physical fitness improved.