Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (55)
- Postprint (7)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Review (1)
Keywords
- GPS (7)
- Lepus europaeus (5)
- European hare (4)
- fence ecology (4)
- ungulate (4)
- veterinary cordon fence (4)
- Acacia mellifera (3)
- Movement ecology (3)
- ODBA (3)
- animal movement (3)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (60)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (7)
- Extern (5)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Musterdynamik und Angewandte Fernerkundung (3)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (1)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (1)
- Referat für Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (1)
Corona. Schon mal gehört? Noch Weihnachten 2019 hätten viele ahnungslos geantwortet: „Nö.“ Besser Informierte hätten zurückgefragt: „Meinst du die Korona – den Hof um die Sonne?“ Und ganz Schlaue hätten gesagt: „Klar, trink ich gern.“ Doch spätestens seit Februar beherrscht das Virus die Nachrichten, seit März auch unser Leben. Nach und nach mussten wir alle lernen, uns (wieder) richtig die Hände zu waschen und die „Niesetikette“ zu befolgen, Abstand zu halten, zu Hause zu arbeiten oder zu lernen, Masken zu tragen oder gar zu nähen – und überhaupt: uns mit dem Ausnahmezustand, der zum Dauerzustand zu werden droht, zu arrangieren. Aber wie macht das eine ganze Universität – mit 21.000 Studierenden, mehr als 4.500 Beschäftigten, Tausenden Kursen, Praktika, Prüfungen und Forschungsprojekten? Wie hält man einen Tanker an – in voller Fahrt – und rüstet ihn um für einen pandemiesicheren Betrieb? Die zurückliegenden Wochen haben gezeigt: Es geht. Inzwischen läuft mit dem Sommersemester 2020 das erste Online-Semester der Hochschulgeschichte. Auch das hätte Ende 2019 niemand für möglich gehalten, schon gar nicht so bald.
Das Referat für Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit musste wie alle Unibereiche lernen, mit den ungewöhnlichen Umständen umzugehen, die mal bedrohlich, mal lästig, mal ermüdend und mal eben einfach nur umständlich wirkten. Wir haben uns bemüht, so gut es ging, zu informieren – darüber was sich tat, was getan werden musste und konnte. Und was kommt. Doch wir wollten noch mehr wissen: Was sagen die Potsdamer Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler zur Corona- Pandemie, ihren Auswirkungen und Folgen, aber auch dazu, was sich dagegen tun lässt? Wie genau funktioniert eine Universität unter den besonderen Umständen? Wie wird gearbeitet, studiert, geforscht? Wie verlagert man ein ganzes Semester in den Online-Betrieb? Auf der Suche nach Antworten auf diese und viele weitere Fragen ist eine Vielzahl von Texten entstanden, die wir nach und nach auf der Webseite der UP veröffentlicht haben als „Beiträge aus der Universität Potsdam zur Corona-Pandemie“.* Eine gekürzte Auswahl dieser Texte haben wir für diese „Portal Spezial“ zusammengestellt. Nicht, weil wir über nichts anderes als den Corona-Virus mehr reden wollen, sondern weil wir dokumentieren wollen, dass die Universität Potsdam durch die Pandemie keineswegs in einen Dornröschenschlaf versetzt wurde. Vielmehr entstanden durch das Engagement vieler Forschender, Studierender und Beschäftigter zahlreiche Initiativen, Ideen, Projekte, Strukturen und Neuerungen, die zeigen: Die Universität Potsdam lässt sich nicht unterkriegen! Deshalb hoffen wir, dass die Lektüre des Heftes Ihnen trotz der weiterhin herausfordernden Umstände Freude und Mut macht. (Die Texte entstanden alle im März/April 2020, als viele Entwicklungen noch am Anfang standen und ihr Verlauf nicht absehbar war. Wir haben sie dennoch unverändert aufgenommen, um diese Phase und die Reaktion der Wissenschaft darauf zu dokumentieren.)
Although the effects of grazing-induced savannah degradation on animal diversity are well documented, knowledge of how they affect space use or responding behaviour remains poor. In this study, we analysed space use of the spotted sand lizard (Pedioplanis l. lineoocellata) in degraded versus nondegraded habitats of southern Kalahari savannah habitats. Lizards were radio tracked, daily movement distances recorded and home range sizes calculated. In degraded Kalahari savannah habitats where plant diversity and perennial grass cover are low but shrub cover high, P. lineoocellata moves larger distances (40.88 +/- 6.42 m versus 27.43 +/- 5.08 m) and occupies larger home ranges (646.64 +/- 244.84 m(2) versus 209.15 +/- 109.84 m(2)) than in nondegraded habitats (high plant diversity, high perennial grass cover and low shrub cover). We assume that this increase in daily movement distances and home range sizes is a behavioural plasticity to limited food resources in degraded savannah habitats. Although P. lineoocellata is able to adjust to resource-poor savannah habitats, the increase in the lizard's movement activities is likely to result in a higher predation risk. This is supported by the lower availability of protective vegetation i.e. perennial grass cover. Hence, we conclude that despite behavioural plasticity of P. lineoocellata, overgrazing has a severe negative impact on the space use of P. lineoocellata.
We studied the effects of overgrazing on the foraging behaviour of the lizard Pedioplanis l. lineoocellata (Spotted Sand Lizard), a sit-and-wait forager, in habitats of differing vegetation states to determine the effects of habitat degradation on this species. At high grazing intensity where vegetation cover and diversity is low, the lizard P. lineoocellata moves more frequently, spends more time moving and covers larger distances than in habitats where vegetation cover and diversity is high. These behavioural changes in movement patterns can be explained by less abundant prey in habitats with low vegetation cover and diversity. Although morphology, phylogeny and physiology of P. lineoocellata should constrain the change in foraging behaviour, the species has modified its foraging strategy from sit- and-wait to actively foraging. We assume that this behavioural flexibility of P. lineoocellata is a buffer mechanism enabling the species to use and survive in degraded (unfavourable) habitats.
In this study we investigated the effect of different land use options (wildlife versus livestock) on species richness of plants and reptiles in the protected Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (KTP) versus adjacent non-protected farmland within the same savanna habitat type (Aoub dune veld) in the southern Kalahari, South Africa. Our results show that both plant and reptile species richness as well as plant cover and reptile abundance was significantly higher in the protected KTP than in the non-protected farmland. The higher proportion of shrub but lower proportions of perennial grass cover, herb cover, and herb species richness in the farmland can be explained by higher stocking rates and the differences in feeding behaviour between native wild ungulates (e.g. Antidorcas marsupialis, Oryx gazella) and livestock (mainly sheep). The reptile's prey availability and microhabitats (perennial grass tussocks and rodent burrows) for thermoregulation and protection against predators were significantly lower in the farmland. To conclude, our results clearly show that long term effects of different land use options (wildlife in protected KTP versus extensive livestock production in the non-protected farmland) even within the same habitat type have led to significant changes in vegetation composition, availability of microhabitat structures and in the reptile community.
We investigated whether a given landscape structure affects the level of home range size adaptation in response to resource variability. We tested whether increasing resource variability forces herbivorous mammals to increase their home ranges. In 2014 and 2015 we collared 40 European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) with GPS-tags to record hare movements in two regions in Germany with differing landscape structures. We examined hare home range sizes in relation to resource availability and variability by using the normalized difference vegetation index as a proxy. Hares in simple landscapes showed increasing home range sizes with increasing resource variability, whereas hares in complex landscapes did not enlarge their home range. Animals in complex landscapes have the possibility to include various landscape elements within their home ranges and are more resilient against resource variability. But animals in simple landscapes with few elements experience shortcomings when resource variability becomes high. The increase in home range size, the movement related increase in energy expenditure, and a decrease in hare abundances can have severe implications for conservation of mammals in anthropogenic landscapes. Hence, conservation management could benefit from a better knowledge about fine-scaled effects of resource variability on movement behaviour.
Moving in the Anthropocene
(2018)
Animal movement is fundamental for ecosystem functioning and species survival, yet the effects of the anthropogenic footprint on animal movements have not been estimated across species. Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, we found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in areas with a low human footprint. We attribute this reduction to behavioral changes of individual animals and to the exclusion of species with long-range movements from areas with higher human impact. Global loss of vagility alters a key ecological trait of animals that affects not only population persistence but also ecosystem processes such as predator-prey interactions, nutrient cycling, and disease transmission.
Structural and animal species diversity in arid and semi-arid savannas of the southern Kalahari
(2004)
Understanding vegetation-modern pollen relationships is essential to provide confidence in fossil pollen reconstructions of long-term vegetation changes in savanna ecosystems. In this paper we compare the taxonomical composition and the diversity (Hill NO, N1, N2) of vegetation and modern pollen along precipitation and local grazing-intensity gradients in Namibian savannas. Modern pollen was extracted from surface soil samples collected from 5 x 5 m plots distributed along four 500 m gradients. Vegetation was surveyed in each plot. The results show a high correspondence between vegetation and pollen data in terms of composition. Precipitation and grazing explain a significant although low proportion of compositional change in the vegetation and pollen spectra. We identified pollen taxa as indicators of grazing pressure such as Limeum, Alternanthera, and particularly Tribulus. Correspondence between vegetation and pollen data in terms of taxa richness (NO) is limited, probably because of the influence of landscape heterogeneity and openness, as well as low pollen concentrations. In contrast, the effective numbers of common and dominant taxa (N1, N2) are consistent among the different datasets. We conclude that in spite of limitations, modern pollen assemblages can reflect changes in vegetation composition, richness and diversity patterns along precipitation and grazing gradients in savanna environments. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.