Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (75)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (29)
- Review (10)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Postprint (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
Institute
Inhalt: Umweltschutz als gesellschaftlicher Anspruch -Sustainable Development -Umweltorientierte Anspruchsgruppen einer Unternehmung -Die Betroffenheit der Unternehmen -Bedeutung von Anspruchsgruppen -Lebenszyklen von gesellschaftlichen Anliegen Umweltschutz als Unternehmensziel -Duales Zielkonzept -Priorität des Umweltschutzes -Konfliktfelder zwischen ökonomischen und ökologischen Zielen -Umweltschutz als Chance -Umweltschutz als ethischer Anspruch -Umweltaktive Verbände und Unternehmen Rahmenbedingungen umweltorientierter Unternehmensführung -Übersicht -Ökologie-Pull: das Umweltbewußtsein von Konsumenten, Ökologieorientierung im Handel -Ökologie-Push: Die EU-Umwelt-Auditing Verordnung Umweltmanagement -Das Umweltmanagement-Konzept -Übersicht: Strategien im Umweltmanagement -Ökologische Basisstrategien -Risikostrategien Instrumente des Umweltmanagements -Öko-Bilanzen -Umwelt- und Risikodialog
Umweltzeichen
(2001)
There are two fundamental ways in which consumers can express their concerns and obligations for society through their consumption decisions: They can boycott companies that they deem to be irresponsible or they may deliberately buy from companies that they perceive to act responsibly (‘buycott’). It has been largely ignored that individuals are driven by different motivational mechanisms to join boycotts and buycotts (punishment vs. reward of corporate behaviors), and thus, these mechanisms have disparate implications for the participating individual (e.g., high vs. low subjective costs because of a restriction in consumption habits). This paper fills this void and develops a framework suggesting that the extent to which consumers translate their concerns and obligations for society into a willingness to boycott and/or buycott is bounded by self-interest. Using a unique, representative sample of 1833 German consumers, this study reveals that the effects of environmental concerns and universalism on buycotting are amplified by hedonism, while the effects of social concern on buycotting and boycotting are attenuated by hedonism and simplicity, respectively. These results have far-reaching implications for organizations and policy planners who aim to change corporate behavior.
Vertrauen als zentrales Konstrukt der Geschäftsbeziehung zwischen Ärzten und Pharmaunternehmen
(2006)
Welfare beyond consumption
(2020)
In developed regions worldwide, so-called anti-consumers are increasingly resisting high-level consumption lifestyles or shifting to alternative forms of consumption. A general reduction in consumption levels is considered necessary to attain global sustainability goals. However, knowledge regarding the factors driving people to deliberately consume less and how anti-consumption affects individuals' well-being is limited. Against this background, this study considers the influence of human values and the well-being effects of two types of anti-consumption: voluntary simplicity and collaborative consumption. Based on representative data from the US (N = 1075) and Germany (N = 1070), the findings show that the two anti-consumption types do not reduce the well-being of individuals' but in some cases, even improve it, which suggests that lowering consumption can not only help protect environmental resources but also serve the greater good of society. In particular, this relationship holds among collaborative consumers with a strong need for cognition, i.e., a cognitive thinking style that involves a high level of decision control. According to the study results, opposite value orientations are the drivers of voluntary simplicity and collaborative consumption (i.e., a focus on self-transcendence versus self-enhancement). These findings are comparable in both countries; however, the strength of the effects differs.