Refine
Year of publication
- 2015 (77) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (55)
- Doctoral Thesis (9)
- Postprint (6)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Preprint (1)
- Review (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (77)
Keywords
- Patholinguistik (19)
- Sprachtherapie (19)
- geistige Behinderung (19)
- mental deficiency (19)
- patholinguistics (19)
- primary progessive aphasia (19)
- primär progessive Aphasie (19)
- speech therapy (19)
- interference (9)
- eye-tracking (7)
- German (6)
- cue-based retrieval (6)
- Spanish (4)
- ACT-R (3)
- Chinese reflexives (3)
- DLT (3)
- Swedish (3)
- activation (3)
- anaphors (3)
- antilocality (3)
- center embedding (3)
- child language (3)
- computational modeling (3)
- content-addressable memory (3)
- discourse (3)
- expectation (3)
- grammatical illusion (3)
- individual differences (3)
- intervention locality (3)
- locality (3)
- missing-VP effect (3)
- possessives (3)
- pronouns (3)
- reflexives (3)
- relative clauses (3)
- sentence parsing (3)
- visual-world paradigm (3)
- working memory capacity (3)
- working-memory (3)
- ziji (3)
- evidentiality (2)
- focus (2)
- formal semantics (2)
- prosody (2)
- scrambling (2)
- visual world paradigm (2)
- Acquisition (1)
- Adverbs (1)
- African languages (1)
- Agent-oriented adverbs (1)
- Aging (1)
- Agreement attraction (1)
- Aphasia (1)
- Arbeitsgedächtnis (1)
- Artificial language paradigm (1)
- Aspekt (1)
- Chadic (1)
- Chinese (1)
- Computermodell (1)
- Czech (1)
- Deutsch als Fremdsprache (1)
- Development (1)
- ERPs (1)
- English (1)
- Exceptional alternation (1)
- Eye movements (1)
- Eye-tracking (1)
- Fokus (1)
- Fokussensitivität (1)
- Formale Semantik (1)
- German intonation (1)
- Grassfields Bantu (1)
- Hemispheric specialization (1)
- Individual differences (1)
- L1 Polish (1)
- L2 German (1)
- Language production (1)
- Language understanding (1)
- Left middle and superior temporal gyri (1)
- Linguistics (1)
- Mandarin Chinese (1)
- Mental image (1)
- Morphological cues (1)
- Morphology (1)
- Motor planning/programming (1)
- Number morphology (1)
- Oculo-motor control (1)
- Online morpho-syntactic processing (1)
- Orthographie (1)
- Passive (1)
- Phonology (1)
- Phonotactics (1)
- Polnisch (1)
- Prediction (1)
- Projective meaning (1)
- Psycholinguistics (1)
- Psycholinguistik (1)
- Reading (1)
- Relative clause (1)
- Russian (1)
- Scanpaths (1)
- Second language (1)
- Sentence comprehension (1)
- Sentence comprehension deficits (1)
- Sentence processing (1)
- Situationssemantik (1)
- Speech perception (1)
- Speech production (1)
- Structural expectation (1)
- Substance (1)
- Surprisal (1)
- Syntax (1)
- Tempus (1)
- Textstruktur (1)
- Tool use demonstration (1)
- Tool use pantomime (1)
- Tschadisch (1)
- Turkish-German bilingualism (1)
- Vietnamese (1)
- Vokalperzeption (1)
- Vokalproduktion (1)
- Working-memory (1)
- Zeitungskommentare (1)
- acceptability judgments (1)
- afrikanische Sprachen (1)
- ambiguity resolution (1)
- aphasia treatment (1)
- aspect (1)
- bilingualism (1)
- compounding (1)
- computational model (1)
- contrast (1)
- cross-modal generalization (1)
- cross-modal priming (1)
- culture (1)
- definiteness (1)
- experiments (1)
- exploitation (1)
- eye movement (1)
- eye movements (1)
- eye-movements (1)
- focus sensitivity (1)
- focus-sensitivity (1)
- formal syntax (1)
- formale Semantik (1)
- gender (1)
- givenness (1)
- heritage language (1)
- inference (1)
- information source (1)
- linguistic annotation (1)
- linguistic corpus (1)
- linguistische Annotation (1)
- linguistisches Korpus (1)
- memory retrieval (1)
- modal verbs (1)
- modality (1)
- morphological processing (1)
- motherhood (1)
- movement (1)
- newspaper commentary (1)
- orthography (1)
- perception of contrast (1)
- pragmaticalisation (1)
- presupposition (1)
- production of contrast (1)
- pronoun resolution (1)
- psycholinguistics (1)
- quantification (1)
- quantifier-spreading (1)
- reading (1)
- referential context (1)
- relative clause (1)
- rise-fall contour (1)
- second language (1)
- self-paced reading (1)
- semantic-congruency task (1)
- semantics (1)
- sentence comprehension (1)
- sentence processing (1)
- sentence production (1)
- situation semantics (1)
- syntactic processing of noncanonical sentences (1)
- syntax (1)
- tense (1)
- text structure (1)
- theticity (1)
- topic (1)
- traditional expectations (1)
- universal quantifiers (1)
- visual attention (1)
- vowel perception (1)
- vowel production (1)
- witnessing (1)
- working memory (1)
Institute
- Department Linguistik (77) (remove)
Sentences with doubly center-embedded relative clauses in which a verb phrase (VP) is missing are sometimes perceived as grammatical, thus giving rise to an illusion of grammaticality. In this paper, we provide a new account of why missing-VP sentences, which are both complex and ungrammatical, lead to an illusion of grammaticality, the so-called missing-VP effect. We propose that the missing-VP effect in particular, and processing difficulties with multiply center-embedded clauses more generally, are best understood as resulting from interference during cue-based retrieval. When processing a sentence with double center-embedding, a retrieval error due to interference can cause the verb of an embedded clause to be erroneously attached into a higher clause. This can lead to an illusion of grammaticality in the case of missing-VP sentences and to processing complexity in the case of complete sentences with double center-embedding. Evidence for an interference account of the missing-VP effect comes from experiments that have investigated the missing-VP effect in German using a speeded grammaticality judgments procedure. We review this evidence and then present two new experiments that show that the missing-VP effect can be found in German also with less restricting procedures. One experiment was a questionnaire study which required grammaticality judgments from participants without imposing any time constraints. The second experiment used a self-paced reading procedure and did not require any judgments. Both experiments confirm the prior findings of missing-VP effects in German and also show that the missing-VP effect is subject to a primacy effect as known from the memory literature. Based on this evidence, we argue that an account of missing-VP effects in terms of interference during cue-based retrieval is superior to accounts in terms of limited memory resources or in terms of experience with embedded structures.
We conducted two eye-tracking experiments investigating the processing of the Mandarin reflexive ziji in order to tease apart structurally constrained accounts from standard cue-based accounts of memory retrieval. In both experiments, we tested whether structurally inaccessible distractors that fulfill the animacy requirement of ziji influence processing times at the reflexive. In Experiment 1, we manipulated animacy of the antecedent and a structurally inaccessible distractor intervening between the antecedent and the reflexive. In conditions where the accessible antecedent mismatched the animacy cue, we found inhibitory interference whereas in antecedent-match conditions, no effect of the distractor was observed. In Experiment 2, we tested only antecedent-match configurations and manipulated locality of the reflexive-antecedent binding (Mandarin allows non-local binding). Participants were asked to hold three distractors (animate vs. inanimate nouns) in memory while reading the target sentence. We found slower reading times when animate distractors were held in memory (inhibitory interference). Moreover, we replicated the locality effect reported in previous studies. These results are incompatible with structure-based accounts. However, the cue-based ACT-R model of Lewis and Vasishth (2005) cannot explain the observed pattern either. We therefore extend the original ACT-R model and show how this model not only explains the data presented in this article, but is also able to account for previously unexplained patterns in the literature on reflexive processing.
Two classes of account have been proposed to explain the memory processes subserving the processing of reflexive-antecedent dependencies. Structure-based accounts assume that the retrieval of the antecedent is guided by syntactic tree-configurational information without considering other kinds of information such as gender marking in the case of English reflexives. By contrast, unconstrained cue-based retrieval assumes that all available information is used for retrieving the antecedent. Similarity-based interference effects from structurally illicit distractors which match a non-structural retrieval cue have been interpreted as evidence favoring the unconstrained cue-based retrieval account since cue-based retrieval interference from structurally illicit distractors is incompatible with the structure-based account. However, it has been argued that the observed effects do not necessarily reflect interference occurring at the moment of retrieval but might equally well be accounted for by interference occurring already at the stage of encoding or maintaining the antecedent in memory, in which case they cannot be taken as evidence against the structure-based account. We present three experiments (self-paced reading and eye-tracking) on German reflexives and Swedish reflexive and pronominal possessives in which we pit the predictions of encoding interference and cue-based retrieval interference against each other. We could not find any indication that encoding interference affects the processing ease of the reflexive-antecedent dependency formation. Thus, there is no evidence that encoding interference might be the explanation for the interference effects observed in previous work. We therefore conclude that invoking encoding interference may not be a plausible way to reconcile interference effects with a structure-based account of reflexive processing.
This dissertation addresses the question of how linguistic structures can be represented in working memory. We propose a memory-based computational model that derives offline and online complexity profiles in terms of a top-down parser for minimalist grammars (Stabler, 2011). The complexity metric reflects the amount of time an item is stored in memory. The presented architecture links grammatical representations stored in memory directly to the cognitive behavior by deriving predictions about sentence processing difficulty.
Results from five different sentence comprehension experiments were used to evaluate the model's assumptions about memory limitations. The predictions of the complexity metric were compared to the locality (integration and storage) cost metric of Dependency Locality Theory (Gibson, 2000). Both metrics make comparable offline and online predictions for four of the five phenomena. The key difference between the two metrics is that the proposed complexity metric accounts for the structural complexity of intervening material. In contrast, DLT's integration cost metric considers the number of discourse referents, not the syntactic structural complexity.
We conclude that the syntactic analysis plays a significant role in memory requirements of parsing. An incremental top-down parser based on a grammar formalism easily computes offline and online complexity profiles, which can be used to derive predictions about sentence processing difficulty.
There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.
There is a wealth of evidence showing that increasing the distance between an argument and its head leads to more processing effort, namely, locality effects; these are usually associated with constraints in working memory (DLT: Gibson, 2000; activation-based model: Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). In SOV languages, however, the opposite effect has been found: antilocality (see discussion in Levy et al., 2013). Antilocality effects can be explained by the expectation-based approach as proposed by Levy (2008) or by the activation-based model of sentence processing as proposed by Lewis and Vasishth (2005). We report an eye-tracking and a self-paced reading study with sentences in Spanish together with measures of individual differences to examine the distinction between expectation- and memory-based accounts, and within memory-based accounts the further distinction between DLT and the activation-based model. The experiments show that (i) antilocality effects as predicted by the expectation account appear only for high-capacity readers; (ii) increasing dependency length by interposing material that modifies the head of the dependency (the verb) produces stronger facilitation than increasing dependency length with material that does not modify the head; this is in agreement with the activation-based model but not with the expectation account; and (iii) a possible outcome of memory load on low-capacity readers is the increase in regressive saccades (locality effects as predicted by memory-based accounts) or, surprisingly, a speedup in the self-paced reading task; the latter consistent with good-enough parsing (Ferreira et al., 2002). In sum, the study suggests that individual differences in working memory capacity play a role in dependency resolution, and that some of the aspects of dependency resolution can be best explained with the activation-based model together with a prediction component.