Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (531) (remove)
Language
- German (459)
- English (46)
- Multiple languages (19)
- Hebrew (6)
- Spanish (1)
Keywords
- Logopädie (73)
- Zeitschrift (71)
- Patholinguistik (16)
- patholinguistics (16)
- Sprachtherapie (15)
- 1799-1804 (14)
- Judentum (13)
- speech/language therapy (12)
- BBAW (9)
- Kosmos (9)
Institute
- Referat für Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (123)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (80)
- Institut für Romanistik (55)
- Historisches Institut (37)
- Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (31)
- Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) (31)
- Arbeitskreis Militär und Gesellschaft in der Frühen Neuzeit e. V. (30)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (25)
- Extern (22)
- Dezernat 2: Studienangelegenheiten (16)
forum:logopädie 26.2012, 6
(2012)
forum:logopädie 27.2013, 3
(2013)
forum:logopädie 26.2012, 5
(2012)
forum:logopädie 28.2014, 2
(2014)
forum:logopädie 26.2012, 2
(2012)
forum:logopädie 26.2012, 4
(2012)
forum:logopädie 35.2021, 1
(2021)
forum:logopädie 28.2014, 3
(2014)
forum:logopädie 28.2014, 4
(2014)
According to Haider (2010), we have to distinguish three types of infinitival complements in Present-Day German: (i) CP complements, (ii) VP complements and (iii) verbal clusters. While CP complements give rise to biclausal structures, VP complements and verbal clusters indicate a monoclausal structure. Non-finite verbs in verbal clusters build a syntactic unit with the governing verb. It is only the last infinitival pattern that we address as a so-called coherent infinitival pattern, a notion introduced in the influential work of Bech (1955/57). Verbal clusters are bound to languages with an OV grammar, hence the well-known differences regarding infinitival syntax in German and English (Haider 2003, Bobaljik 2004). On the widespread assumption that German has been an OV language throughout its history (Axel 2007), we expect all three types of infinitival complements to be present from the earliest attestions of German.
forum:logopädie 26.2012, 1
(2012)
forum:logopädie 37.2023, 5
(2023)
forum:logopädie 26.2012, 3
(2012)
forum:logopädie 31.2017, 2
(2017)
forum:logopädie 29.2015, 5
(2015)
forum:logopädie 27.2013, 1
(2013)
forum:logopädie 28.2014, 6
(2014)
forum:logopädie 29.2015, 3
(2015)
forum:logopädie 29.2015, 1
(2015)
forum:logopädie 29.2015, 6
(2015)
forum:logopädie 29.2015, 4
(2015)
forum:logopädie 30.2016, 3
(2016)
forum:logopädie 33.2019, 1
(2019)
forum:logopädie 36.2022, 6
(2022)
forum:logopädie 29.2015, 2
(2015)
forum:logopädie 28.2014, 5
(2014)
forum:logopädie 30.2016, 2
(2016)
forum:logopädie 30.2016, 1
(2016)
forum:logopädie 27.2013, 2
(2013)
In terms of historiographical potential and literary value, depictions of the lives of others are considered inferior to autobiographies. One finds autobiographies, which promise to provide exclusive insights into the historical inner worlds, epistemically more revealing. While their study has become a very important part of Jewish Studies, investigations into the life stories of others represent a notable research gap. This issue takes this remarkable bias in the perception of the two genres within Jewish Studies as its starting point. The contributions gathered here interrogate historical examples of biographical narrative with the aim of unlocking its historiographical potentials and thus highlighting the relevance of biographical writing for the study of Jewish cultures.