Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (32856) (remove)
Language
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (32856) (remove)
Keywords
- climate change (95)
- Germany (76)
- stars: massive (58)
- diffusion (47)
- stars: early-type (47)
- German (46)
- gamma rays: general (46)
- stars: winds, outflows (45)
- Arabidopsis thaliana (43)
- Climate change (43)
Institute
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (4146)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (3788)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (2823)
- Institut für Chemie (2415)
- Department Psychologie (1761)
- Institut für Romanistik (1130)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1108)
- Institut für Mathematik (1064)
- Historisches Institut (1050)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (1042)
Modality in Kakataibo
(2015)
This paper explores the semantic space of modality in Kakataibo
(Panoan). It is found that Kakataibo makes a distinction in the modal
space based on the modality type. Circumstantial modality is encoded
by a construction while the epistemic space is conveyed by the second
position enclitics =dapi ‘inferential’, =id ‘second-hand information’
and =kuni ‘contrastive assertion’. However, none of these strategies to
encode modality restricts the quantificational force, leaving it
underspecified. These facts are consistent with the predictions of
current typologies of modal systems.
It has been observed for many African languages that focussed subjects
have to appear outside of their syntactic base position, as opposed to
focussed objects, which can remain in-situ. This is known as subjectobject
asymmetry of focus marking, which Fiedler et al. (2010) claim
to hold also for Akan. Genzel (2013), on the other hand, argues that
Akan does not exhibit a subject-object focus asymmetry. A questionnaire
study and a production experiment were carried out to investigate
whether focussed subjects may indeed be realized in-situ in Akan. The
results suggest that (i) focussed subjects do not have to be obligatorily
realized ex-situ, and that (ii) the syntactic preference for the realization
of a focussed subject highly depends on exhaustivity.
Sentence type marking is realized by two suffixes in Aymara, one marks
declaratives and the other polar sentences (polar questions and negated
sentences) by picking out one or two propositions, respectively. A third
suffix, initially associated with wh-questions, turns out to be a (scalar)
additive and unrelated to sentence type. The sentence-type-related suffixes
associate with focus and the additive can associate with focus by
attaching to the focused constituent.
According to Aikhenvald (2007:5), descriptive linguistics or linguistic
fieldwork “ideally involves observing the language as it is used,
becoming a member of the community, and often being adopted into
the kinship system”. Descriptive linguistics therefore differs from
theoretical linguistics in that while the former seeks to describe natural
languages as they are used, the latter, other than describing, attempts
to give explanations on how or why language phenomena behave in
certain ways. Thus, I will abstract away from any preconceived ideas
on how sentences ought to be in Awing and take the linguist/reader
through focus and interrogative constructions to get a feeling of how
the Awing people interact verbally.
This paper reopens the discussion on focus marking in Akan (Kwa,
Niger-Congo) by examining the semantics of the so-called focus marker
in the language. It is shown that the so-called focus marker expresses
exhaustivity when it occurs in a sentence with narrow focus. The study
employs four standard tests for exhaustivity proposed in the literature
to examine the semantics of Akan focus constructions (Szabolsci 1981,
1994; É. Kiss 1998; Hartmann and Zimmermann 2007). It is shown that
although a focused entity with the so-called focus marker nà is
interpreted to mean ‘only X and nothing/nobody else,’ this meaning
appears to be pragmatic.
ה"חוק" וה"טבע" בברית המילה
(2015)
בפתח מאמר זה נידון המונח המקראי "חוק" (כבכתוב: אִם בְּחֻקֹּתַי תֵּלֵכוּ". ויקרא כו, ג-ד) באמצעות הצגת נקודות המבט השונות של החכמים הדנים בכך במדרש הארצישראלי "ויקרא רבה".
בחלקו השני של המאמר נידון המקרה הספציפי של מצוות ברית המילה - כדוגמא קלאסית למצווה המכונה בפי החכמים "חוק".
המאמר דן בטעמים השונים שניתנו למצווה זו (כולל אלו שהועלו בתקופה המודרנית ברוח ההסברים האנתרופולוגיים והפסיכואנליטיים); ובסיומו של הדיון מועלה לדיון ויכוח - מקורי עד כמה שניתן לשער - שנשתמר בתלמוד, בין חכם ארצישראלי בן מאה השלישית, רבי עקיבא, ובין רומאי בשם טורנוסרופוס (או טוניוס רופוס) המייצג את תפיסת ה"טבע" הרומית.
האחרון מתקיף את רבי עקיבא בנוגע לברית המילה בטענה שהיהודים מטילים בברית המילה מום בגוף התינוק. תשובת רבי עקיבא מנותחת מנקודת הראות המתמקדת במתח שבין "טבע"
Don't worry - be happy?
(2015)