Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (284) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2015 (284) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (93)
- Doctoral Thesis (92)
- Part of a Book (48)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (31)
- Review (6)
- Other (4)
- Part of Periodical (3)
- Preprint (3)
- Course Material (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Language
- German (284) (remove)
Keywords
- German classic (2)
- German misery (2)
- Heiner Müller (2)
- Jaspers (2)
- Linguistik (2)
- Lukacs (2)
- Marxism (2)
- Wirtschaft (2)
- autocracy (2)
- collective guilt (2)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (36)
- Historisches Institut (29)
- Öffentliches Recht (22)
- Bürgerliches Recht (16)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (16)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (16)
- Sozialwissenschaften (16)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (12)
- Institut für Romanistik (12)
- Department Psychologie (8)
DFbeta
(2015)
Back pain is a complex phenomenon that goes beyond a simple medical diagnosis. The aetiology and chronification of back pain can be best described as an interaction between biological, psychological, and social processes. However, to date, multimodal prevention and intervention programs for back pain that target all three aetiological factors have demonstrated limited effectiveness. This lack of supportive evidence for multimodal programmes in the treatment of back pain could be due to the fact that few programs are suitable for long-term and unsupervised use in everyday life. Moreover, in combining the elements from various therapies, little attention has been paid to the mechanisms underlying the synergistic effects of the separate components. In this contribution, we will describe the development of a new multimodal intervention for back pain that set out to address these limitations. To this end, the biological elements of neuromuscular adaptation is supplemented with cognitive behavioral and psychophysiological techniques in an intervention that can be followed at home as well as in clinics, and that is suitable for all grades of pain. The efficacy of this intervention will be tested in a multicentric randomized controlled longitudinal trial (n = 714) at five time points over a period of 6 months. Here we will describe the development and the content of this new intervention.
Der Nötigungsnotstand
(2015)
Der maskierte Voltaire
(2015)
Voltaire schrieb mit spitzer Feder, doch verbarg er seine Kritik mittels verdeckter Schreibarten. So schlüpft er in der Tischrunde der großen abendländischen Satiriker abwechselnd in die Masken von Lukian, Erasmus und Rabelais, um verwandte Geister miteinander sprechen zu lassen. – Im Drama Mahomet inszeniert er religiösen Fanatismus und Glaubenskriege als die große „Geißel“ der Menschheit. – Candide gerät als autofiktionale Spiegelung Voltaires und des Preußenkönigs Friedrich zu einer versteckten Abrechnung mit dem Freund. – Eine weite Lesart des Candide, eine Neuinterpretation unter dem Aspekt von Heterotopie und Heterologie, rückt die Neue Welt in den Blick. Unter Rückgriff auf das kartographische Imaginaire der Entdecker verwandeln sich geographische Orte in Heterotopien. Aspekte der Kolonialismuskritik und Globalisierung erweisen sich hier erstmals als eine wesentliche Strategie zur Ironisierung der ‚besten aller möglichen Welten‘.
Der kurdische Knoten
(2015)
The fourth volume in the LAPASEC series (Landau-Paris Studies on the Eighteenth Century), this collection of essays is based on an international conference held in Landau, in June 2014. The symposium united scholars from the United States, Britain, France, Germany, and Spain. The best papers delivered at this occasion were augmented with additional contributions by scholars working on aspects of the (landscape) garden in the long eighteenth century. Focussing on some neglected aspects of the discourse on gardens in the Enlightenment and in early Romanticism, the book systematically unfolds the variety and importance of European garden culture in a comparative perspective. Particular attention is given to the special configuration of discourses concerned with the garden that actually had an impact on writing and planning. This configuration consisted of theory, praxis, and the metaphorical as well as concrete appropriation of both. This is the reason why the book is divided into three parts – the theory of gardens, the garden as utopos and eutopos between Cythera and pleasure garden, and the exotic (non-European) garden and its influence on the Old World. The assessment of the discourse on gardens of the long eighteenth century thus covers a relatively large area. What the three parts have in common is the fact that they focus especially on the rhizomatic connection of the discourses. Partly derived from botany, the idea of the rhizome, further developed and theorized by Deleuze and Guattari, seems to be a concept of thinking that is particularly well suited for the enterprise undertaken in this book. With the present collection of scholarly essays from five countries, the editors hope to make accessible important contemporary research on the garden in the spirit of Voltaire who famously urged his contemporaries: "il faut cultiver notre jardin". This book not only "cultivates" the garden in Voltaire's sense, it also demonstrates how the discourse on the garden affected.