Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (22) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (17)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Postprint (1)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (22) (remove)
Keywords
- COVID-19 (22) (remove)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (4)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (4)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (3)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering gGmbH (3)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (2)
- Sozialwissenschaften (2)
- Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA) (1)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (1)
- Department Psychologie (1)
- Extern (1)
COVID-19
(2021)
We investigate how the economic consequences of the pandemic and the government-mandated measures to contain its spread affect the self-employed — particularly women — in Germany. For our analysis, we use representative, real-time survey data in which respondents were asked about their situation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings indicate that among the self-employed, who generally face a higher likelihood of income losses due to COVID-19 than employees, women are about one-third more likely to experience income losses than their male counterparts. We do not find a comparable gender gap among employees. Our results further suggest that the gender gap among the self-employed is largely explained by the fact that women disproportionately work in industries that are more severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis of potential mechanisms reveals that women are significantly more likely to be impacted by government-imposed restrictions, e.g., the regulation of opening hours. We conclude that future policy measures intending to mitigate the consequences of such shocks should account for this considerable variation in economic hardship.
Reacting, fast and slow
(2021)
The COVID-19 pandemic created extraordinary challenges for governments to safeguard the well-being of their people. To what extent has leaders' reliance on scientific advice shaped government responses to the COVID-19 outbreak? We argue that leaders who tend to orient themselves on expert advice realized the extent of the crisis earlier. Consequently, these governments would adopt containment measures relatively quickly, despite the high uncertainty they faced. Over time, differences in government responses based on the use of science would dissipate due to herding effects. We test our argument on data combining 163 government responses to the pandemic with national- and individual-level characteristics. Consistent with our argument, we find that countries governed by politicians with a stronger technocratic mentality, approximated by holding a PhD, adopted restrictive containment measures faster in the early, but not in the later, stages of the crisis. This importance of expert-based leadership plausibly extends to other large-scale societal crises.