Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (30)
- Review (12)
- Part of Periodical (10)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (5)
- Master's Thesis (2)
- Journal/Publication series (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (60) (remove)
Keywords
- Jewish Studies (17)
- Jüdische Studien (17)
- Genisa (14)
- Geniza (14)
- 20. Jahrhundert (3)
- 20th century (3)
- Ländliches Judentum (3)
- Rural Jewry (3)
- USA (3)
- deutsch-jüdische Geschichte (3)
- moderne jüdische Geschichte (3)
- 19. Jahrhundert (2)
- 19th century (2)
- Franconia (2)
- Franken (2)
- German Jewish history (2)
- Landesgeschichte (2)
- Modern Jewish history (2)
- United States (2)
- book history (2)
- modern Jewish history (2)
- regional history (2)
- transnationale Studien (2)
- Abraham Geiger (1)
- American Judaism (1)
- American history (1)
- Bibel (1)
- Bible (1)
- Buchgeschichte (1)
- Central Europe (1)
- Christian state (1)
- Denkmalpflege (1)
- European Jewish history (1)
- Familiengeschichte (1)
- Frauenerwerbsarbeit (1)
- Frühe Neuzeit (1)
- Galicia (1)
- Gay Outreach Synagogues (1)
- Gender und Queer Studies (1)
- Genealogie (1)
- Germany (1)
- Geschichte (1)
- Grabkunst (1)
- Habsburg Empire (1)
- Habsburg Studies (1)
- Habsburgisches Reich (1)
- Habsburgstudien (1)
- Hebrew (1)
- Hebräisch (1)
- Intersections (1)
- Israel (1)
- Jewish Maritime Studies (1)
- Jewish Sea (1)
- Jewish cemeteries (1)
- Jewish cultural history (1)
- Jewish denominations (1)
- Jewish historiography (1)
- Jewish maid (1)
- Jewish theology (1)
- Jews (1)
- Jews in the Netherlands (1)
- Jiddisch (1)
- Juden (1)
- Juden in den Niederlanden (1)
- Jüdisch-Maritime Studien (1)
- Jüdische Denominationen (1)
- Jüdische Dienstmädchen (1)
- Jüdische Friedhöfe (1)
- Jüdische Meer (1)
- Kulturtransfer (1)
- Lehrmaterial (1)
- Leopold Zunz (1)
- Ludwig Philippson (1)
- Maritime Räume (1)
- Maritime spaces (1)
- Migration (1)
- Military chaplaincy (1)
- Moderne Jüdische Geschichte (1)
- Pluralism (1)
- Potsdam (1)
- Queer (1)
- Queer History (1)
- Queer Jewish History (1)
- Queer Judaism (1)
- Queeres Judentum (1)
- Reform Judaism (1)
- Reformjudentum (1)
- Ritual (1)
- Samuel Tolkowsky (1)
- Science of Judaism (1)
- Seafaring (1)
- Secularism (1)
- Seefahrtswesen (1)
- Social History (1)
- Sozialgeschichte (1)
- Stellenanzeigen (1)
- Translations (1)
- Verlagsgeschichte (1)
- Wissenschaft des Judentums (1)
- Yiddish (1)
- Zentraleuropa (1)
- cultural history (1)
- cultural pluralism (1)
- cultural transfer (1)
- early modern history (1)
- education (1)
- family history (1)
- female labour (1)
- genealogy (1)
- grave design (1)
- historiography (1)
- history (1)
- history and memory (1)
- interfaith dialogue (1)
- job advertisements (1)
- jüdische Geschichtsschreibung (1)
- jüdische Kulturgeschichte (1)
- migration (1)
- modern Judaism (1)
- monument preservation (1)
- publishing (1)
- publishing history (1)
- rabbinical seminaries (1)
- ritual (1)
- teaching material (1)
- transnational history (1)
- transnational studies (1)
- Überschneidungen (1)
- Übersetzungen (1)
Institute
- Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (60) (remove)
In the aftermath of the Shoah and the ostensible triumph of nationalism, it became common in historiography to relegate Jews to the position of the “eternal other” in a series of binaries: Christian/Jewish, Gentile/Jewish, European/Jewish, non-Jewish/Jewish, and so forth. For the longest time, these binaries remained characteristic of Jewish historiography, including in the Central European context. Assuming instead, as the more recent approaches in Habsburg studies do, that pluriculturalism was the basis of common experience in formerly Habsburg Central Europe, and accepting that no single “majority culture” existed, but rather hegemonies were imposed in certain contexts, then the often used binaries are misleading and conceal the complex and sometimes even paradoxical conditions that shaped Jewish life in the region before the Shoah.
The very complexity of Habsburg Central Europe both in synchronic and diachronic perspective precludes any singular historical narrative of “Habsburg Jewry,” and it is not the intention of this volume to offer an overview of “Habsburg Jewish history.” The selected articles in this volume illustrate instead how important it is to reevaluate categories, deconstruct historical narratives, and reconceptualize implemented approaches in specific geographic, temporal, and cultural contexts in order to gain a better understanding of the complex and pluricultural history of the Habsburg Empire and the region as a whole.
“They Took to the Sea”
(2023)
The sea and maritime spaces have long been neglected in the field of Jewish studies despite their relevance in the context of Jewish religious texts and historical narratives. The images of Noah’s arche, king Salomon’s maritime activities or the miracle of the parting of the Red Sea immediately come into mind, however, only illustrate a few aspects of Jewish maritime activities. Consequently, the relations of Jews and the sea has to be seen in a much broader spatial and temporal framework in order to understand the overall importance of maritime spaces in Jewish history and culture.
Almost sixty years after Samuel Tolkowsky’s pivotal study on maritime Jewish history and culture and the publication of his book “They Took to the Sea” in 1964, this volume of PaRDeS seeks to follow these ideas, revisit Jewish history and culture from different maritime perspectives and shed new light on current research in the field, which brings together Jewish and maritime studies.
The articles in this volume therefore reflect a wide range of topics and illustrate how maritime perspectives can enrich our understanding of Jewish history and culture and its entanglement with the sea – especially in modern times. They study different spaces and examine their embedded narratives and functions. They follow in one way or another the discussions which evolved in the last decades, focused on the importance of spatial dimensions and opened up possibilities for studying the production and construction of spaces, their influences on cultural practices and ideas, as well as structures and changes of social processes. By taking these debates into account, the articles offer new insights into Jewish history and culture by taking us out to “sea” and inviting us to revisit Jewish history and culture from different maritime perspectives.
Genisa-Blätter IV
(2023)
Auch wenn Genisot – jüdische Ablagen nicht mehr verwendeter Bücher und Kultgegenstände – in der bisherigen historischen Forschung selten beachtet werden, sind sie als Quellen aus originär jüdischer Hand von hoher Bedeutung und können unser Verständnis der Umsetzung von Ritualen im Kontext der lokalen Gemeinde vertiefen.
Der Schwerpunkt der ‚Genisa-Blätter IV‘ liegt auf Fragen nach jüdisch-rituellen Praktiken und ihrer Bedeutung, ihren Objekten und Akteuren. Acht wissenschaftliche und ein essayistischer Beitrag nähern sich diesen Themen über konkrete Funde aus Genisot mitteleuropäischer jüdischer Gemeinden, von religiösen Texten wie dem Fragment einer Torarolle und einem Minhagim-Buch über Personaldokumente bis hin zu Musiknoten und Kleidungsstücken.
When he founded Schocken Books in 1945, department store magnate, philanthropist, and publisher Salman Schocken (1877–1959) called his new American publishing business an imitation of its German predecessor, which had functioned from 1931 until 1938. He intended it to replicate the success of the Berlin Schocken Verlag by spiritually fortifying a Jewish community uncertain in its identity. The new company reflected the transnational transfer of people, ideas, and texts between Germany, Palestine/Israel, and the United States. Its success and near-failure raise questions about transnationalism and American Jewish culture: Can a culture be imposed on a population which has its own organs and agencies of cultural production? Had American Jewish culture developed organically to the specific place where several million Jews found themselves and according to uniquely American cultural patterns? The answers suggest that the concepts of transnationalism and cultural transfer complement each other as tools to analyze American Jewry in its American and Jewish contexts.
Foreign Entanglements
(2021)
The field of American Jewish studies has recently trained its focus on the transnational dimensions of its subject, reflecting in more sustained ways than before about the theories and methods of this approach. Yet, much of the insight to be gained from seeing American Jewry as constitutively entangled in many ways with other Jewries has not yet been realized. Transnational American Jewish studies are still in their infancy.
This issue of PaRDeS presents current research on the multiple entanglements of American with Central European, especially German-speaking Jewries in the 19th and 20th centuries. The articles reflect the wide range of topics that can benefit from a transnational understanding of the American Jewish experience as shaped by its foreign entanglements.
Jewish theology in Germany
(2017)
How often do secular and religious discourses communicate and interrelate at points where they intersect in society? When the Science of Judaism (Wissenschaft des Judentums) evolved at the beginning of the nineteenth century, it intended, through both theological and secular studies, to demonstrate the general value of Jewish culture and civilization. Although denied a place in the public university system until after the Shoah, Jewish Studies departments have since been established at various German universities, and, in 2013, the School of Jewish Theology of the University of Potsdam was opened as the first Jewish divinity school in the history of the German university system. With this, what was once a utopian dream became a reality, and both branches of the Science of Judaism, religious and secular, became undisputed parts of the German academic scene, using similar tools for differing aims. Two prime examples of the intersection of the secular and religious in Germany today are the proliferation of divinity schools at state universities, on the one hand, and the development of military chaplaincy in the armed forces, on the other. Both of these, through contractual agreements, aim to regulate and facilitate religious pluralism within a secular state. While the one has already begun to take place, the other is currently under discussion.
Arbeit, Religion, Ruf
(2021)
Die Arbeit als Dienstmädchen stellte im Europa des 19. Jahrhunderts die weitverbreitetste Erwerbstätigkeit von Frauen dar. Oft erwies sie sich als die einzige Möglichkeit, trotz mangelnder Schulbildung und fehlender beruflicher Qualifikationen einen Lebensunterhalt zu bestreiten. In der Regel bewarben sich junge Mädchen, die vor der Gründung eines eigenen Haushalts Geld verdienen wollten. Aber auch ältere Frauen, die unverheiratet blieben, waren teils ihr Leben lang auf den Beruf als Dienstbotin angewiesen.
In den jüdischen Bürgerhaushalten der Niederlande, insbesondere in den zu dieser Zeit blühenden jüdischen Gemeinden in Amsterdam und anderen Großstädten, sah dies nicht anders aus. Auch dort putzten, kochten und stickten Dienstmädchen. Sie nahmen sich der Kindererziehung an und interagierten mit KollegInnen und ArbeitgeberInnen. Vor allem wegen eines Mangels an schriftlichen Quellen ist bisher jedoch wenig über dieses Kapitel jüdischer und weiblicher Erwerbsgeschichte bekannt.
Die vorliegende Studie wirft mit Hilfe von Stellenanzeigen für und von jüdischen Dienstmädchen Licht auf diese Berufsgruppe in den Jahren zwischen 1894 und 1925. Es wird ein Korpus von 540 Inseraten aus der vielgelesenen niederländischen Wochenzeitung Nieuw Israelietisch Weekblad diskursanalytisch untersucht, was neue Erkenntnisse über Leben und Arbeit der Dienstbotinnen zu Tage fördert. Die Anzeigen thematisieren sowohl das gesellschaftliche Ansehen der Frauen, ihre Aufgaben, Qualifikationen und finanziellen Ansprüche sowie ihre Religiosität. Durch einen Vergleich von Anzeigen aus drei Jahrzehnten kann die Studie aufzeigen, wie sich Einstellungen gegenüber dem Dienstmädchenberuf veränderten und sowohl Angestellte als auch ArbeitgeberInnen im Laufe der Zeit neue Maßstäbe an die häusliche Arbeit anlegten.
Obituary
(2020)
In 1924, the Berlin ophthalmologist Arthur Czellitzer (1871–1943) and like-minded members of the local Jewish community founded the Society for Jewish Family Research. A year later, the Society launched the journal Jüdische Familienforschung (Jewish Family Research), edited by Czellitzer. The Society was an outstanding platform of professional academic and amateur researchers and promoted a type of Jewish genealogy and family history that was shaped by the historical-medical discourse of the time. The concepts and methods of both the biological sciences and Wissenschaft des Judentums shaped and defined the academic approach to family research and history in Czellitzer’s and the Society’s work. The Society soon became the leading international association for the academic Jewish genealogical research. Despite of its brutal end in 1938, Arthur Czellitzer’s and the Society’s works, the issues raised, and the methods they created shape Jewish family research and genealogy until today.
The Jewish family has been the subject of much admiration and analysis, criticism and myth-making, not just but especially in modern times. As a field of inquiry, its place is at the intersection – or in the shadow – of the great topics in Jewish Studies and its contributing disciplines. Among them are the modernization and privatization of Judaism and Jewish life; integration and distinctiveness of Jews as individuals and as a group; gender roles and education. These and related questions have been the focus of modern Jewish family research, which took shape as a discipline in the 1910s.
This issue of PaRDeS traces the origins of academic Jewish family research and takes stock of its development over a century, with its ruptures that have added to the importance of familial roots and continuities. A special section retrieves the founder of the field, Arthur Czellitzer (1871–1943), his biography and work from oblivion and places him in the context of early 20th-century science and Jewish life.
The articles on current questions of Jewish family history reflect the topic’s potential for shedding new light on key questions in Jewish Studies past and present. Their thematic range – from 13th-century Yiddish Arthurian romances via family-based business practices in 19th-century Hungary and Germany, to concepts of Jewish parenthood in Imperial Russia – illustrates the broad interest in Jewish family research as a paradigm for early modern and modern Jewish Studies.
“Jewish, Gay and Proud”
(2020)
This publication examines the foundation and institutional integration of the first gay-lesbian synagogue Beth Chayim Chadashim, which was founded in Los Angeles in 1972. As early as June 1974, the synagogue was admitted to the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, the umbrella organization of the Reform congregations in the United States. Previously, the potential acceptance of a congregation by and for homosexual Jews triggered an intense and broad debate within Reform Judaism. The work asks how it was possible to successfully establish a gay-lesbian synagogue at a time when homosexual acts were considered unnatural and contrary to tradition by almost the entire Jewish community. The starting point of the argumentation is, in addition to general changes in American synagogues after World War II, the assumption that Los Angeles was the most suitable place for this foundation. Los Angeles has an impressive queer history and the Jewish community was more open, tolerant and innovative here than its counterpart on the East Coast. The Metropolitan Community Church was also founded in the city, and as the largest religious institution for homosexual Christians, it also served as the birthplace of queer synagogues.
Reform Judaism was chosen as the place of institutional integration of the community because a relative openness for such an endeavor was only seen here. Responsa written in response to a potential admission of Beth Chayim Chadashim can be used to understand the arguments and positions of rabbis and psychologists regarding homosexuality and communities for homosexual Jews in the early 1970s.
Ultimately, the commitment and dedication of the congregation and its heterosexual supporters convinced the decision-makers in Reform Judaism. The decisive impulse to question the situation of homosexual Jews in Judaism came from Los Angeles. With its analysis, the publication contributes to the understanding of Queer Jewish History in general and queer synagogues in particular.
This paper addresses issues of translating both words and rituals as Muslim cemetery keepers care for Jewish graves and recite traditional prayers for the dead in Morocco. Several issues of translation must be dealt with while considering these rare and disappearing practices. The first issue to be discussed is the translation of Hebrew inscriptions into French by cemetery keepers. One cemetery keeper in Meknes has tried to compile an exhaustive index of the names and dates represented on the gravestones under her care. The Muslim guard of the Jewish cemetery in Sefrou, on the other hand, has somewhat famously told visitors differing stories about his ability and willingness to pray the Kaddish over the graves of emigrated relatives who cannot return to mark an anniversary death. These practices provide the context for considering how the act of Muslims caring for Jewish graves creates linguistic and ritual translations of traditional Jewish ancestor care.
Rabbi Jacob ben Isaac of Yanova (d. 1623) is best known as the author of the Ze’enah U-Re’enah; the Melits Yosher (“Intercessor before God”) is one of his lesser known works. It was first published in Lublin in 1622 and reprinted once in Amsterdam in 1688. Like the Ze’enah U-Re’enah, it was a Torah commentary, but composed for men who had some yeshivah education, but who could not continue their studies. The commentary on the Song of Songs by Isaac Sulkes is another Yiddish work that addresses the same audience as the Melits Yosher. The purpose of this article is to bring to scholarly attention an audience that has not been noticed or studied in the previous scholarship on early modern Yiddish literature.