Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (79) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (79) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (79) (remove)
Keywords
- Festschrift (18)
- Informationsstruktur (18)
- Linguistik (18)
- Morphologie (18)
- Syntax (18)
- festschrift (18)
- information structure (18)
- linguistics (18)
- morphology (18)
- syntax (18)
Institute
- Department Linguistik (18)
- Institut für Romanistik (15)
- Institut für Slavistik (14)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (10)
- Verband für Patholinguistik e. V. (vpl) (7)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (6)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (6)
- Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (6)
- Zentrum für Qualitätsentwicklung in Lehre und Studium (ZfQ) (6)
- Klassische Philologie (2)
Gesundheitsbildung
(2019)
Tewje in Deutschland
(2019)
Drawing on the example of Sholem Aleichem’s Tevye the Dairyman, this article covers the history of Yiddish translation and publication in Germany in the 20th century.Following the paradigm of translation as a cultural practice, I demonstrate how the translation reflects aspects of Jewish-German cultural history, focussing on a mainly inner-Jewish identity discourse before the Shoah and a remembrance context after it. Whereas decisive differences and changes characterize 20th-century history in diachronic as well as synchronic respect, the article reflects also on continuities and parallels.
The Ram Bible (Tanakh Ram) is a recently-published Bible edition printed in two columns: the right-hand column features the original biblical Hebrew text and the lefthand column features the translation of the Bible into a high-register literary Israeli (Reclaimed Hebrew). The Ram Bible edition has gained impressive academic and popular attention. This paper looks at differences between academics, teachers, students, media personalities and senior officials in the education system, regarding their attitude to the Ram Bible. Our study reveals that Bible teachers and students who make frequent use of this edition understand its contribution to comprehending the biblical language, stories, and ideas. Opponents of Ram Bible are typically administrators and theoretician scholars who advocate the importance of teaching the Bible but do not actually teach it themselves. We argue that the fundamental difference between biblical Hebrew and Israeli makes the Hebrew Bible incomprehensible to native Israeli speakers. We explain the advantages of employing tools such as the Ram Bible.
Scholars of modern Jewish thought explore the hermeneutics of “translation” to describe the transference of concepts between discourses. I suggest a more radical approach – translation as transvaluation – is required. Eschewing modern tests of truth such as “the author would have accepted it” and “the author should have accepted it,” this radical form of translation is intentionally unfaithful to original meanings. However, it is not a reductionist reading or a liberating text. Instead, it is a persistent squabble depending on both source and translation for sustenance. Exploring this paradigm entails a review of three expositions of the Korah biblical narrative; three readings dedicated to keeping an eye on current events: (1) Tsene-rene (Prague, 1622), biblical prose; (2) Yaldei Yisrael Kodesh, (Tel Aviv, 1973), a secular Zionist reworking of Tsene-rene; and (3) The Jews are Coming (Israel, 2014–2017) a satirical television show.
Tewje in Deutschland
(2019)
Drawing on the example of Sholem Aleichem’s Tevye the Dairyman, this article covers the history of Yiddish translation and publication in Germany in the 20th century.Following the paradigm of translation as a cultural practice, I demonstrate how the translation reflects aspects of Jewish-German cultural history, focussing on a mainly inner-Jewish identity discourse before the Shoah and a remembrance context after it. Whereas decisive differences and changes characterize 20th-century history in diachronic as well as synchronic respect, the article reflects also on continuities and parallels.
This article explores an instructive case of translation critique against the background of the rise of Zionism in Europe at the turn of the previous century. It seeks to answer the question: Why did David Frishman, one of the most prolific Hebrew writers and translators of the late 1890s and early 1900s, criticize Vladimir Jabotinsky’s Russian translation of Hayim Nahman Bialik’s Hebrew poems? Both Bialik and Jabotinsky were major figures in the field of Hebrew culture and Zionist politics in the early 1900s, while Frishman generally shunned partisan activism and consistently presented himself as devoted solely to literature. Frishman perceived literature, nevertheless, as a political arena, viewing translation, in particular, as a locus of ideological debate. Writing from the viewpoint of a political minority at a time in which the Hebrew translation industry in Europe gained momentum, Frishman deemed translation a tool for cementing cultural hierarchies. He anticipated later analyses of the act and products of translation as reflective of intercultural tensions. The article suggests, more specifically, that it was Frishman’s view of the Hebrew Bible that informed his “avant-garde” stance on translation.
In a previously published article in HIN under the title of “Eduard Dorsch and his unpublished poem on the occasion of Humboldt’s 100th birthday,” I elaborated on Dorsch’s poem that was read in Detroit in front of a German-American audience on Sept. 14, 1869, a day widely celebrated in the US in honor of Humboldt. Although it was not surprising that Dorsch wrote the occasional poem in the first place given his affinities with Humboldt’s world of thought, a discovery of a second occasional poem upon further research in Dorsch’s voluminous papers was indeed unexpected, in this case read on the same date in Monroe, Michigan. Although there are a number of similarities between the Detroit and Monroe versions, there are enough differences that warrant this addendum to my original article.
Alexander von Humboldts und Aimé Bonplands Pflanzen im Herbarium der Universität Halle-Wittenberg
(2019)
Die Pflanzensammlung (Herbarium) der Universität Halle-Wittenberg enthält eine beträchtliche Anzahl von Pflanzenexemplaren, die von Alexander von Humboldt und Aimé Bonpland während ihrer amerikanischen Reise (1799–1804) gesammelt wurden. Wir erläutern die wissenschaftliche Bedeutung der Herbarbelege und wie sie ihren Weg nach Halle fanden.
Der erste Band von Humboldts Kosmos regte den preußischen Offizier und Dichter Bernhard von Lepel zu der Ode An Humboldt (1847) an. Der Dichter sandte Humboldt eine handschriftliche Kopie seines Werkes zu dessen 78. Geburtstag. Humboldt reagierte auf dieses Geschenk mit einer Einladung Lepels, den das persönliche Treffen mit dem berühmten Gelehrten ehrte aber auch enttäuschte, denn Humboldt ging nur oberflächlich auf die Ode ein, stattdessen las er seinem Gast aus dem zweiten Band des Kosmos vor. Allerdings erhielt Lepel Empfehlungsbriefe für Ludwig Tieck. Die Begegnung des Dichters mit Humboldt hat ihren Niederschlag vor allem in der Korrespondenz zwischen Bernhard von Lepel und seinem engen Freund Theodor Fontane gefunden.
Los estudios del viaje se centran en las experiencias, publicaciones y aportes científicos de Humboldt. El artículo estudia la situación política española en 1799, la posición y el influjo del poderoso ministro Urquijo, cuya caída y sus eventuales consecuencias en territorios americanos, son mencionados en forma pasajera y preocupada por Humboldt. Se transcribe el inusual registro de Humboldt como pasajero de la corbeta Castor, con detalles, algunos tergiversados, sobre el influjo de Georg Forster en su formación, su continuado empleo prusiano, su avance hacia territorio portugués y las dudas por la velocidad del viaje. Estos datos, junto con algunas críticas en Quito, contemporáneas y posteriores, así como problemas de al menos dos de sus interlocutores con la Inquisición limeña, ofrecen una “mirada americana”, ciertamente parcial, a Humboldt y explican, posiblemente, los pocos datos y la percepción negativa de su estadía en Lima.
In der kubanischen Hauptstadt Havanna eröffnet am 19. Dezember 2019 eine Dauerausstellung zu Alexander von Humboldt. Die Casa Museo Humboldt an einem historischen Ort der Altstadt wird damit zum weltweit ersten Alexander von Humboldt-Museum. In kubanischer-deutscher Kooperation erarbeitet, zeigt die Ausstellung Humboldt auf zwei Ebenen: im Kontext seiner Naturerforschung und dem seiner Begegnungen auf der fünfjährigen Amerikareise. Die Ausstellung richtet sich an kubanische wie internationale Besucher. Sie wirft einen hintergründigen und aktuellen Blick auf Humboldt in Amerika und versteht sich als Partner und Forum für Wissenschaft, Bildung und Kultur in Kuba.
Stimmstörungen bei Kindern
(2019)
Stimmstörungen
(2019)