Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (225) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (225) (remove)
Keywords
- Adverbs (1)
- Córdoba (1)
- Geschichte (1)
- Grammatik; Syntax; Gebrauch; Universalität; einzelsprachliche Besonderheiten (1)
- Hispanistik (1)
- Ideologues (1)
- Kongress (1)
- Linguistik (1)
- Orden de las palabras (1)
- Word order (1)
Institute
- Institut für Romanistik (225) (remove)
Laudation zur Verleihung des Doktogrades ehrenhalber an Herrn Prof. em. Dr. phil. Helmut Lüdke
(2008)
En 1797 se publicó en París una obra poco extensa en dos volúmenes bajo el título de Pasigraphie en las versiones francesa y alemana. Se dice que el término pasigrafía fue creado por el autor Joseph de Maimieux (1753-1820). Con la invención de la pasigrafía, Maimieux tuvo como objetivo crear una escritura conceptual que pudiera aplicarse a todos los idiomas. De esta manera, un texto escrito en esta escritura podría ser leído en todos los idiomas. El sistema pasigráfico se basa en un sistema de clasificación conceptual a priori al que se le asignan caracteres escritos. Se trata, pues, inicialmente de una lengua exclusivamente escrita sobre la que Maimieux dos años más tarde construyó también una lengua hablada o Pasilalía. Ya desde el círculo de los ideólogos se presentaron argumentos serios contra el intento de la Pasigrafía que fue afirmado particularmente por Johann Severin Vater. La diferencia decisiva entre Maimieux y sus críticos radica en la determinación de la función de los signos en la formación de conceptos. Mientras que para Maimieux los signos solo nombran los conceptos preestablecidos, para sus críticos los signos tienen una función en la constitución de los conceptos. Por lo tanto, un lenguaje universal no es posible en última instancia, ya que no hay conceptos universales y los lenguajes individuales conducen a estructuras conceptuales diferentes.
Prólogo
(2008)
Neuere Diskussionen um ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip : Innovation und Retrospektionshorizont
(2003)
Aménagement linguistique et normalisation de la langue portugaise : l'Antidoto da Lingua Portugueza
(2003)
Sprache und Evidenz
(2003)
The idea of a linguistic worldview was clearly expressed in German national romantic thought of the early 19th century, where language was seen as the expression of the spirit of a nation. Wilhelm von Humboldt argued that every language shaped the world-view of its speakers, but he also saw a possibility to improve human knowledge in the co-action of languages.
The idea of linguistic relativity can be found in John Locke’s statement that words interpose themselves between our understandings and the truth which it would contemplate and apprehend. In the 18th century, we can find formulations that our language accustoms us to arrange our ideas in a specific way, that some languages are more suitable for certain kinds of thought, or that metaphors have significant influence on peoples’ thought. In the 20thcentury the Neo-Humboldtian school revitalised the idea of an influence of language on thought in a reductionist way. At the end of the 20th century, some authors, for example John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, tried to rethink linguistic relativity and to prove it by empirical results.
The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (idéologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac’s (1714–1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740–1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.
Meaning and Function
(2022)
The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu‘s view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu‘s difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.
Semiotique et révolution : critique dune explication sémiotique de la continuité des Lumières
(2008)
Die Markierung der Herkunft des Sprecherwissens : ein grammatisches und pragmatisches Problem
(1998)
The term "analysis" came into use in Spanish school grammars during the first half of the nineteenth century. Following a process of simplification still evident today, the teaching of this concept in Spain distinguished between logical analysis and grammatical analysis, i.e. the separation or the division of sentences into clauses and of clauses into their immediate constituents and, on the other hand, the study of the parts of speech. A close perusal of various grammars, however, reveals that analysis is a concept used with different meanings, which minimises the distinction between logic and grammar. The term "analysis" includes elements of scholastic grammar and also aspects of the general grammar of the Port Royal School, which was introduced in Spain rather late, as well as ideological features associated with the impact of French ideas in Spain in the early nineteenth century. This paper shall explore the different concepts of "analysis" in Elementos de gramática c astellana by Juan Manuel Calleja, Análisis lógica y gramatical de la lengua espanola by Juan Calderón and Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos by Andrés Bello.
In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality.
It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe & Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale & Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.