Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (6) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2018 (6) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (6) (remove)
Keywords
- Affective Computing (1)
- Hilbig Männlichkeit Sexualität Parentifizierung (1)
- Verstheorie (1)
- affect (1)
- disposition (1)
- emotions (1)
- event (1)
- eventology (1)
- genealogy (1)
- psychopower (1)
- syllabotonischer Vers (1)
- theory (1)
- tschechische Lyrik 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (1)
- časomíra (1)
Institute
- Philosophische Fakultät (6) (remove)
Literaturen der Welt
(2018)
Wovon sprechen wir, wenn wir von Weltliteratur sprechen? Seit seiner goetheschen Prägung hat der Begriff der ‚Weltliteratur‘ immer wieder und auch in jüngerer Zeit eine breite Debatte innerhalb der philologischen Disziplinen erfahren. Dabei ist es spätestens seit Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts nicht mehr ausreichend, einen politischen Schlüsselbegriff in einen „vereinheitlichenden Singular“ zu verpacken: Die Heterogenität eines weltweit sich erstreckenden literarischen Feldes sowie historisch involvierter Mechanismen zumeist europäischer Zentralisierung bleiben nach wie vor unbeachtet. Eine verfestigte Literaturpolitik des Kanonischen suggeriert hier allein schon begrifflich einen exklusiven Deutungsanspruch des Weltliterarischen.
Daher bedarf es einer kritischen Fundierung zugunsten einer pluralisierenden Öffnung der Literaturwissenschaften auf die „Literaturen der Welt“. Der vorliegende Band verhandelt Ansätze, Analysen und Kritikpunkte der Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaft, Geschichte, Übersetzungswissenschaft, Soziologie und Genderforschung, die ein solches Unterfangen begleiten und vertiefen.
Der Band untersucht aus historisch-epistemologischer und metaphorologischer Perspektive die Maschine des Lebens und das Leben der Maschine in Literatur, Philosophie und Wissenschaft. Er spannt einen Bogen von der Mechanik der frühen Neuzeit über die Thermodynamik bis hin zur Kybernetik und ihren den Dualismus scheinbar nivellierenden Anspruch. Unkonventionelle Aktoren in der Nanotechnologie und Maschinen als tragische Helden im Gegenwartstheater bilden den Kulminationspunkt, der zugleich einen Versuch darstellt, die Theoriebildung der Actor-Network-Theory weiter zu entwickeln.
Affect Disposition(ing)
(2018)
The “affective turn” has been primarily concerned not with what affect is, but what it does. This article focuses on yet another shift towards how affect gets organized, i.e., how it is produced, classified, and controlled. It proposes a genealogical as well as a critical approach to the organization of affect and distinguishes between several “affect disposition(ing) regimes”—meaning paradigms of how to interpret and manage affects, for e.g., encoding them as byproducts of demonic possession, judging them in reference to a moralistic framework, or subsuming them under an industrial regime. Bernard Stiegler’s concept of psychopower will be engaged at one point and expanded to include social media and affective technologies, especially Affective Computing. Finally, the industrialization and cybernetization of affect will be contrasted with poststructuralist interpretations of affects as events.
The grammatization of European vernacular languages began in the Late Middle Ages and Renaissance and continued up until the end of the 18th century. Through this process, grammars were written for the vernaculars and, as a result, the vernaculars were able to establish themselves in important areas of communication. Vernacular grammars largely followed the example of those written for Latin, using Latin descriptive categories without fully adapting them to the vernaculars. In accord with the Greco-Latin tradition, the grammars typically contain sections on orthography, prosody, morphology, and syntax, with the most space devoted to the treatment of word classes in the section on “etymology.” The earliest grammars of vernaculars had two main goals: on the one hand, making the languages described accessible to non-native speakers, and on the other, supporting the learning of Latin grammar by teaching the grammar of speakers’ native languages. Initially, it was considered unnecessary to engage with the grammar of native languages for their own sake, since they were thought to be acquired spontaneously. Only gradually did a need for normative grammars develop which sought to codify languages. This development relied on an awareness of the value of vernaculars that attributed a certain degree of perfection to them. Grammars of indigenous languages in colonized areas were based on those of European languages and today offer information about the early state of those languages, and are indeed sometimes the only sources for now extinct languages. Grammars of vernaculars came into being in the contrasting contexts of general grammar and the grammars of individual languages, between grammar as science and as art and between description and standardization. In the standardization of languages, the guiding principle could either be that of anomaly, which took a particular variety of a language as the basis of the description, or that of analogy, which permitted interventions into a language aimed at making it more uniform.