Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2) (remove)
Language
- English (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Keywords
- social media (2) (remove)
Comment sections of online news platforms are an essential space to express opinions and discuss political topics. However, the misuse by spammers, haters, and trolls raises doubts about whether the benefits justify the costs of the time-consuming content moderation. As a consequence, many platforms limited or even shut down comment sections completely. In this thesis, we present deep learning approaches for comment classification, recommendation, and prediction to foster respectful and engaging online discussions. The main focus is on two kinds of comments: toxic comments, which make readers leave a discussion, and engaging comments, which make readers join a discussion. First, we discourage and remove toxic comments, e.g., insults or threats. To this end, we present a semi-automatic comment moderation process, which is based on fine-grained text classification models and supports moderators. Our experiments demonstrate that data augmentation, transfer learning, and ensemble learning allow training robust classifiers even on small datasets. To establish trust in the machine-learned models, we reveal which input features are decisive for their output with attribution-based explanation methods. Second, we encourage and highlight engaging comments, e.g., serious questions or factual statements. We automatically identify the most engaging comments, so that readers need not scroll through thousands of comments to find them. The model training process builds on upvotes and replies as a measure of reader engagement. We also identify comments that address the article authors or are otherwise relevant to them to support interactions between journalists and their readership. Taking into account the readers' interests, we further provide personalized recommendations of discussions that align with their favored topics or involve frequent co-commenters. Our models outperform multiple baselines and recent related work in experiments on comment datasets from different platforms.
Feminist Solidarities after Modulation produces an intersectional analysis of transnational feminist movements and their contemporary digital frameworks of identity and solidarity. Engaging media theory, critical race theory, and Black feminist theory, as well as contemporary feminist movements, this book argues that digital feminist interventions map themselves onto and make use of the multiplicity and ambiguity of digital spaces to question presentist and fixed notions of the internet as a white space and technologies in general as objective or universal. Understanding these frameworks as colonial constructions of the human, identity is traced to a socio-material condition that emerges with the modernity/colonialism binary. In the colonial moment, race and gender become the reasons for, as well as the effects of, technologies of identification, and thus need to be understood as and through technologies. What Deleuze has called modulation is not a present modality of control, but is placed into a longer genealogy of imperial division, which stands in opposition to feminist, queer, and anti-racist activism that insists on non-modular solidarities across seeming difference. At its heart, Feminist Solidarities after Modulation provides an analysis of contemporary digital feminist solidarities, which not only work at revealing the material histories and affective ""leakages"" of modular governance, but also challenges them to concentrate on forms of political togetherness that exceed a reductive or essentialist understanding of identity, solidarity, and difference.