Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (35) (entfernen)
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2016 (35) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Deutsch (18)
- Spanisch (7)
- Englisch (6)
- Französisch (2)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
- Portugiesisch (1)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (35) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Aesthetics (1)
- Antipoetry (1)
- Cognitive Construction Grammar (1)
- Funktionale Grammatik (1)
- Georg von der Gabelentz (1)
- Geschichte (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
- H. Steinthal (1)
- History of linguistics (1)
- Imaginäre Reise (1)
Institut
- Institut für Romanistik (35) (entfernen)
Los romanos llamaron Hispania a la Península Ibérica, nombre derivado del topónimo I-sepha-im con el que la identificaron los fenicios; los bizantinos usarán Spania para referirse a ella, y con el tiempo acabará originándose el término moderno España. Esta prolongación toponímica es un ejemplo sutil del profundo arraigo de los patrones de toda clase que los casi siete siglos de presencia romana en la Península proporcionaron. Aunando el análisis del procedimiento de conquista e incorporación de Hispania en el amplio marco político y territorial dominado por Roma con el diseño de la dinámica económica y social inherente a dicho proceso, Pedro Barceló y Juan José Ferrer Maestro ofrecen en esta “Historia de la Hispania romana” una obra regida por un enfoque tan riguroso como moderno que se ha convertido en referencia indispensable en la materia.
Gerda Haßler, María Luisa Calero Vaquera: Prefacio — Hacia un diálogo necesario
entre el pasado y el presente de la lingüística / Susana Azpiazu, Carmen Quijada:
El trabajo de Alarcos sobre los perfectos simple y compuesto en español como
hito gramaticográfico: antecedentes y proyección / Verónica Böhm, Anja Hennemann:
Algunas reflexiones historiográficas y recientes sobre el uso del subjuntivo
en español / Carmen Galán Rodríguez: Un outsider de la Lingüística — Alberto
Liptay y su proyecto Lengua Católica / Manuel Galeote: Los Discursos (1607) de
Echave Orio. La lengua vascongada y su antigüedad / José María García Martín: El
valor del Glosario de voces antiquadas y raras contenido en el Fulero Juzgo (1815).
El ejemplo del adverbio / Rolf Kemmler: Die Kurzgefaßte Spanische Grammatik
(1778) von Friedrich Gottlieb Barth (1738-1794) / Xavier Laborda Gil: Tiempo
personal e historia en 24 autobiografías de lingüistas españoles / María Dolores
Martínez Gavilán: Los inicios del racionalismo en la tradición gramatical española
(de 1614 a 1769) / Mario Pedrazuela Fuentes: Una visión de la filología europea de
entreguerras a través del archivo de José Fernández Montesinos / Barbara Schäfer-
Prieß: Universalistische Sprachtheorie in volkssprachlichen Grammatiken des 17.
Jahrhunderts. Amaro de Roboredos Método gramatical (1619) und Gonzalo Correas’
Arte grande (1625) / Isabel Zollna: Continuidad y (re-)comienzo en la lingüística de
la España decimonónica. Tradición y modernidad en la gramática general de García
Luna (1845)
Two Chilean poets with equal and yet different conceptions of poetry: While Nicanor Parra is considered one of the most important Latin American lyricists of the 20th century, the poetry of novelist Roberto Bolaño only finds little attention in comparison to his highly successful prose. Yet both authors give constructive answers to the possible functions of contemporary poetry under an epistemology based upon materialism that affects language as emancipatory capacity of each human individual. A comparative reading of two volumes of their poetry, Parra’s well known Poemas y antipoemas (1954) and Bolaño’s last ‘collection of poems’ Tres (2000), does not only demonstrate some structural links. The urgent question concerning the benefits of literature among globalized societies, involving highly complex cultural and linguistic identities, could benefit from a revived awareness towards poetry as historically relative formalization of language, but also as an efficient instrument to reflect the restrictions of language in times of its economic and cultural-industrial standardization.
The multifaceted concept of ‘form’ plays a central tole in the linguistic work of Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767–1835), where it is deeply entwined with aesthetic questions. H. Steinthal's (1823–1899) interpretation of linguistic form, however, made it the servant of psychology. The Formungstrieb (drive to formation) of Georg von der Gabelentz (1840–1893) challenged Steinthal's conception and placed a renewed emphasis on aesthetics. In this endeavour, Gabelentz drew on the work of such figures as August Friedrich Pott (1802–1887), Hans Conon von der Gabelentz (1807–1874) and William Dwight Whitney (1827–1894). In this paper, we examine Gabelentz' Formungstrieb and place it in its historical context.
Der "Totaleindruck einer Gegend" Alexander von Humboldts synoptische Visualisierunge des Klimas
(2016)
As the world cannot be adequately understood from the vantage point of a single language, the literatures of the world can no longer be trimmed to a single world literature in the Goethean sense. This recognition bodes well for the future of philology and of literary production. Through multiperspectival writing, knowledge of life may be attainable without being reduced to a single political, medial, cartographical, geocultural, or aesthetic logic. As a laboratory for polylogical thinking, literature does not represent reality, as Erich Auerbach put it. Rather, it represents multiple lived, experienced, or relivable realities. Whoever is open to a polylogical reception of the literatures of the world can perceive and experience how life knowledge transforms into lived knowledge and how knowledge for survival turns into knowledge for living together. However, literature can be more than it is only if it stays aware of the void, of lack, of privation, of the interminable: aware of the end that never is an end. Such a planetary concept of the literatures of the world offers valuable opportunities to all those who do not fall into the trap of contenting themselves with a supposed abundance of text.
Garcilaso de la Vega el Inca, for several centuries doubtlessly the most discussed and most eminent writer of Andean America in the 16th and 17th centuries, throughout his life set the utmost value on the fact that he descended matrilineally from Atahualpa Yupanqui and from the last Inca emperor, Huayna Cápac. Thus, both in his person and in his creative work he combined different cultural worlds in a polylogical way.1 Two painters boasted that very same Inca descent – they were the last two great masters of the Cuzco school of painting, which over several generations of artists had been an institution of excellent renown and prestige, and whose economic downfall and artistic marginalization was vividly described by the French traveller Paul Mancoy in 1837.2 While, during the 18th century, Cuzco school paintings were still much cherished and sought after, by the beginning of the following century the elite of Lima regarded them as behind the times and provincial, committed to an ‘indigenous’ painting style. The artists from up-country – such was the reproach – could not keep up with the modern forms of seeing and creating, as exemplified by European paragons. Yet, just how ‘provincial’, truly, was this art?