Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (196)
Year of publication
- 2020 (196) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (196) (remove)
Keywords
- Sprachgeschichte (3)
- American Jewish History (1)
- Anthropogenic impacts (1)
- Antike (1)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Archive (1)
- Ausländerbehörde (1)
- Changing nature of armed conflict (1)
- Chatbot (1)
- Climate change (1)
Institute
- Bürgerliches Recht (79)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (16)
- Historisches Institut (15)
- Strafrecht (13)
- Öffentliches Recht (12)
- Institut für Germanistik (10)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (9)
- Institut für Jüdische Theologie (8)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (7)
- Sozialwissenschaften (5)
Arbeitskampf 4.0
(2020)
Time to change
(2020)
Industry 4.0 leads to a radical change that is progressing incrementally. The new information and communication technologies provide many conceivable opportunities for their application in the context of sustainable corporate management. The combination of new digital technologies with the ecological and social goals of companies offers a multitude of unimagined potentials and challenges. Although companies already see the need for action, there was in the past and currently still is a lack of concrete measures that lever the potential of Industry 4.0 for sustainability management. During the course of this position paper we develop six theses (two from each sustainability perspective) against the background of the current situation in research and practice, and policy.
Artikel 69 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 67 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 60 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 66 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 68 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 74 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 70 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 72 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 75 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 57 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 76 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 64 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 71 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 77 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 73 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 59 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 58 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 56 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 65 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 63 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 61 EuInsVO
(2020)
Artikel 62 EuInsVO
(2020)
To ensure political survival, autocrats must prevent popular rebellion, and political repression is a means to that end. However, autocrats face threats from both the inside and the outside of the center of power. They must avoid popular rebellion and at the same time share power with strategic actors who enjoy incentive to challenge established power-sharing arrangements whenever repression is ordered. Can autocrats turn repression in a way that allows trading one threat off against the other? This chapter first argues that prior research offers scant insight on that question because it relies on umbrella concepts and questionable measurements of repression. Next, the chapter disaggregates repression into restrictions and violence and reflects on their drawbacks. Citizens adapt to the restriction of political civil liberties, and violence backfires against its originators. Hence, restrictions require enforcement, and violence requires moderation. When interpreted as complements, it becomes clear that restrictions and violence have the potential to compensate for their respective weaknesses. The complementarity between violence and restrictions turns political repression into a valuable addition to the authoritarian toolkit. The chapter concludes with an application of these ideas to the twin problems of authoritarian control and power-sharing.
Conclusion
(2020)
Does political repression work for authoritarian rule? On the one hand, repression is a hallmark of authoritarian governance. It denotes any action governments take to increase the costs of collective action. Autocrats consciously apply repression to curb popular opposition within their territorial jurisdiction. They repress in order to protect their policies, personnel, or other interests against challenges from below. Repression is, thus, a means to the end of political survival in non-democratic contexts. A useful means lives up to its promises. Does repression do that? This project started on the suspicion that we do not yet know the answer. This concluding chapter recalls the key theoretical ideas developed along the way, highlights the main findings of the book, and concludes with opportunities for future research.
Vorwort
(2020)
§ 651j BGB Verjährung
(2020)
§ 651n BGB Schadensersatz
(2020)
§ 651k BGB Abhilfe
(2020)
§ 651l BGB Kündigung
(2020)
§ 651m BGB Minderung
(2020)
§ 651s BGB Insolvenzsicherung der im Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum niedergelassenen Reiseveranstalter
(2020)
§ 651v BGB Reisevermittlung
(2020)
§ 651t BGB Vorauszahlungen
(2020)