Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (2)
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2) (remove)
Keywords
- HSFA2 (2) (remove)
In nature, plants are constantly exposed to many transient, but recurring, stresses. Thus, to complete their life cycles, plants require a dynamic balance between capacities to recover following cessation of stress and maintenance of stress memory. Recently, we uncovered a new functional role for macroautophagy/autophagy in regulating recovery from heat stress (HS) and resetting cellular memory of HS inArabidopsis thaliana. Here, we demonstrated that NBR1 (next to BRCA1 gene 1) plays a crucial role as a receptor for selective autophagy during recovery from HS. Immunoblot analysis and confocal microscopy revealed that levels of the NBR1 protein, NBR1-labeled puncta, and NBR1 activity are all higher during the HS recovery phase than before. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of proteins interacting with NBR1 and comparative proteomic analysis of annbr1-null mutant and wild-type plants identified 58 proteins as potential novel targets of NBR1. Cellular, biochemical and functional genetic studies confirmed that NBR1 interacts with HSP90.1 (heat shock protein 90.1) and ROF1 (rotamase FKBP 1), a member of the FKBP family, and mediates their degradation by autophagy, which represses the response to HS by attenuating the expression ofHSPgenes regulated by the HSFA2 transcription factor. Accordingly, loss-of-function mutation ofNBR1resulted in a stronger HS memory phenotype. Together, our results provide new insights into the mechanistic principles by which autophagy regulates plant response to recurrent HS.
Heat stress (HS) is one of the most common abiotic stresses, frequently affecting plant growth and crop production. With its fluctuating nature, HS episodes are frequently interspersed by stress-free intervals. Plants can be primed by HS, allowing them to survive better a recurrent stress episode. A memory of this priming can be maintained during stress-free intervals and this memory is closely correlated with transcriptional memory at several HS-inducible loci. This transcriptional memory is evident from hyper-induction of a locus upon a recurrent HS. ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE 2 (APX2) shows such hyper-induction upon recurring HS, however, the molecular basis of this transcriptional memory is not understood. Previous research showed that the HSinduced transcriptional memory at APX2 can last for up to seven days, and that it is controlled by cis-regulatory elements within the APX2 promoter.
To identify regulators involved in HS transcriptional memory, an unbiased forward genetic screening using EMS mutated seeds of pAPX2::LUC was performed from this screen. Two EMS mutants with affected transcriptional memory of LUC were identified. I confirmed that both two EMS mutants resulted from the gene mutations of HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE 1 (HAC1). Besides pAPX2::LUC, the HS-induced transcription of other HS memory genes were also affected in hac1 mutants. Moreover, HAC1 may promote HS transcriptional memory by acetylating promoters of HS memory genes.
On the other hand, to identify cis-regulatory elements that are required for transcriptional memory of APX2, I performed promoter analysis of the four conserved HSEs identified within a functional APX2 promoter. I found out that one of the HSEs (HSE1) is necessary for both HS-induced APX2 transcription and transcriptional memory, while another one of HSEs (HSE2) is important for HS-induced APX2 transcriptional memory. I also found out that the HSE1 itself (with 10 bp of flanking sequence) is sufficient to confer HS-induced APX2 transcriptional memory, and HSE1 is also necessary for HSFA2 to bind on APX2 promoter and activate APX2 transcription. The findings will provide important clues for the molecular mechanism of transcriptional memory and will enable engineering of enhanced stress tolerance in crops.