Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (302) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (224)
- Part of a Book (37)
- Review (27)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (10)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (302) (remove)
Keywords
- Geschichte (3)
- Kongress (2)
- Linguistik (2)
- evidentiality (2)
- Adverbs (1)
- Córdoba (1)
- Diskontinuität (1)
- Funktionale Grammatik (1)
- Grammatik; Syntax; Gebrauch; Universalität; einzelsprachliche Besonderheiten (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
Institute
- Institut für Romanistik (302) (remove)
La conciencia lingüística y la realidad de la lengua española en el cambio del siglo XVIII al XIX
(2022)
Meaning and Function
(2022)
The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu‘s view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu‘s difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.
The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (idéologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac’s (1714–1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740–1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.
The idea of a linguistic worldview was clearly expressed in German national romantic thought of the early 19th century, where language was seen as the expression of the spirit of a nation. Wilhelm von Humboldt argued that every language shaped the world-view of its speakers, but he also saw a possibility to improve human knowledge in the co-action of languages.
The idea of linguistic relativity can be found in John Locke’s statement that words interpose themselves between our understandings and the truth which it would contemplate and apprehend. In the 18th century, we can find formulations that our language accustoms us to arrange our ideas in a specific way, that some languages are more suitable for certain kinds of thought, or that metaphors have significant influence on peoples’ thought. In the 20thcentury the Neo-Humboldtian school revitalised the idea of an influence of language on thought in a reductionist way. At the end of the 20th century, some authors, for example John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, tried to rethink linguistic relativity and to prove it by empirical results.
Aus Freude an der Sprache
(2020)
Présentation
(2020)
En 1797 se publicó en París una obra poco extensa en dos volúmenes bajo el título de Pasigraphie en las versiones francesa y alemana. Se dice que el término pasigrafía fue creado por el autor Joseph de Maimieux (1753-1820). Con la invención de la pasigrafía, Maimieux tuvo como objetivo crear una escritura conceptual que pudiera aplicarse a todos los idiomas. De esta manera, un texto escrito en esta escritura podría ser leído en todos los idiomas. El sistema pasigráfico se basa en un sistema de clasificación conceptual a priori al que se le asignan caracteres escritos. Se trata, pues, inicialmente de una lengua exclusivamente escrita sobre la que Maimieux dos años más tarde construyó también una lengua hablada o Pasilalía. Ya desde el círculo de los ideólogos se presentaron argumentos serios contra el intento de la Pasigrafía que fue afirmado particularmente por Johann Severin Vater. La diferencia decisiva entre Maimieux y sus críticos radica en la determinación de la función de los signos en la formación de conceptos. Mientras que para Maimieux los signos solo nombran los conceptos preestablecidos, para sus críticos los signos tienen una función en la constitución de los conceptos. Por lo tanto, un lenguaje universal no es posible en última instancia, ya que no hay conceptos universales y los lenguajes individuales conducen a estructuras conceptuales diferentes.
Modalité et polyphonie
(2019)
Dans cette étude du grec ancien, nous souhaitons souligner deux particularités peu remarquées de l’adjectif verbal en –τέος, toutes deux liées à la modalité déontique. L’une concerne la possibilité rare de trouver l’adjectif verbal d’obligation avec la négation non assertive μή, alors que la très grande majorité des occurrences négatives comporte la négation assertive οὐ. L’autre est liée à l’emploi au potentiel de cet adjectif verbal d’obligation : dans ces énoncés, se pose la question de la combinaison entre la modalité du potentiel et la modalité déontique de l’adjectif verbal. Il nous semble que ces deux particularités peu fréquentes sont révélatrices du fonctionnement de la modalité déontique dans l’adjectif verbal d’obligation à l’époque classique (Xénophon et Platon en font ainsi un usage abondant).
La integración de la aspectualidad como categoría semántico-funcional en la lingüística española
(2019)
The notion of ‘epiphenomenon’ is usually used to exclude certain
aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of ‘epiphenomenon’, which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically. The best-known definition of languages as an epiphenomenon is that proposed by Chomsky, who declared that the specific realisations of language do not warrant scientific attention, but there were early relegations of properties of individual languages to the domain of an epiphenomenon of grammar, to the domain of an art and not a science. These relegations from a certain point of abstraction did advance theories of language, even though they took a point of abstraction that did not correspond to the complexity of language.
Le centenaire de la publication du Cours de linguistique générale (1916) de Ferdinand de Saussure nous a invité à reconsidérer l’importance de cet ouvrage et le rôle de son auteur pour la fondation d’une linguistique intégrée dans une sémiologie. Il n’y a aucun doute que cet auteur fut extrêmement important pour le développement de la linguistique structurale en Europe et qu’avec son concept du signe linguistique il a fait œuvre de pionnier pour le tournant sémiologique. Mais l’accueil favorable d’une théorie dans le milieu scientifique ne s’explique pas seulement par sa qualité intérieure, mais par plusieurs conditions extérieures. Ces conditions seront analysées sur trois plans: (1) l’arrivée de la méthode des néogrammairiens à ses limites qui incitait alors à l’étude de l’unité du signifiant et du signifié; (2) la simplification et l’outrance de la pensée structurale dans le Cours, publié en 1916 par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye et (3) la préparation de la réception de la pensée sémiologique par plusieurs travaux parallèles.
El orden de las palabras era un tema muy discutido en los siglos XVII y XVIII en toda Europa. En el siglo XVIII se multiplicaron las objeciones contra la teoría del orden natural, aducidas por gramáticos, filósofos y literatos, y apoyadas por deliberaciones sobre la interdependencia entre el lenguaje y el pensamiento y reflexiones estéticas.
En esta contribución se describirán las tendencias generales de la discusión europea antes de pasar a su recepción y su desarrollo en España. En esta versión abreviada nos limitaremos al ejemplo de un manuscrito de Luis Marcelino Pereira (1754-1811) para exponer su argumentación sobre el orden de las palabras, pero en la versión
más desarrollada nos ocuparemos del tratamiento del orden de las palabras en varias gramáticas castellanas hasta Andrés Bello (1781-1865). Pereira indica en su manuscrito [1798-1799] que el orden fijo del inglés y del francés dependería del uso obligatorio del pronombre sujeto en estas lenguas. En español se puede omitir este pronombre, es posible invertir el orden de las palabras, teniendo en cuenta la intencionalidad del hablante. Tales ideas se destacan desde la perspectiva actual, pero hay que contextualizarlas y explicar su aparición en su tiempo.
The assumption of linguistics relativity and the definition of languages as epiphenomena are certainly known as two contradictory positions from the last century. But I will start my discussion of them in the period of their appearance and then use this as a basis to evaluate the heuristic value of these positions in present day linguistics. I will start with the definition of language as an epiphenomenon and then I will go on with the linguistic relativity.
The notion of ʽepiphenomenon’ is usually used to exclude certain aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of ʽepiphenomenonʼ, which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically.
Definit oder indefinit?
(2018)
In 1916, three years after the death of Ferdinand de Saussure, the Cours de linguistique générale (CLG) was published in Geneva. This foundational work marked the beginning of a discipline that has profoundly influenced the development of the humanities ever since.
What sources influenced the CLG? Do the main concepts of this seminal work have the same validity today as they did in 1916? How has the recent development of language sciences influenced its reception? How does this text account for meaning and communication within the context of speech (parole)?
In order to explore these questions, one hundred years after the publication of Ferdinand de Saussure's seminal work on General Linguistics, Polis--The Jerusalem Institute of Languages and Humanities held an interdisciplinary conference that gathered 14 international specialists from various disciplines: general linguistics, pragmatics, philology, dialectology, translation studies, terminology, and philosophy.
The first section of this work reassesses the sources and further influence of the CLG on modern linguistics. The book's second part discusses some of the main concepts and dichotomies of the CLG (constitution of the linguistic method, arbitrariness of sign, main dichotomies), under the light of both the original manuscripts and recent linguistic developments (influence of dialectology or translation studies). The third and last part handles the pragmatic and semantic dimensions of language, suggesting new avenues of reflection that could not yet have been fully taken into account within the CLG itself.
Uniting 14 scholarly articles, together with an introduction, an index locorum and a collective bibliography, this volume hopes to encourage readers with its reappraisal and reinterpretation of Saussure's ground-breaking work and thus contribute to the future development of linguistics and humanities.
Die Beiträge des vorliegenden Bandes tragen der Multidimensionalität und Multifunktionalität parenthetischer Einschübe Rechnung, die die internationale linguistische Forschung in den letzten Jahrzenten herausgearbeitet hat. In mehrheitlich korpusgestützten Untersuchungen wird gesprochenes und geschriebenes Deutsch sowie Deutsch kontrastiv zu romanischen Sprachen analysiert.
Was ist unbestimmt am indefinido? Antworten aus der Geschichte der spanischen Grammatikographie
(2017)
Philologie und Grammatik bei der Analyse von metasprachlichen Manuskripten des 18. Jahrhunderts
(2017)
El traductor de textos no literarios en los siglos XVIII y XIX: enciclopedista, innovador y mediador
(2017)
Las traducciones de textos científicos jugaban un papel importante
en el desarrollo de las ciencias en España en la segunda mitad del siglo xviii y en la primera del siglo xix. Nos concentraremos en los traductores que contribuyeron a la difusión del saber científico como la publicación de la traducción de la Enciclopedia Metódica a partir de 1788,cuyo objetivo fue promover el desarrollo de España, especialmente en el aspecto económico. Los textos franceses sobre química eran otro objeto muy frecuente de traducción, por
ejemplo, la Memoria sobre la necesidad de perfeccionar y reformar la nomenclatura de la química (1787) de Lavoisier. Los traductores buscaban soluciones traductológicas que se adaptasen mejor al genio de la lengua española y se entendían como enciclopedistas, innovadores y mediadores.
Uno sguardo che renda omogenee le teorie della lingua relative al XVII e al XVIII secolo non può cogliere che a grandi linee la realtà delle concezioni della lingua abbracciate in questo periodo. Il riconoscimento di una teoria cartesiana della lingua come la spiegazione indifferenziata degli sviluppi conseguenti il passaggio da visioni razionalistiche a concezioni orientate ai sensi sono risultato di tale omogeneizzazione, un processo che contempla la realtà solo in parte.
Il pensiero linguistico era contrassegnato da un misto di forme di riflessione di carattere narrativo e di tipo concettuale-razionale che si completavano in modo reciproco. Se l’approccio concettuale tentava di rilevare le proprietà fondamentali della lingua e ordinarle razionalmente, le forme narrative della riflessione linguistica non si rivolgevano alla lingua in quanto oggetto concettuale. Piuttosto la rappresentavano come oggetto da comprendere. Gli approcci narrativi e concettuali alla lingua prevedono differenze discorsive nelle impostazioni teorico-linguistiche. Anche lo stampo del pensiero teoretico-linguistico contribuisce, attraverso tradizioni differenti, alla molteplicità delle vedute teoretico-linguistiche. Per tradizioni intendiamo posizioni dominanti nella riflessione metalinguistica, presenti in contesti regionali, che possono differenziarsi da altre tradizioni. Ad ogni modo, anche il ritardato sviluppo o la ricezione di teorie linguistiche può condurre a differenze caratteristiche. Le teorie linguistiche dell´Illuminismo furono per esempio recepite in Spagna più tardi che in altri Paesi europei. Ciò condusse all’accettazione sincronica di elementi teorici relativi a teorie diverse e consecutive. Se si concentra l’attenzione al di fuori dell’Europa si verrà attratti dallo sviluppo degli approcci analoghi alla riflessione linguistica che trovarono sviluppo in Cina all’inizio del XX secolo.
Unità e diversità sono tuttavia rintracciabili non solo sul piano della conoscenza metalinguistica ma anche sul piano dell’oggetto. Una sfida per la descrizione della lingua orientata alla tradizione greco-latina era rappresentata dalle lingue indigene con le quali si stava iniziando ad entrare in contatto attraverso i viaggi di scoperta e in seguito all’inizio del colonialismo. Da affiancare alla comunicazione esogena della trasmissione metalinguistica dei rapporti nell’ambito delle lingue europee sono presenti anche approcci per una percezione della specificità categoriale delle lingue americane. Sebbene in alcuni casi non verranno riconosciute le giuste categorizzazioni per le lingue descritte, per lo meno verrà assodato che le categorie rese note dalla grammatica latina non sussistono.
Nella ricerca degli ultimi decenni, la rappresentazione di un paradigma della filosofia della lingua del XVII e del XVIII secolo che postordini e subordini universalmente la molteplicità delle lingue a strutture valide di pensiero e che prescriva per la riflessione linguistica categorie fisse di una grammatica generale strettamente orientata alla logica razionalistica è stata più volte relativizzata. In quanto connessa con la fondatezza dell’unità e con l’inalterabilità del genere umano a seconda di spazio e tempo, la tesi che le lingue nella loro natura molteplice possano esistere solo alle dipendenze di una struttura universale del pensiero si lasciava catalogare tra quelle posizioni paradigmatiche sussistenti nell’ambito della filosofia della lingua di allora. Attraverso la conoscenza dell’origine storica dell’evoluzione dell’uomo, di tutti i suoi stili di vita e forme di comunicazione, assume rilievo un’altra posizione paradigmatica che attribuisce alla lingua un influsso formativo sul pensiero.
Attraverso la differenziazione ideologico-filosofica e la specificità nazionale delle sue tesi relative alla lingua in generale e alle lingue storiche in particolare la visione secolarizzata dell’uomo e della società elaborata all’apice dell’Illuminismo si associava allo sviluppo corrispettivo e al cambiamento delle posizioni teorico-linguistiche. Con la proclamazione della lingua e del pensiero come risultati di un lungo sviluppo corrispettivo nella storia dell’umanità viene assegnato nuovo valore alle prese di posizione sulla natura e sull’origine della lingua.