Refine
Year of publication
- 2003 (48) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (39)
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (4)
Keywords
- Estnisch (1)
- Estonian (1)
- Experimentelle Linguisitk (1)
- Korpuslinguistik (1)
- Phonologie (1)
- Psycholinguistik (1)
- Spracherwerb (1)
- Sprachverarbeitung (1)
- Syntax (1)
- Verbmorphologie (1)
Institute
- Department Linguistik (48) (remove)
Verbales Arbeitgedächtnis und die Verarbeitung lexikalisch ambiger Wörter in Wort- und Satzkontexten
(2003)
Counting Markedness
(2003)
This paper reports the results of a corpus investigation on case conflicts in German argument free relative constructions. We investigate how corpus frequencies reflect the relative markedness of free relative and correlative constructions, the relative markedness of different case conflict configurations, and the relative markedness of different conflict resolution strategies. Section 1 introduces the conception of markedness as used in Optimality Theory. Section 2 introduces the facts about German free relative clauses, and section 3 presents the results of the corpus study. By and large, markedness and frequency go hand in hand. However, configurations at the highest end of the markedness scale rarely show up in corpus data, and for the configuration at the lowest end we found an unexpected outcome: the more marked structure is preferred.
Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Lesefehler eines 10jährigen Jungen (OL) mit Entwicklungsdyslexie, der bei seinen Leseversuchen ausschließlich eine buchstabierende Lesestrategie anwendete. OL zeigte eine starke Beeinträchtigung in der Entwicklung sowohl der lexikalischen und als auch der nichtlexikalischen Leseroute. Im Rahmen einer detaillierten Fehlerklassifikation wurden die Fehler beim nichtlexikalischen Lesen auf einzelne Subkomponenten der nichtlexikalischen Leseroute, des Parsers, Translators und Blenders (Temple, 1985) übertragen. Die Mehrheit der Lesefehler von OL tauchte auf der Ebene des Blenders auf. Auslassungen vorher bereits benannter Grapheme stellten den häufigsten Fehlertyp dar. Die Beeinträchtigung in der Entwicklung der Blendingfähigkeiten wird daher als hauptsächliche Ursache für OLs Unfähigkeit, eine nichtlexikalische Verarbeitungsstrategie aufzubauen, angesehen.
In der neurolinguistischen Forschung gewinnt das Erwerbsalter als einflußnehmende Variable auf die lexikalische Verarbeitung zunehmend an Bedeutung. Ein normiertes Datenkorpus liegt für das Deutsche jedoch noch nicht vor. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht drei unterschiedliche Formen des Erwerbsalters für konkrete Nomina des Deutschen: produktives Erwerbsalter, Benennalter und geschätztes Erwerbsalter. Das geschätzte Erwerbsalter wurde für ein Korpus von 255 Objektbezeichnungen (Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980), erhoben. Geschätztes Erwerbsalter, Benennalter und produktives Erwerbsalter wurden für ein Subset von 33 Stimuli miteinander verglichen. Es zeigten sich hochsignifikante Korrelationen zwischen allen drei Formen des Erwerbsalters. Allerdings erwies sich das produktive Erwerbsalter als signifikant niedriger als das geschätzte Erwerbsalter und das Benennalter, während sich letztere Messungen nicht voneinander unterscheiden. Das geschätzte Erwerbsalter scheint daher am ehesten dem Benennalter zu entsprechen. Die Ergebnisse weisen darauf hin, daß das Benennalter eine geeignete Messung zur Validierung von geschätzten Erwerbsdaten darstellt.
The present paper addresses a current view in the psycholinguistic literature that case exhibits processing properties distinct from those of other morphological features such as number (cf. Fodor & Inoue, 2000; Meng & Bader, 2000a/b). In a speeded-acceptability judgement experiment, we show that the low performance previously found for case in contrast to number violations is limited to nominative case, whereas violations involving accusative and dative are judged more accurately. The data thus do not support the proposal that case per se is associated with special properties (in contrast to other features such as number) in reanalysis processes. Rather, there are significant judgement differences between the object cases accusative and dative on the one hand and the subject nominative case on the other. This may be explained by the fact that nominative has a specific status in German (and many other languages) as a default case.
In the recent literature there is a hypothesis that the human parser uses number and case information in different ways to resolve an initially incorrect case assignment. This paper investigates what role morphological case information plays during the parser’s detection of an ungrammaticality or its recognition that a reanalysis is necessary. First, we compare double nominative with double accusative ungrammaticalities in a word by word, speeded grammaticality task and in this way show that only double nominatives lead to a so-called ”illusion of grammaticality” (a low rate of ungrammaticality detection). This illusion was found to disappear when the second argument was realized by a pronoun rather than by a full definite determiner phrase, i.e. when the saliency of the second argument was increased. Thus, the accuracy in recognizing an ungrammaticality induced by the case feature of the second argument is dependent on the type of this argument. Furthermore, we found that the accuracy in detecting such case ungrammaticalities is distance sensitive insofar as a shorter distance leads to a higher accuracy. The results are taken as support for an ”expectationdriven” parse strategy in which the way the parser uses the information of a current input item depends on the expectation resulting from the parse carried out so far. By contrast, ”input-driven” parse strategies, such as the diagnosis model (Fodor & Inoue, 1999) are unable to explain the data presented here.
Do we know the answer?
(2003)
Die Studie untersucht den Erwerb der frühen Verbmorphologie im Estnischen. Als Datengrundlage der Arbeit dienen Spontansprachaufnahmen von 10 estnischsprachigen Kindern im Alter zwischen 10 und 32 Monaten. Die Studie versucht eine detaillierte Analyse des Erwerbs des estnischsprachigen Verbmorphologie vorzunehmen. Dabei werden die aufeinander folgenden Entwicklungsstadien, ihre ungefähren Altersgrenzen, sowie Erwerbsreihenfolge dargestellt und mit typologisch unterschiedlichen Sprachen verglichen.
German-learning infants' ability to detect unstressed closed-class elements in continuous speech
(2003)
Fisch oder Karpfen ? : lexikale Aktivierung von Benennungsalternativen bei der Objektbenennung
(2003)
The quality of vowels in French depends to a large extent on the kind of syllables they are in. Tense vowels are often in open syllables and lax vowels in closed ones. This generalization, which has been called loi de position in the literature, is often overridden by special vowel-consonant coocurrence restrictions obscuring the generalization. The paper shows first that the admission of semi-syllables in the phonology of French explains a large number of counterexamples. Many final closing consonants on the phonetic representation can be understood as onsets of following rhymeless syllables, opening in this way the last full syllable. Arguments coming from phonotactic regularities support this analysis. The second insight of the paper is that the Optimality Theory is a good framework to account for the intricate data bearing on the relationship between vowels and syllable structure. The loi de position is an effect dubbed Emergence of the Unmarked, instantiated only in case no higher-ranking constraint renders it inactive.
The present paper addresses a current view in the psycholinguistic literature that case exhibits processing properties distinct from those of other morphological features such as number (cf. Fodor & Inoue, 2000; Meng & Bader, 2000a/b). In a speeded-acceptability judgement experiment, we show that the low performance previously found for case in contrast to number violations is limited to nominative case, whereas violations involving accusative and dative are judged more accurately. The data thus do not support the proposal that case per se is associated with special properties (in contrast to other features such as number) in reanalysis processes. Rather, there are significant judgement differences between the object cases accusative and dative on the one hand and the subject nominative case on the other. This may be explained by the fact that nominative has a specific status in German (and many other languages) as a default case.
It has been claimed that the functional architecture of German clauses involves heads such as [Topic] that are defined by their information structure value, and that movement to the specifier position of such heads is (partially) responsible for free word order in German. This paper argues that this view is misguided. (i) There is no evidence for a syntactically defined topic position in the middle field of German clauses. (ii) The distinction between marked and unmarked serialization must also be made for structures that do not involve movement. (iii) Movement in the interest of information structure is often altruistic
Filling first positions
(2003)
Europäische Slavistische Linguistik : Beiträge der Europäischen Slavistischen Linguistik (Polyslav)
(2003)
This is the first issue of a series in which affiliates of the Institute of Linguistics report the results of their experimental work. Generative linguistics usually rely on the method of native speaker judgements in order to test their hypotheses. If a hypothesis rules out a set of sentences, linguistics can ask native speakers whether they feel these sentences are indeed ungrammatical in their language. There are, however, circumstances where this method is unreliable. In such cases a more elaborate method to test a hypothesis is called. All papes in this series, and hence, all papers in this volume deal with issues that cannot be reliably tested with native speaker judgements. This volume contains 7 papers, all using different methods and finding answers to very different questions. This heterogenity, by the way, reflects the various interests and research programs of the institute. The paper, by Trutkowski, Zugck, Blaszczak, Fanselow, Fischer and Vogel deals with superiority in 10 Indo-European languages. The paper by Schlesewsky, Fanselow and Frisch and by Schlesewsky and Frisch, deal with the role of case in processing German sentences. The paper by Vogel and Frisch deals with resolving case conflicts, as does the paper by Vogel and Zugck. The nature of partitive case is the topic of the paper by Fischer. The paper by K?gler deals with the realization of question intonation in two German dialects. We hope that you enjoy reading the papers!