Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (5)
Year of publication
- 2020 (5) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (5) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5)
Keywords
Institute
- Institut für Romanistik (5) (remove)
The notion of ‘epiphenomenon’ is usually used to exclude certain
aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of ‘epiphenomenon’, which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically. The best-known definition of languages as an epiphenomenon is that proposed by Chomsky, who declared that the specific realisations of language do not warrant scientific attention, but there were early relegations of properties of individual languages to the domain of an epiphenomenon of grammar, to the domain of an art and not a science. These relegations from a certain point of abstraction did advance theories of language, even though they took a point of abstraction that did not correspond to the complexity of language.
En 1797 se publicó en París una obra poco extensa en dos volúmenes bajo el título de Pasigraphie en las versiones francesa y alemana. Se dice que el término pasigrafía fue creado por el autor Joseph de Maimieux (1753-1820). Con la invención de la pasigrafía, Maimieux tuvo como objetivo crear una escritura conceptual que pudiera aplicarse a todos los idiomas. De esta manera, un texto escrito en esta escritura podría ser leído en todos los idiomas. El sistema pasigráfico se basa en un sistema de clasificación conceptual a priori al que se le asignan caracteres escritos. Se trata, pues, inicialmente de una lengua exclusivamente escrita sobre la que Maimieux dos años más tarde construyó también una lengua hablada o Pasilalía. Ya desde el círculo de los ideólogos se presentaron argumentos serios contra el intento de la Pasigrafía que fue afirmado particularmente por Johann Severin Vater. La diferencia decisiva entre Maimieux y sus críticos radica en la determinación de la función de los signos en la formación de conceptos. Mientras que para Maimieux los signos solo nombran los conceptos preestablecidos, para sus críticos los signos tienen una función en la constitución de los conceptos. Por lo tanto, un lenguaje universal no es posible en última instancia, ya que no hay conceptos universales y los lenguajes individuales conducen a estructuras conceptuales diferentes.
The idea of a linguistic worldview was clearly expressed in German national romantic thought of the early 19th century, where language was seen as the expression of the spirit of a nation. Wilhelm von Humboldt argued that every language shaped the world-view of its speakers, but he also saw a possibility to improve human knowledge in the co-action of languages.
The idea of linguistic relativity can be found in John Locke’s statement that words interpose themselves between our understandings and the truth which it would contemplate and apprehend. In the 18th century, we can find formulations that our language accustoms us to arrange our ideas in a specific way, that some languages are more suitable for certain kinds of thought, or that metaphors have significant influence on peoples’ thought. In the 20thcentury the Neo-Humboldtian school revitalised the idea of an influence of language on thought in a reductionist way. At the end of the 20th century, some authors, for example John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, tried to rethink linguistic relativity and to prove it by empirical results.