Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (32)
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (17)
- Deutsch (14)
- Französisch (1)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (32)
Schlagworte
- Reading comprehension (2)
- Reading strategies (2)
- Self-regulated learning (2)
- Co-regulation (1)
- Feedback (1)
- Reading fluency (1)
- Reciprocal teaching (1)
Institut
Implizites versus explizites Leistungsstreben : Befunde zur Unabhängigkeit zweier Motivationssysteme
(2002)
Motivation und Persönlichkeit : von der Analyse von Teilsystemen zur Analyse ihrer Interaktionen
(1999)
Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the Implicit Association Test
(2004)
The authors examined the validity of an Implicit Association Test (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) for assessing individual differences in achievement tendencies. Eighty-eight students completed an IAT and explicit self- ratings of achievement orientation, and were then administered a mental concentration test that they performed either in the presence or in the absence of achievement-related feedback. Implicit and explicit measures of achievement orientation were uncorrelated. Under feedback, the IAT uniquely predicted students' test performance but failed to predict their self-reported task enjoyment. Conversely, explicit self-ratings were unrelated to test performance but uniquely related to subjective accounts of task enjoyment. Without feedback, individual differences in both performance and enjoyment were independent of differences in either of the two achievement orientation measures. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
Selbstgesteuertes Lernen
(2001)
Motivation
(1997)
Implicit power motivation predicts testosterone changes after winning or losing a domiance contest
(2001)
In this classroom intervention study, reciprocal teaching (RI) of reading strategies was combined with explicit instruction in self-regulated learning (SRL) to promote the reading comprehension of fifth-grade students (N = 306). Twelve intact classes were randomly assigned either to an RT + SRL condition or to an RI condition without explicit instruction in self-regulation. Three additional classes served as a no-treatment comparison group. Strategies instruction was delivered by trained assistants in conventional German language lessons. Students practiced the application of these strategies in small groups. Both at posttest and at maintenance (8 weeks after the intervention), students in the two intervention conditions (RT and RI + SRL) outperformed comparison students in measures of reading comprehension, strategy-related task performance, and self-efficacy for reading. Relative to RI students, students in the RI + SRL condition were better able to maintain training-induced performance gains over the follow-up interval. A moderated mediation analysis revealed that this difference in the sustainability of the two treatments was (a) mediated by the successful mastery of the learned strategies and (b) most evident among students with poor reading fluency skills.