Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Keywords
- insects (2) (remove)
Institute
Das Ziel des hier beschriebenen Masterprojekts war es, eine Methode zu etablieren, mit der Insekten in Gießharz eingeschlossen werden können, damit sie dauerhaft konserviert für mikroskopische Untersuchungen im Biologieunterricht zur Verfügung stehen. Die Masterarbeit enthält eine ausführliche Anleitung zur Herstellung von Gießharzpräparaten mit darin eingebetteten Insekten. Sie soll als Handreichung vor allem für Biologie-Lehrkräfte dienen, um selbstständig hochwertige Lehrpräparate für ihren Unterricht herstellen zu können. Aufgrund der Komplexität des Themas werden Naturschutzbestimmungen und die Beschaffung der Insekten genauso beleuchtet wie deren anschließende Präparation, die Konstruktion einer eigenen Gießform, die Einbettung der Insekten in Gießharz und die Nachbehandlung des Gießlings. Wichtige Einflussfaktoren, die die Qualität der Präparate entscheidend beeinflussen und mögliche Fehlerquellen, werden ausführlich erläutert. Mittels dieser detaillierten Eingießanleitung können mit relativ einfachen und kostengünstigen Mitteln faszinierende Studienobjekte für einen anschaulichen Biologieunterricht entstehen.
Biodiversity and abundance of wildlife has dramatically declined in agricultural landscapes. Sown, short-lived wildflower (WF) strips along the margins of crop fields are a widespread and often subsidised in agri-environmental schemes, intended to enhance biodiversity, provide refuges for wild plant and arthropod populations and to provide ecosystem services to crops. Meanwhile, WF elements are also criticised, since their functionality decreases with plant succession, the removal of aged WF strip poses an ecological trap for the attracted arthropod populations and only common and mobile species benefit. Further, insects in WF strips are impacted by pesticides from agricultural fields due to shared boundaries with crop fields and by edge effects. The performance of the measure could be improved by combining several WF strips of different successional stages, each harbouring a unique community of plants and arthropods, into persistent, composite WF block, where successional stages exist in parallel. Monitoring data on many taxa in the literature shows, that a third of species are temporarily present in an ageing WF stip, thus offering composite WF blocks should increase cumulative species richness by 28%-39% compared to annual richness in WF strips. Persistence of composite WF blocks would offer reliable refuge for animal and plant populations, also supporting their predators and herbivores. Further, WF blocks have less boundaries to crops compared to WF strips of the same area, and are less impacted by edge effects and pesticides. Policy implications. Here I suggest a change of conservation practice changing from successional WF strips to composite WF blocks. By regular removal and replacement of aged WF strips either within the block (rotational) or at its margins (rolling), the habitat heterogeneity in composite WF block could be perpetuated. Rolling composite WF blocks change locations over years, and the original location can be reconverted to arable land while a nearby WF block is still available to wildlife. A change in agricultural schemes would be necessary, since in some European countries clustered WF strips are explicitly not subsidised.