Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Coherence relation (1)
- Connective (1)
- Illocutionary force (1)
- Speech act (1)
- Textstruktur (1)
- Zeitungskommentare (1)
- annotation (1)
- argument mining (1)
- argumentation (1)
- argumentation mining (1)
Institute
- Department Linguistik (3) (remove)
The aim of this thesis is to develop approaches to automatically recognise the structure of argumentation in short monological texts. This amounts to identifying the central claim of the text, supporting premises, possible objections, and counter-objections to these objections, and connecting them correspondingly to a structure that adequately describes the argumentation presented in the text.
The first step towards such an automatic analysis of the structure of argumentation is to know how to represent it. We systematically review the literature on theories of discourse, as well as on theories of the structure of argumentation against a set of requirements and desiderata, and identify the theory of J. B. Freeman (1991, 2011) as a suitable candidate to represent argumentation structure. Based on this, a scheme is derived that is able to represent complex argumentative structures and can cope with various segmentation issues typically occurring in authentic text.
In order to empirically test our scheme for reliability of annotation, we conduct several annotation experiments, the most important of which assesses the agreement in reconstructing argumentation structure. The results show that expert annotators produce very reliable annotations, while the results of non-expert annotators highly depend on their training in and commitment to the task.
We then introduce the 'microtext' corpus, a collection of short argumentative texts. We report on the creation, translation, and annotation of it and provide a variety of statistics. It is the first parallel corpus (with a German and English version) annotated with argumentation structure, and -- thanks to the work of our colleagues -- also the first annotated according to multiple theories of (global) discourse structure.
The corpus is then used to develop and evaluate approaches to automatically predict argumentation structures in a series of six studies: The first two of them focus on learning local models for different aspects of argumentation structure. In the third study, we develop the main approach proposed in this thesis for predicting globally optimal argumentation structures: the 'evidence graph' model. This model is then systematically compared to other approaches in the fourth study, and achieves state-of-the-art results on the microtext corpus. The remaining two studies aim to demonstrate the versatility and elegance of the proposed approach by predicting argumentation structures of different granularity from text, and finally by using it to translate rhetorical structure representations into argumentation structures.
Handbuch Textannotation
(2015)
Das Potsdamer Kommentarkorpus ist eine Sammlung von Zeitungstexten, die dem Genre ‘Kommentar' zuzuordnen sind. Der öffentlich verfügbare Teil besteht aus 175 Texten aus der Märkischen Allgemeinen Zeitung, die hinsichtlich Syntax, Koreferenz, Konnektoren und Rhetorische Struktur manuell annotiert wurden. Weitere Ebenen werden bei zukünftigen Korpusversionen hinzukommen. Dieses Buch enthält die Annotationsrichtlinien, die der Bearbeitung des öffentlichen Teils des Korpus zugrunde lagen, sowie auch anderer Teile, bei denen mit weiteren Annotationsebenen experimentiert wurde. Die meisten der Richtlinien werden auch für ähnliche Text-Genres und für andere Sprachen verwendbar sein.
The meaning of linguistic connectives has often been characterized in terms of their position in a bipartite (semantic, pragmatic) or a tripartite (content, epistemic, speech act) structure of domains, depending on what kinds of entities are being connected (largely: propositions or speech acts). This paper argues that a more fine-grained analysis can be achieved by directing some more attention to the characterization of the entities being related. We propose an inventory of categories of illocutionary status for labelling the spans that are being connected. On this basis, the distinction between the content and the epistemic domain, in particular, can be made more explicit. Focusing on the group of causal connectives in German, we conducted a corpus annotation study from which we derived distinct pragmatic 'usage profiles' of the most frequent causal connectives. Finally, we offer some suggestions on the role of illocutions in relation-based accounts of discourse structure.