Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (21253) (remove)
Language
- English (21253) (remove)
Keywords
- climate change (95)
- Germany (71)
- stars: massive (57)
- diffusion (47)
- morphology (47)
- stars: early-type (47)
- gamma rays: general (46)
- German (45)
- stars: winds, outflows (45)
- Climate change (43)
Institute
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (4063)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (3383)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (2601)
- Institut für Chemie (2231)
- Department Psychologie (1126)
- Institut für Mathematik (957)
- Department Linguistik (762)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (726)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (572)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (571)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (498)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (442)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (292)
- Sozialwissenschaften (274)
- Extern (235)
- Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften (212)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (188)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering gGmbH (187)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (171)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (166)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (151)
- Institut für Romanistik (141)
- Historisches Institut (136)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (105)
- Institut für Germanistik (103)
- Fachgruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre (97)
- Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (95)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (69)
- Philosophische Fakultät (65)
- Öffentliches Recht (60)
- Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften (55)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (54)
- Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät (46)
- Department für Inklusionspädagogik (43)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Dynamik komplexer Systeme (43)
- Institut für Slavistik (41)
- Institut für Künste und Medien (38)
- Department Grundschulpädagogik (34)
- Strukturbereich Bildungswissenschaften (33)
- Bürgerliches Recht (32)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (30)
- Institut für Philosophie (28)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (28)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Dünne Organische und Biochemische Schichten (26)
- Institut für Jüdische Theologie (22)
- Zentrum für Gerechtigkeitsforschung (17)
- Department Musik und Kunst (16)
- Hochschulambulanz (12)
- Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM) (12)
- Klassische Philologie (11)
- Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) (11)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Biopolymere (10)
- Potsdam Transfer - Zentrum für Gründung, Innovation, Wissens- und Technologietransfer (10)
- Sonderforschungsbereich 632 - Informationsstruktur (10)
- Lehreinheit für Wirtschafts-Arbeit-Technik (8)
- Zentrum für Umweltwissenschaften (8)
- Strafrecht (6)
- Abraham Geiger Kolleg gGmbH (5)
- Zentrum für Lern- und Lehrforschung (5)
- Zentrum für Qualitätsentwicklung in Lehre und Studium (ZfQ) (5)
- Gesundheitsmanagement (4)
- Moses Mendelssohn Zentrum für europäisch-jüdische Studien e. V. (4)
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) e. V. (4)
- Juristische Fakultät (3)
- Multilingualism (3)
- Zentrum für Sprachen und Schlüsselkompetenzen (Zessko) (3)
- An-Institute (2)
- Botanischer Garten (2)
- DV und Statistik Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2)
- Forschungsbereich „Politik, Verwaltung und Management“ (2)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Kognitive Studien (2)
- Referat für Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (2)
- UP Transfer (2)
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (2)
- Akademie für Psychotherapie und Interventionsforschung GmbH (1)
- Arbeitskreis Militär und Gesellschaft in der Frühen Neuzeit e. V. (1)
- Digital Engineering Fakultät (1)
- Institut für Lebensgestaltung-Ethik-Religionskunde (1)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Massenspektronomie von Biopolymeren (1)
- Kommunalwissenschaftliches Institut (1)
- Organe und Gremien (1)
- Patholinguistics/Neurocognition of Language (1)
- Theodor-Fontane-Archiv (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek (1)
Article 33, para. 2
(2011)
Article 1 F
(2011)
State sucession in treaties
(2012)
Continuity of states
(2012)
In 2009, 'Palestine' lodged a declaration recognizing the jurisdiction of the ICC under Article 12(3). However, in April 2012, the OTP determined that this declaration had not brought about the result, of providing for the ICC's jurisdiction, pending clarification from the political organs of the UN concerning the legal status of Palestine within the organization. On 29 November 2012, the General Assembly granted Palestine the status of a non-member observer state within the UN framework, thereby fulfilling the condition mentioned by the OTP in April 2012. It is against this background that the article considers the current legal effects of the 2009 Palestinian declaration. In particular, it addresses the issue of whether the declaration, when read in conjunction with the 29 November 2012 decision, possesses retroactive effect, i.e. whether it provides, as claimed, for the Court's temporal jurisdiction from 1 July 2002 onwards or rather starting only from 29 November 2012.
... the current status granted to Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly is that of 'observer', not as a 'Non-member State'. ... [T]his... informs the current legal status of Palestine for the interpretation and application of article 12 [Rome Statute]. ... The Office could in the future consider allegations of crimes committed in Palestine, should competent organs of the United Nations... resolve the legal issue relevant to an assessment of article 12. ... International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, 'Situation in Palestine', 3 April 2012
Draft Article 15 of the International Law Commission’s project on crimes against humanity — dealing with the settlement of disputes arising from a proposed convention — attempts to strike a balance between state autonomy and robust judicial supervision. It largely follows Article 22 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which renders the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) conditional upon prior negotiations. Hence, the substance of the clause can be interpreted in light of the recent case law of the ICJ, especially in the case Georgia v. Russia. In addition, this contribution discusses several issues regarding the scope ratione temporis of the compromissory clause. It advances several proposals to improve the current draft, addressing its relationship with state responsibility — an explicit reference to which is currently missing — as well as the relationship between the ICJ and a possible treaty body. It also proposes to recalibrate the interplay of the requirement of prior negotiations with, respectively, the possibility of seizing a future treaty body and the indication of provisional measures by the ICJ.
Article 22
(2011)
Legal shades of grey?
(2021)
As part of the current process of de-formalization in international law, States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to such secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with, and interpretation in line with, other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.
As part of the current overall process of de-formalization in international law States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or ‘Memoranda of Understanding’ (‘MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with and interpretation in line with other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective ‘adoption’.