Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (82) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (64)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (7)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Other (1)
- Review (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (82)
Keywords
Institute
Einleitung
(2017)
Vorwort
(2017)
Global commons form a comparatively new part of international law, since the term appeared in international discussions and codifications only in the second half of the 20th century. The Common Heritage of Mankind is the corresponding legal principle that can establish an international regime to determine the legal status of non-sovereign territories and to allocate exploitation rights. Its main aim is to balance competing national claims by emphasising mankind’s common interest in the preservation and controlled exploitation of natural re-
sources. Against this background, the chapter sheds a critical light on attempts to transfer the institute of the Common Heritage of Mankind to the sphere of communication. Taking debates revolving around the New World Information and Communication Order in the framework of UNESCO since the late 1970s as a starting point, the author analyses the pitfalls and limits of attempts to establish governance structures for a global information order, including recent attempts to govern the internet.
The nineteenth century witnessed restoration and reformation, the heyday of the nation state in Europe and inter-state cooperation at the same time. Driven by technical progress, communication across borders became an everyday phenomenon demanding transnational cooperation and regulation. Whereas in the political field irregular conferences turned out to be an appropriate instrument for governing transnational cooperation, a more constant and institutionalised matter proved to be adequate for technical cooperation.
In 1865, the International Telegraph Convention set up a relevant administrative union which merged in 1932 with the International Radiotelegraph Union from 1906 to form the newly labelled International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The parties to the ITU met regularly in so-called plenipotentiary conferences every 3 years. Already in 1875 the International Telegraph Convention was completely redrafted and the organisation’s structure changed. The contracting parties created an instrument that paved the way for a modern form of international standard setting. The new, simplified convention contained only general provisions of a policy nature that would remain in effect for an “indeterminate length of time” (Art. 20), detailed rules of a transitory and specific nature that might be subject to frequent changes with the progress of technology were put into the “Regulations for international service” (also known as the Telegraph Regulations). The newly established “administrative conferences” attended by technical experts from the member states were responsible for revising the regulations when necessary.
This was an early example of the transferral of power from sovereign nation states to an international organisation in order to govern transnational communication effectively. The administrative unions, as the first examples in modern history, show the ability of self-interested rational agents to overcome collective action dilemmas, i.e. situations where cooperation avoids sub-optimal outcomes for cooperators. The newly created institutions shaped a spirit of cooperation and the practice of standard setting proved that cooperation is effective. Furthermore, they show the spill-over effects of cooperation: increased cooperation in one area leads to increased cooperation in other areas.
Der Rechtsstaat im Risiko
(2012)
Menschenrechtsverletzungen: Was kann ich dagegen tun? : Menschenrechtsverfahren in der Praxis
(2012)
Xenophobia
(2008)
Aliens, intregration
(2008)
Das globale Menschenrechtssystem : Entwicklungsstand und Voraussetzungen seiner Verwirklichung
(2009)
Der Beitrag zeichnet die völkerrechtlichen Normierungen des Verbotes der Todesstrafe nach und erläutert, welche Beschränkungen der staatlichen Souveränität im Bereich der Todesstrafe auferlegt sind. Als Ergebnis kann festgestellt werden, daß es kein generelles, jeden Staat bindendes Verbot der Todesstrafe gibt. Noch ist es so, daß ein Staat sich direkt und ausdrücklich zur Abschaffung der Todesstrafe bekennen muß solange er dies nicht tut, ist die Verhängung und Vollstreckung der Todesstrafe bei Beachtung bestimmter rechtsstaatlicher Kautelen völkerrechtlich gesehen zulässig.
Der Aufsatz behandelt die völkerrechtlichen Grundlagen des Folterverbotes sowohl auf internationaler als auch auf regionaler Ebene und erläutert die Möglichkeiten der völkerrechtlichen Überwachungen. Besonderes Gewicht liegt hierbei naturgemäß auf der Arbeit des Ausschusses gegen die Folter und andere grausame, unmenschliche oder erniedrigende Behandlung oder Strafe.